Hello group,
I would like to talk to an expert about early history of Unix and the
publication of the kernel in the Lions book. Feel free to get in touch
with me.
kb
--
license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3
Hello,
Does anybody know whey I can get a list of IBM patents that have been
GPL'ed?
kb
--
license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3
I think Daniel makes an interesting point. But let me ask since you
emailed me your conversations. Who is the original owner of Linux?
kb
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2004 1:23 PM
To: daniel wallace
Cc: [EMAIL
that someone has
violated a copyright, doesn't the original owner have to make the
charge? Otherwise, we don't know where the true property rights
started right?
kb
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2004 3:21 PM
To: Ken Brown
Robert,
I am really interested in this stuff. First all, I have to say that I
suspect a tad bit of paranoia in the reporting about what's happening
overseas. What sources are you quoting that talk about criminalization
for patent infringement? I'd like to read that stuff. Russell McOrmond
was
: Friday, September 26, 2003 12:56 AM
To: Ken Brown
Subject: Re: For Approval: Open Source Software Alliance License
Ken Brown wrote:
Big Rick,
Your IBM funded-man Tony Stanco has the tape. You should ask him for a
copy. By the way, I see quite of bit of IBM money moving around Washington
Sean,
You are making some very legitimate points. Last year, Bruce Perens, one of
the most active proponents of the GPL, said the exact same thing at an open
source conference, the GPL has limited commercial applications.
kb
-Original Message-
From: Sean Chittenden [mailto:[EMAIL
guys are
getting to support our research.
kb
-Original Message-
From: Rick Moen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 6:24 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: For Approval: Open Source Software Alliance License
Quoting Ken Brown ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
You
the facts
of the case, the Red Hat suit and the direction of Linux licensing.
Ken Brown
AdTI
--
license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3
Peter,
Thanks for this. I have to tell you that you are really onto an
interesting point. I am not a lawyer, but I believe that there are some
legal points here that are probably unprecedented.
I believe this particularly because the GPL has not been interpreted on
any of these topics by a
: Thursday, October 31, 2002 7:33 AM
To: Ken Brown
Cc: Brendan Hide; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Copyright
Ken Brown wrote:
FSF has bullied a couple of developers, but hasn't had a judge rule
in their favor yet. When they win in a court of law, I'll open my
mind to their sales pitch a little more
-Original Message-
From: Brendan Hide [mailto:brendan;sacm.co.za]
Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 4:06 AM
To: Ken Brown; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Copyright
Ken Brown wrote:
Ex: I own a piece of property...but at anytime, anybody in the General
Public can use it, dig it up, change it, etc
Sujita,
This is a great question. I look forward to the group's response on this
one.
Ken Brown
AdTI
- Original Message -
From: Sujita Purushothaman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 5:35 AM
Subject: Copyright
Hello,
Are discussions
. Particularly when the license has such vague restrictions
for derivative works.
kb
-Original Message-
From: John Cowan [mailto:jcowan;reutershealth.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 3:01 PM
To: Ken Brown
Cc: John Cowan; Sujita Purushothaman; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Copyright
Ken
To: Ken Brown
Cc: John Cowan; Sujita Purushothaman; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Copyright
Ken Brown scripsit:
This answer is duplicitous.
I take offense at the application of this term to me.
duplicity: the belying of one's true intentions by deceptive words or
action
in the General
Public can use it, dig it up, change it, etc. How can you say I have
ownership of the property?
kb
-Original Message-
From: Humphreys, Noel [mailto:nhumphreys;AkinGump.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 1:38 PM
To: 'Ken Brown'; John Cowan; Sujita Purushothaman
Cc: [EMAIL
or not, explain to me how I could possibly
forbid anyone from making the change?
kb
-Original Message-
From: John Cowan [mailto:jcowan;reutershealth.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 2:16 PM
To: Ken Brown
Cc: John Cowan; Sujita Purushothaman; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Copyright
Ken
This answer is duplicitous. I think Sujita has a point. One of the central
purposes of the GPL is to discourage ownership...ie. sending the property
back into the realm of the General Public. To quote RS, to make the
property valueless commercially ...consequently free. A
Hello,
Does
anyone know approximately how many lines of code are in Unix and Linux?
kb
-Original
Message-
From: Fernando Velloso
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, May 04, 2002 8:02
PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: It's incompatible with
the GPL
After
This is pretty interesting. What hooks are you speaking of?
Ken Brown
-Original Message-
From: Ed Sutter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 7:57 AM
To: David Christensen
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES INC. MICROMONITOR SOFTWARE PUBLIC
A couple of things-
1) I take umbrage with law vs. law enforcement issues. I guess its b/c as a
public policy guy I notice that laws without teeth are more ineffective and
troublesome than no law at all. His point about forbidding transformation
is valid. Moreover, it speaks directly to his
Open source licenses may be diffuse, but property ownership law is very
clear. The law demands a distinction in the terms of any exchange in
property. Specifically ownership is described in terms of a lease, loan,
rent, etc. but it has to be very specific. Otherwise, regardless of Chris'
Karsten,
I you lost me on this. Why does time determine the terms of a sale?
Ken Brown
-Original Message-
From: Karsten M. Self [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 4:29 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Open source shareware?
on Thu, Nov 08, 2001 at 08:37
23 matches
Mail list logo
