Adaptive Public License v0.1C

2004-05-07 Thread Carmen Leeming
. (sections between '***' marks modified from 36 to 12 months) I invite further discussion and hope this license is now suitable for OSI approval. --Carmen Leeming -- license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3

Re: Adaptive Public License review

2004-04-22 Thread Carmen Leeming
John, thank you for taking the time to review the entire license. My responses to your comments/suggestions are embedded below: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ... SHOW-STOPPER: Though the APL is MPL-ish in nature, it has a few provisions modeled after the GPL, but intensified in such a way that I

Adaptive Public License

2004-04-15 Thread Carmen Leeming
support for use too, so we know that this is not a one-time application of the license. Please let me know if you have any further questions. Thank you, --Carmen Leeming University of Victoria -- license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3

Re: Adaptive Public License

2004-04-15 Thread Carmen Leeming
of existing licenses. We felt a more elegant solution was to have one license that our various research groups could use by simply modifying a few initial conditions. --Carmen Leeming -- license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3

Re: License Committee Report

2004-04-14 Thread Carmen Leeming
Hi Russell. I am still hoping to get approval for the Adaptive Public License. I have attached our follow-up from the last License Committee Report. --Carmen Leeming Carmen Leeming writes: Title: Adaptive Public License Submission: http://www.crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3:mss:6913

Adaptive Public License

2004-03-08 Thread Carmen Leeming
Does anyone have any further comments about the Adaptive Public License? --Carmen Russell Nelson wrote: Carmen Leeming writes: Title: Adaptive Public License Submission: http://www.crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3:mss:6913:200305:bogcdnbbhnfbgpdeahob License: http://www.mamook.net/APL.html

Re: License Committee report

2004-02-18 Thread Carmen Leeming
had entered the submission process, and received a reply indicating that it was received and was currently under review. I wrote again in November and never heard back. Can anyone give me an update and let me know if it is still under consideration? Thank you, Carmen Leeming -- license