Den 2010-06-08 18:19 skrev Christopher Hulbert:
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 11:03 AM, Peter Rosinp...@lysator.liu.se wrote:
Den 2010-06-08 15:40 skrev Christopher Hulbert:
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 9:24 AM, Peter Rosinp...@lysator.liu.sewrote:
I've had enough frustration here, methinks.
[[Adding Libtool List]]
On 8 Jun 2010, at 08:42, Charles Wilson wrote:
Which is why I don't think even the Peter's long-ready MSVC patches, nor
my pile of pending patches, are candidates for this extremely shortened
release cycle.
Regarding these patches, I honestly have paid very little
On Tue, 8 Jun 2010, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
[[Adding Libtool List]]
On 8 Jun 2010, at 08:42, Charles Wilson wrote:
Which is why I don't think even the Peter's long-ready MSVC patches, nor
my pile of pending patches, are candidates for this extremely shortened
release cycle.
Regarding these
Hi Gary!
Den 2010-06-08 09:34 skrev Gary V. Vaughan:
[[Adding Libtool List]]
On 8 Jun 2010, at 08:42, Charles Wilson wrote:
Which is why I don't think even the Peter's long-ready MSVC patches, nor
my pile of pending patches, are candidates for this extremely shortened
release cycle.
Hi Vincent,
On 8 Jun 2010, at 15:17, Vincent Torri wrote:
On Tue, 8 Jun 2010, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
[[Adding Libtool List]]
On 8 Jun 2010, at 08:42, Charles Wilson wrote:
Which is why I don't think even the Peter's long-ready MSVC patches, nor
my pile of pending patches, are candidates
Den 2010-06-08 10:22 skrev Peter Rosin:
It seems odd both to (a) have entries from 2009 in the (future-to-be) 2010
ChangeLog and (b) to make changes to the 2009 ChangeLog at this point.
I see that for the first merge of master into the branch last year I
updated the dates in the ChangeLog so
On 06/08/2010 02:22 AM, Peter Rosin wrote:
There's already the pr-msvc-support branch, but when I tried to merge
master into it to make it easy to merge back later, the ChangeLog rotation
caused conflicts.
Do you have Bruno Haible's git-merge-changelog program installed on your
machine? For
Den 2010-06-08 11:50 skrev Eric Blake:
On 06/08/2010 02:22 AM, Peter Rosin wrote:
There's already the pr-msvc-support branch, but when I tried to merge
master into it to make it easy to merge back later, the ChangeLog rotation
caused conflicts.
Do you have Bruno Haible's git-merge-changelog
[adding Bruno, as author of git-merge-changelog]
On 06/08/2010 04:14 AM, Peter Rosin wrote:
I have git-merge-changelog. But my changes on the branch are in ChangeLog,
and the question was where they should be after the merge, in ChangeLog
or in ChangeLog.2009. I was not asking how the merge
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 4:22 AM, Peter Rosin p...@lysator.liu.se wrote:
Hi Gary!
Den 2010-06-08 09:34 skrev Gary V. Vaughan:
[[Adding Libtool List]]
On 8 Jun 2010, at 08:42, Charles Wilson wrote:
Which is why I don't think even the Peter's long-ready MSVC patches, nor
my pile of pending
On 8 June 2010 09:17, Vincent Torri vto...@univ-evry.fr wrote:
even if you install mingw cross toolchain on linux ? You can even test
Windows CE with cegcc on linux
FWIW, my experience is that the mingw cross toolchain on linux is not
a close enough approximation of the real thing on Windows;
On 8 Jun 2010, at 15:22, Peter Rosin wrote:
Hi Gary!
Hey Peter!
Den 2010-06-08 09:34 skrev Gary V. Vaughan:
[[Adding Libtool List]]
On 8 Jun 2010, at 08:42, Charles Wilson wrote:
Which is why I don't think even the Peter's long-ready MSVC patches, nor
my pile of pending patches, are
Hi Chris,
Forgive my jumping in again here...
On 8 Jun 2010, at 17:47, Christopher Hulbert wrote:
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 4:22 AM, Peter Rosin p...@lysator.liu.se wrote:
Den 2010-06-08 09:34 skrev Gary V. Vaughan:
On 8 Jun 2010, at 08:42, Charles Wilson wrote:
Which is why I don't think even
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 7:40 AM, Gary V. Vaughan g...@gnu.org wrote:
Hi Chris,
Forgive my jumping in again here...
No problem, at least the subject is being talked about.
On 8 Jun 2010, at 17:47, Christopher Hulbert wrote:
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 4:22 AM, Peter Rosin p...@lysator.liu.se
Hi Christopher!
Den 2010-06-08 15:06 skrev Christopher Hulbert:
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 7:40 AM, Gary V. Vaughang...@gnu.org wrote:
I think it important to merge pr-msvc-support into master one way or
another so that it doesn't get ignored for any longer than it has already.
I would like it
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 9:24 AM, Peter Rosin p...@lysator.liu.se wrote:
Hi Christopher!
Den 2010-06-08 15:06 skrev Christopher Hulbert:
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 7:40 AM, Gary V. Vaughang...@gnu.org wrote:
I think it important to merge pr-msvc-support into master one way or
another so that it
Hi Chris,
On 8 Jun 2010, at 20:06, Christopher Hulbert wrote:
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 7:40 AM, Gary V. Vaughan g...@gnu.org wrote:
I think it important to merge pr-msvc-support into master one way or
another so that it doesn't get ignored for any longer than it has already.
I would like it
Den 2010-06-08 15:40 skrev Christopher Hulbert:
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 9:24 AM, Peter Rosinp...@lysator.liu.se wrote:
I've had enough frustration here, methinks.
Sorry for my contribution to your frustration. I would just like to
see windows support in the mainstream to be done right, and
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 11:03 AM, Peter Rosin p...@lysator.liu.se wrote:
Den 2010-06-08 15:40 skrev Christopher Hulbert:
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 9:24 AM, Peter Rosinp...@lysator.liu.se wrote:
I've had enough frustration here, methinks.
Sorry for my contribution to your frustration. I would
On 6/8/2010 6:47 AM, Christopher Hulbert wrote:
Peter/Charles,
Do you have a summary of the capabilities added by your
patches/branch
I'll let Peter speak for himself, but these are the patches in the
cygwin and mingw distributions:
* Pass various runtime library flags to GCC.
20 matches
Mail list logo
