After reviewing the existing approved licenses, our
team thought the Reciprocal Public License 1.1 meets
our needs, however our industrial affairs team wanted
to make some small changes.
Could you let me know if these 4 changes are reasonable,
or if we need to go through the new license approval
Hi Paul,
On Mar 19, 2004, at 7:29 AM, Fearn, Paul A./Urology wrote:
After reviewing the existing approved licenses, our
team thought the Reciprocal Public License 1.1 meets
our needs, however our industrial affairs team wanted
to make some small changes.
Could you let me know if these 4 changes
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 19, 2004 2:01 PM
To: Fearn, Paul A./Urology
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Use Reciprocal Public License or new license
Hi Paul,
On Mar 19, 2004, at 7:29 AM, Fearn, Paul A./Urology wrote:
After reviewing the existing approved licenses, our
team
To: Fearn, Paul A./Urology
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Use Reciprocal Public License or new license
Hi Paul,
On Mar 19, 2004, at 7:29 AM, Fearn, Paul A./Urology wrote:
After reviewing the existing approved licenses, our
team thought the Reciprocal Public License 1.1 meets
our needs, however our
4 matches
Mail list logo