* Charles Wilson wrote on Wed, Jul 01, 2009 at 06:48:52AM CEST:
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Yes but can you please check that you don't need to add another 3
patches for F77, FC, GCJ?
Well, the whole tag-based mechanism in libtool makes my teeth ache,
I don't disagree.
but
as far as I can
* libt...@cwilson.fastmail.fm wrote on Wed, Jul 01, 2009 at 12:11:45AM CEST:
On Tue, 30 Jun 2009 16:23 +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Can you convey the need for copyright assignment requirements for
nontrivial patches?
[*] The bulk of the patch is a template: there is only one way to
Den 2009-07-01 00:11 skrev libt...@cwilson.fastmail.fm:
On Tue, 30 Jun 2009 16:23 +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Why does gcc but not msvc need them?
It does. cl.exe has a flag that causes it to automatically invoke the
MSVC manifest tool (mt? I forget), AND link the resulting object into
the
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
But IANAL, so...
Me neither. I'm not making up these rules either, so please discuss
them with the FSF if you have an issue with them.
Nope, no issue. I didn't realize the FSF treated patches cumulatively.
You're right, Yaakov has submitted a number of these small
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Charles Wilson wrote on Wed, Jul 01, 2009 at 06:48:52AM CEST:
but
as far as I can tell we don't actually have separate cases for those
other languages' linker requirements at present. There's just C++, and
everything else:
Yes. What I am asking is do these
On Tue, 2009-06-30 at 20:35 +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Hello Michael,
I'm pretty short on review time ATM; sorry for not providing a detailed
review.
No problem. It's just that the hpux10.20 box is shot down tomorrow, so I
cannot test this platform any more.
* Michael Haubenwallner
Hello,
* Peter Rosin wrote on Wed, Jul 01, 2009 at 09:05:53AM CEST:
On Tue, 30 Jun 2009 16:23 +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Why does gcc but not msvc need them?
cl.exe will generate the manifest file all by itself, regardless of
executable name. My gripe was that any file created by libtool
On Wed, 01 Jul 2009 18:55 +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Peter Rosin wrote on Wed, Jul 01, 2009 at 09:05:53AM CEST:
On Tue, 30 Jun 2009 16:23 +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Why does gcc but not msvc need them?
cl.exe will generate the manifest file all by itself, regardless of
