Re: Fix ltdl files installation (was: branch 2.0, make install DESTDIR=)

2005-08-18 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Fri, Aug 05, 2005 at 03:09:23PM CEST: * Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 03:43:34PM CEST: Peter O'Gorman writes: Perhaps instead of going through hoops here we need to rethink the whole idea of using tar to keep the timestamps accurate. Maybe

Fix ltdl files installation (was: branch 2.0, make install DESTDIR=)

2005-08-05 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
[ This should fix once and for all the issues that have come up with the changes put in so far for Jeff Squyres' bug report: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/libtool/2005-02/msg00115.html and have caused numerous problems in the meantime:

Re: Fix ltdl files installation (was: branch 2.0, make install DESTDIR=)

2005-08-05 Thread Bob Friesenhahn
On Fri, 5 Aug 2005, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: OK. Let's just install them in the correct order. libtoolize can still use the `tar' pipe to keep the time stamps on the way from the installatinon dir to the user package source tree. Proposed patch OK for branch-1-5? Unfortunately, the forward

Re: Fix ltdl files installation (was: branch 2.0, make install DESTDIR=)

2005-08-05 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Bob Friesenhahn wrote on Fri, Aug 05, 2005 at 05:19:47PM CEST: On Fri, 5 Aug 2005, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: OK. Let's just install them in the correct order. libtoolize can still use the `tar' pipe to keep the time stamps on the way from the installatinon dir to the user package source

Re: Fix ltdl files installation (was: branch 2.0, make install DESTDIR=)

2005-08-05 Thread Bob Friesenhahn
On Fri, 5 Aug 2005, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: Thanks, also to Peter. I was unsure whether libtoolize should be changed to copy in order as well (and _not_ preserve time stamps). A `libtoolize --copy --force' would then assure that copied files are newer than any other files in the existing

Re: branch 2.0, make install DESTDIR=

2005-08-01 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hi Peter, Sorry for the late response. Peter O'Gorman writes: Ralf Wildenhues wrote: | | OK. Does `id -u' tell you whether you are SYSTEM (id 0?) or not? | What would be an appropriate solution for cygwin? Perhaps instead of going through hoops here we need to rethink the whole idea of

Re: branch 2.0, make install DESTDIR=

2005-07-12 Thread Peter O'Gorman
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ralf Wildenhues wrote: | | OK. Does `id -u' tell you whether you are SYSTEM (id 0?) or not? | What would be an appropriate solution for cygwin? Perhaps instead of going through hoops here we need to rethink the whole idea of using tar to keep the

Re: branch 2.0, make install DESTDIR=

2005-07-11 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hi Charles, * Charles Wilson wrote on Sun, Jul 10, 2005 at 08:46:26PM CEST: is broken -- at least on cygwin, but probably everywhere. *snip* tar: configure: Cannot stat: No such file or directory tar: Error exit delayed from previous errors tar: configure: Cannot stat: No such file or

Re: branch 2.0, make install DESTDIR=

2005-07-11 Thread Charles Wilson
Ralf Wildenhues wrote: (B) cygwin-specific: There is no root user. There might be a SYSTEM user which is somewhat similar, and Administrator which is somewhat similar in other ways -- but regardless there is no facility to do CHOWN unless you're building as Administrator (not SYSTEM).

branch 2.0, make install DESTDIR=

2005-07-10 Thread Charles Wilson
is broken -- at least on cygwin, but probably everywhere. ( cd ../libltdl /bin/sh /usr/src/libtool/devel/CVS/libtool-b2.0/config/missing --run tar chf - COPYING.LIB README Makefile.am Makefile.in argz_.h argz.c configure.ac configure libltdl/lt__alloc.h libltdl/lt__dirent.h