Re: Shouldn't the definition of maintainer-clean be changed?

2007-03-20 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hello Benoit, Please limit followups to this message to *ONE* group only, except as noted below, for simplicity let's say automake@gnu.org as this is where things started off. I've already thrown out a couple of lists. * Benoit Sigoure wrote on Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 10:42:09PM CET: Here is a

Re: Shouldn't the definition of maintainer-clean be changed?

2007-03-20 Thread Bruce Korb
Not knowing the guts of this, my only complaint has to do with the help text for ``--clean'' and the lack of consistency WRT ``-c'' being an acceptable alias for it. Benoit Sigoure wrote: Index: autoconf/bin/autoconf.as === RCS

Re: Shouldn't the definition of maintainer-clean be changed?

2007-03-20 Thread Benoit Sigoure
Quoting Bruce Korb [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Not knowing the guts of this, my only complaint has to do with the help text for ``--clean'' and the lack of consistency WRT ``-c'' being an acceptable alias for it. Yeah you're right, the message should be consistent in the different programs. What

Re: Shouldn't the definition of maintainer-clean be changed?

2007-03-19 Thread Benoit Sigoure
Quoting Ralf Wildenhues [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hello everyone, First, please be aware of another thread discussing a similar topic: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.gnulib.bugs/9692/focus=9695 * Benoit Sigoure wrote on Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 12:39:32PM CET: In a first time, I'm trying to