Re: Viral licenses (was: wxWindows library...)

2003-12-16 Thread jacobus.vosloo
Alexander wrote John Cowan wrote: [...] computer scientist (HINAL) http://www.digital-law-online.com/lpdi1.0/treatise2.html [...] Added material is not itself a derivative work of the GPL'd thing, obviously. A binary, however, which combines them into a single object, probably

Re: Viral licenses (was: wxWindows library...)

2003-12-15 Thread Alexander Terekhov
John Cowan wrote: [...] You can't compare property in physical things directly to its copyright. If you replace the car by a detailed description of it (#1), and incorporate into that a detailed description of the gas pedal (#2) that has already been written, then #1 is indeed a

Re: Viral licenses (was: wxWindows library...)

2003-12-15 Thread Alexander Terekhov
John Cowan wrote: [...] computer scientist (HINAL) http://www.digital-law-online.com/lpdi1.0/treatise2.html [...] Added material is not itself a derivative work of the GPL'd thing, obviously. A binary, however, which combines them into a single object, probably is. I don't think so. I

Re: Viral licenses (was: wxWindows library...)

2003-12-14 Thread Rod Dixon, J.D., LL.M.
I just noticed that the Supreme Court denied cert in the case. : An interesting case to watch is Liu v. PriceWaterHouse, wherein you might : say the agreement at issue, if validly enforced, is viral as to the : third-party Chinese programmers in a similar way that the GPL might be. : : : See,

RE: Viral licenses (was: wxWindows library...)

2003-12-13 Thread amado.alves
I sense there are two senses to this word viral. I'm really interested in this so I'll appreciate any input. One sense is the GPL is viral because it spreads itself over derivatives i.e. forces derivatives to be distributed under GPL (if distributed at all, that is subsumed).* Is there

Re: Viral licenses (was: wxWindows library...)

2003-12-13 Thread Arnoud Engelfriet
amado.alves wrote: I sense there are two senses to this word viral. I'm really interested in this so I'll appreciate any input. One sense is the GPL is viral because it spreads itself over derivatives i.e. forces derivatives to be distributed under GPL (if distributed at all, that is

RE: Viral licenses (was: wxWindows library...)

2003-12-12 Thread Lawrence E. Rosen
terms; we're all scared of viruses. /Larry -Original Message- From: amado.alves [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 5:45 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Viral licenses (was: wxWindows library...) ...The GPL license is not viral

Re: Viral licenses (was: wxWindows library...)

2003-12-12 Thread Daniel Carrera
On Sat, Dec 13, 2003 at 01:44:48AM -, amado.alves wrote: ...The GPL license is not viral... I sense there are two senses to this word viral. I'm really interested in this so I'll appreciate any input. One sense is the GPL is viral because it spreads itself over derivatives i.e. forces