On Thu, 12 Feb 2004, Richard Schilling wrote:
I post my response because so many times on this list people try to
play armchair lawyer and pick apart a license. It's not
appropriate
Richard,
Could you please point me to this list charter or guidelines?
You seem to imply that only
On 2004.02.13 08:35 Alex Rousskov wrote:
On Thu, 12 Feb 2004, Richard Schilling wrote:
I post my response because so many times on this list people try to
play armchair lawyer and pick apart a license. It's not
appropriate
Richard,
Could you please point me to this list charter or
Ian Lance Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The arguments that the GPL is invalid are totally bogus.
I need to qualify that by saying that I'm referring to the arguments
which have appeared recently on the license-discuss list.
There are other theories that the GPL, while valid, does not have
Richard Schilling scripsit:
Look, folks the entire purpose of a license of any kind is to have
something to present to a judge in case something goes wrong, and to
clarify what rights are transferred to the end user. The true test of
a license (for open source work in a business) is what
Look, folks the entire purpose of a license of any kind is to have
something to present to a judge in case something goes wrong, and to
clarify what rights are transferred to the end user.
... and since the user is often not a lawyer, those who write licenses
should try to strike a balance
5 matches
Mail list logo
