Hi Gary,
* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 06:03:19AM CEST:
I'm planning to make the belated 2.4 release in about 24 hours.
Great!
If there is any reason you'd like me to hold off for a bit longer,
please speak up now!
I don't know of any confirmed regression that we have
Hi Bruce,
* Bruce Korb wrote on Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 12:00:37AM CEST:
I seem to be missing something and can't quite figure it out.
I get these messages during autoreconf:
build_libposix autoreconf
configure.ac:29: required file `build-aux/ltmain.sh' not found
Use -i to have things
Hallo Ralf,
On 19 Sep 2010, at 14:40, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 06:03:19AM CEST:
I'm planning to make the belated 2.4 release in about 24 hours.
Great!
If there is any reason you'd like me to hold off for a bit longer,
please speak up now!
* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 06:03:19AM CEST:
I'm planning to make the belated 2.4 release in about 24 hours.
If there is any reason you'd like me to hold off for a bit longer,
please speak up now!
Rainer just confirmed a regression in this thread:
Hallo Ralf,
On 19 Sep 2010, at 18:14, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 06:03:19AM CEST:
I'm planning to make the belated 2.4 release in about 24 hours.
If there is any reason you'd like me to hold off for a bit longer,
please speak up now!
Rainer
On Sun, 19 Sep 2010, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
Hi Bob,
On 19 Sep 2010, at 21:41, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
On Sun, 19 Sep 2010, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
I'm planning to make the belated 2.4 release in about 24 hours.
Yesterday I ran the libtool test suite on various machines here. The test suite
On 9/19/2010 11:45 AM, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
Unfortunately, my MinGW testing is not so successful. The testing still
quits part-way through with some sort of make-related issue (as reported
in detail previously).
Odd. My last test on MinGW was very successful. This was version 1.3266
Den 2010-09-19 16:41 skrev Bob Friesenhahn:
On Sun, 19 Sep 2010, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
I'm planning to make the belated 2.4 release in about 24 hours.
Yesterday I ran the libtool test suite on various machines here. The
test suite performed quite well (better than a week or two ago) on
Hi Bob,
* Bob Friesenhahn wrote on Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 05:45:45PM CEST:
Unfortunately, my MinGW testing is not so successful. The testing
still quits part-way through with some sort of make-related issue
(as reported in detail previously).
I don't have that previous report on my radar. Can
On Sun, 19 Sep 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Bob Friesenhahn wrote on Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 05:45:45PM CEST:
Unfortunately, my MinGW testing is not so successful. The testing
still quits part-way through with some sort of make-related issue
(as reported in detail previously).
I don't have
* Bob Friesenhahn wrote on Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 08:45:08PM CEST:
On Sun, 19 Sep 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Bob Friesenhahn wrote on Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 05:45:45PM CEST:
Unfortunately, my MinGW testing is not so successful. The testing
still quits part-way through with some sort of
* Bob Friesenhahn wrote on Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 09:27:08PM CEST:
On Sun, 19 Sep 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
The above is produced today after re-installing MinGW/GCC using the
latest TDM GCC installer (with GCC 4.5.1). It is similar to what I
observed before. The test suite used to work so
On Sun, 19 Sep 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
The 'make' used is GNU make 3.79.1.
Yeah, that has the same bug.
There is a 'mingw32-make' which
is GNU make 3.82, but does not seem to work under MSYS.
That one's not for you, normally. IIUC it's for the development of, not
with, MSYS.
It is
On 9/19/2010 3:27 PM, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
The 'make' used is GNU make 3.79.1.
Yikes. Where did THAT come from? MSYS has provided at least make-3.81
for several years; the current msys make is 3.82.
There is a 'mingw32-make' which is
GNU make 3.82, but does not seem to work under MSYS.
* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 01:20:17PM CEST:
On 19 Sep 2010, at 18:14, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Rainer just confirmed a regression in this thread:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-libtool/2010-09/msg00032.html
(his latest message hasn't shown up in the archives yet).
On 9/19/2010 12:57 PM, Charles Wilson wrote:
On 9/19/2010 11:45 AM, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
Unfortunately, my MinGW testing is not so successful. The testing still
quits part-way through with some sort of make-related issue (as reported
in detail previously).
Odd. My last test on MinGW was
On Sep 20, 2010, at 3:18 AM, Ralf Wildenhues ralf.wildenh...@gmx.de wrote:
* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 01:20:17PM CEST:
On 19 Sep 2010, at 18:14, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Rainer just confirmed a regression in this thread:
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project GNU Libtool.
The branch, master has been updated
via f05840852938b904ac81502f7162e19525206f59 (commit)
from
Hi Gary,
* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 04:49:34AM CEST:
In due course, I'd rather try to encourage people to install
autobuild, and submit results there, than waste time maintaining a
parallel list in PLATFORMS manually. But I won't have time to get to
that for a while, nor
On 19 Sep 2010, at 14:34, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Hi Gary,
Hallo Ralf,
* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 04:49:34AM CEST:
In due course, I'd rather try to encourage people to install
autobuild, and submit results there, than waste time maintaining a
parallel list in PLATFORMS
Hi!
tests/lt_dlexit.at turned out to be trival to fix for MSVC.
Ok to push? No rush for the release though, it's only the
testsuite...
Cheers,
Peter
From f05840852938b904ac81502f7162e19525206f59 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Peter Rosin p...@lysator.liu.se
Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2010 14:14:21
Hi Peter,
* Peter Rosin wrote on Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 04:05:06PM CEST:
tests/lt_dlexit.at turned out to be trival to fix for MSVC.
Ok to push? No rush for the release though, it's only the
testsuite...
Okay if the test still passes with GCC on Cygwin and MinGW.
Thanks!
Ralf
Subject:
Hi Ralf,
Den 2010-09-19 16:16 skrev Ralf Wildenhues:
* Peter Rosin wrote on Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 04:05:06PM CEST:
tests/lt_dlexit.at turned out to be trival to fix for MSVC.
Ok to push? No rush for the release though, it's only the
testsuite...
Okay if the test still passes with GCC on
23 matches
Mail list logo
