On Sun, May 2, 2010 at 12:41, Anders Olofsson fl...@licq.org wrote:
Yes, I remember we said to do that in future releases. But should that apply
for 1.3.x as well? I thought we should do 1.3.x tags the old way for
consistency(?)
The old way must be considered a hack and I think we should go
On 2010-05-01 22:10, Erik Johansson wrote:
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 17:57, Anders Olofssonfl...@licq.org wrote:
I had a quick look at the packaging script and it looks like it should work
fine for the branch. However the tag script is gone so I'll have to grab an
old version and see if I can
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 17:57, Anders Olofsson fl...@licq.org wrote:
On 2010-04-24 16:23, Erik Johansson wrote:
On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 10:36, Anders Olofssonfl...@licq.org wrote:
It's been a few months since we released 1.3.8 and the 1.3 branch has
accumulated a bunch of corrections that I
On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 10:36, Anders Olofsson fl...@licq.org wrote:
It's been a few months since we released 1.3.8 and the 1.3 branch has
accumulated a bunch of corrections that I think would be nice to deliver to
our users.
I agree that it's time to release 1.3.9.
6) Next 1.3 version after
