RE: [DotGNU]proposal: DotGNU Trademark License

--- Lawrence E. Rosen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: A bare trademark license is not allowed under trademark law. This license is the easiest way to lose the DotGNU service mark. /Larry Rosen Larry, Sorry for my late reply, I just noticed that today. Please excuse my ignorance, but what exactly

RE: [DotGNU]proposal: DotGNU Trademark License

James Michael DuPont wrote: Sorry for my late reply, I just noticed that today. Please excuse my ignorance, but what exactly do you mean by bare trademark license? Can you give me some hints on what to read up on? Just a few hints. I don't have time to give comprehensive legal answers about

LAB Public License proposal

Hello, Intending to use the following license for LAB Project, I need your advice and discussion about. It is an adapted version of http://www.opensource.org/licenses/cuaoffice.php modified to comply with both USA, French and EEC regulations. Only some minor formulations and definitions

RE: [DotGNU]proposal: DotGNU Trademark License

--- Lawrence E. Rosen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: James Michael DuPont wrote: Please excuse my ignorance, but what exactly do you mean by bare trademark license? Can you give me some hints on what to read up on? Just a few hints. I don't have time to give comprehensive legal answers