> licensing conditions.
This is clearly false as regards acceptability to Debian.
I doubt very much that they have talked to OSI or to Ubuntu.
I have CC'd one of the OSI lists and legal@canonical.
As the three institutions whose names are being taken in vain, I think
it would be good for us to have a c
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes (The regrettable use of all in Section 7 of the GPL):
Is distribution of R still impossible because Stallman can't use
it?
Yes, it's impossible.
This is exactly what the GPL is designed to do. So it's `regrettable'
only if you don't agree with the GPL's goals. I
2 matches
Mail list logo
