STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL REQUEST FOR ASSISTANCE
From: Colmann Koroma
Tel: 0034 696 009 140
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ATTN
Dear Sir,
I am Colman Koroma from Sierra Leone. I am the son of late Dantata Koroma
the former chairman / board of
I propose a source-only distribution license that restricts commercial use
of binaries. I know it's on the border of the open source idea but if it
catches on we might see software written for commercial use as open source
software.
The restrictions it creates only affects commercial users and
Bernhard Fastenrath said on Sat, Mar 13, 2004 at 12:08:23PM -0500,:
html
head
titleSDL, Source Distribution License 1.0/title
/head
Posting in html are not a good idea.
h3Distribution of Executable Versions/h3
Redistribution in any other form than human readable source code in
Mahesh T. Pai wrote:
[...]
General consensus is that binaries are modified/derived versions of
sources.
AFAIK, The U.S. copyright office doesn't agree (the copyright
office regards the source code and object code as equivalent
for purposes of registration).
regards,
alexander.
--
The following link is the best work on license
law that I have ever found:
http://www.lawyerdude.8k.com/5943.html
Disaster lurks for those who do not comprehend
the difference between a *malefaction* and a
*benefaction* in copyright license law.
--
license-discuss archive is at
Well I commonly just lurk, but this is a good one.
I want to use as an example, an application API to JavaMail that I
planning to make OpenSource.
I am a pretty good developer, not the best though, but I have learned a
thing or two about how JavaMail works, and how it may be made to be a
little
daniel wallace scripsit:
The following link is the best work on license
law that I have ever found:
http://www.lawyerdude.8k.com/5943.html
Disaster lurks for those who do not comprehend
the difference between a *malefaction* and a
*benefaction* in copyright license law.
I do not
7 matches
Mail list logo
