First of all, and to be completely clear about this, our point is not to
make money with our project...
Let's start from another point of view.
On http://qt-project.org/downloads , we can read :
Qt is available under GPL v3, LGPL v2 and a commercial license.
Can we investigate this approach a
Hi,
Currently working on an open source project, we are looking for an
appropriate license for it.
We would like something that allows us to work with people in a way such
that :
- we can be informed of modifications of our program by developers,
- we can have our word to say about
On Thu, 03 Oct 2013 10:54:41 +0200
Quentin Lefebvre quentin.lefeb...@inria.fr wrote:
Hi,
Currently working on an open source project, we are looking for an
appropriate license for it.
We would like something that allows us to work with people in a way
such that :
- we can be informed
On Thu, 03 Oct 2013 15:59:38 +0200
Quentin Lefebvre quentin.lefeb...@inria.fr wrote:
First of all, and to be completely clear about this, our point is not
to make money with our project...
Let's start from another point of view.
On http://qt-project.org/downloads , we can read :
Qt is
At Joinup.eu, we had the question once regarding the use of the EUPL (or
the use of the CeCILL licence).
The answer is that you can enforce confidentiality (e.g. a NDA during the
development of the project, during an initial period) through a signed
contributor agreement (e.g. based on the
On 03/10/13 09:54, Quentin Lefebvre wrote:
This is the important part:
must do so exclusively on your behalf, under your direction and
control
It means that they cannot use it for their own purposes.
The GPL doesn't restrict internal use within an organisation, or the
keeping secret of
6 matches
Mail list logo
