Re: [libvirt] [PATCH 2/2] RPM spec file updated with glusterfs dependency

2009-09-02 Thread Daniel Veillard
On Tue, Sep 01, 2009 at 11:51:22AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 12:20:11AM +0200, Gerrit Slomma wrote: On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 05:47:56AM -0700, Harshavardhana wrote: Add new dependency for glusterfs rpm. [...] +# For glusterfs +Requires: glusterfs-client

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH 2/2] RPM spec file updated with glusterfs dependency

2009-09-01 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 12:20:11AM +0200, Gerrit Slomma wrote: On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 05:47:56AM -0700, Harshavardhana wrote: Add new dependency for glusterfs rpm. [...] +# For glusterfs +Requires: glusterfs-client = 2.0.2 %endif why 2.0.2 ? is taht a hard requirement ? In

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH 2/2] RPM spec file updated with glusterfs dependency

2009-08-28 Thread Gerrit Slomma
On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 05:47:56AM -0700, Harshavardhana wrote: Add new dependency for glusterfs rpm. [...] +# For glusterfs +Requires: glusterfs-client = 2.0.2 %endif why 2.0.2 ? is taht a hard requirement ? In Fedora/Rawhide we have only 2.0.1 at the moment, Daniel -- Daniel

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH 2/2] RPM spec file updated with glusterfs dependency

2009-08-28 Thread Harshavardhana
Hi Gerrit, Problem i can see here is the CentOS, RHEL and Scientific Linux never really built a package for 2.x releases of glusterfs and 1.3.x is really almost 2yr+ old. Having a dependency moved to 1.3.8 will actually break everything which glusterfs provides. 2.x are incompatible with

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH 2/2] RPM spec file updated with glusterfs dependency

2009-07-28 Thread Daniel Veillard
On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 05:47:56AM -0700, Harshavardhana wrote: Add new dependency for glusterfs rpm. [...] +# For glusterfs +Requires: glusterfs-client = 2.0.2 %endif why 2.0.2 ? is taht a hard requirement ? In Fedora/Rawhide we have only 2.0.1 at the moment, Daniel -- Daniel Veillard

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH 2/2] RPM spec file updated with glusterfs dependency

2009-07-28 Thread Harshavardhana
Hi Daniel, That release and above have few enhancements for VM related work, but the Fedora maintainer has not yet updated to our latest releases. I have communicated this to him but yet to receive a reply and when he will update with the latest release. I think you can remove the value its

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH 2/2] RPM spec file updated with glusterfs dependency

2009-07-28 Thread Mark McLoughlin
On Tue, 2009-07-28 at 15:23 +0530, Harshavardhana wrote: Hi Daniel, That release and above have few enhancements for VM related work, but the Fedora maintainer has not yet updated to our latest releases. I have communicated this to him but yet to receive a reply and when he will

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH 2/2] RPM spec file updated with glusterfs dependency

2009-07-08 Thread Daniel Veillard
On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 05:55:16PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 05:47:56AM -0700, Harshavardhana wrote: Add new dependency for glusterfs rpm. --- libvirt.spec.in |2 ++ 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/libvirt.spec.in

[libvirt] [PATCH 2/2] RPM spec file updated with glusterfs dependency

2009-07-07 Thread Harshavardhana
Add new dependency for glusterfs rpm. --- libvirt.spec.in |2 ++ 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/libvirt.spec.in b/libvirt.spec.in index 1e8a8ef..ccef3a5 100644 --- a/libvirt.spec.in +++ b/libvirt.spec.in @@ -86,6 +86,8 @@ BuildRequires: util-linux # For

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH 2/2] RPM spec file updated with glusterfs dependency

2009-07-07 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 05:47:56AM -0700, Harshavardhana wrote: Add new dependency for glusterfs rpm. --- libvirt.spec.in |2 ++ 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/libvirt.spec.in b/libvirt.spec.in index 1e8a8ef..ccef3a5 100644 --- a/libvirt.spec.in +++

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH 2/2] RPM spec file updated with glusterfs dependency

2009-07-07 Thread Harshavardhana
Daniel, Yes indeed but as in libvirt is a standalone project it should have its own dependencies. Right now this only effects the ovirt-node-image part. Was thinking of patching virt-manager also?. I have other doubts are you all planning for a generic function for mounting filesystems