On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 06:20:32PM +0100, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Hello, and sorry for the looong delay,
* Toshio Kuratomi wrote on Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 08:18:58PM CEST:
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 2:17 PM, Toshio Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 10:25:06PM +0200,
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 2:17 PM, Toshio Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 10:25:06PM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Toshio Kuratomi wrote on Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 10:20:09PM CEST:
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 04:04:04PM -0400, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
Greetings. I package
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 04:04:04PM -0400, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
Greetings. I package software for Fedora and frequently get hit with
/usr/lib64 being added as an rpath in builds. I found what I think is the
last thread on this subject here:
* Toshio Kuratomi wrote on Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 10:20:09PM CEST:
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 04:04:04PM -0400, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
Greetings. I package software for Fedora and frequently get hit with
/usr/lib64 being added as an rpath in builds. I found what I think is the
last thread on
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 10:25:06PM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Toshio Kuratomi wrote on Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 10:20:09PM CEST:
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 04:04:04PM -0400, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
Greetings. I package software for Fedora and frequently get hit with
/usr/lib64 being added
Greetings. I package software for Fedora and frequently get hit with
/usr/lib64 being added as an rpath in builds. I found what I think is the
last thread on this subject here:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/libtool-patches/2010-06/msg00141.html
In the second message, Olly Betts links to a