[Lift] Re: Rails - Lift

2009-04-10 Thread Alexander Kellett
well, fwiw :P i eventually chose ideavim with intellij. best of both worlds. thanks all for the input! On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 10:20 PM, TylerWeir tyler.w...@gmail.com wrote: It's not an editor/IDE war unless someone brings up Vim or Emacs, so... I've been using Vim+Scala+Ctags since I

[Lift] Re: Rails - Lift

2009-04-10 Thread Timothy Perrett
I think a lot of people coming to scala from ruby are more familiar with the terminal and textmate style combination... using large IDE's with boat loads of features is more for people coming from a traditional java background. Thats not to say they don't have merit, of course they do, but I

[Lift] Re: Rails - Lift

2009-04-10 Thread David Pollak
I think this thread points out something important about Lift... what matters most is what works for you. There are plenty of people on this list that use one editor or another... use mapper or JPA... use lots of comet/ajax or use very little. The only thing that's right is what works for you...

[Lift] Re: Rails - Lift

2009-04-10 Thread Ben Diola
Does anyone know how to get a console in netbeans that I can run mvn scala:cc? On Apr 10, 8:12 am, David Pollak feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com wrote: I think this thread points out something important about Lift... what matters most is what works for you.  There are plenty of people on this

[Lift] Re: Rails - Lift

2009-04-09 Thread Warren Henning
You're proposing to scrap working code? Isn't that trying to fix something that isn't broken? Warren On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 8:58 PM, Charles F. Munat c...@munat.com wrote: I'm writing a proposal for a presentation on moving from Rails to Lift.

[Lift] Re: Rails - Lift

2009-04-09 Thread Jacob Grydholt Jensen
No, he is talking about *developers* switching from rails to lift, not projects. /grydholt --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Lift group. To post to this group, send email to liftweb@googlegroups.com

[Lift] Re: Rails - Lift

2009-04-09 Thread Charles F. Munat
Sorry, but I haven't got a clue what you're talking about. Chas. Warren Henning wrote: You're proposing to scrap working code? Isn't that trying to fix something that isn't broken? Warren On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 8:58 PM, Charles F. Munat c...@munat.com wrote: I'm writing a proposal

[Lift] Re: Rails - Lift

2009-04-09 Thread Alexander Kellett
actually my biggest blocker (and still my blocker) is getting a working coding environment. there is so much contradictory information on which ide is the best. it would be really nice to have a document that talks about the pro's and con's of each ide. in the rails/osx world its easy: use

[Lift] Re: Rails - Lift

2009-04-09 Thread David Pollak
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 2:38 AM, Alexander Kellett lypa...@gmail.com wrote: actually my biggest blocker (and still my blocker) is getting a working coding environment. there is so much contradictory information on which ide is the best. it would be really nice to have a document that talks

[Lift] Re: Rails - Lift

2009-04-09 Thread Timothy Perrett
On the contrary... Im coding in TextMate right now: it works perfect! I run scala:cc in a terminal window and just code away in TextMate. Job done. Tim On 09/04/2009 10:38, Alexander Kellett lypa...@gmail.com wrote: in the rails/osx world its easy: use textmate unless you have a

[Lift] Re: Rails - Lift

2009-04-09 Thread Clemens Oertel
I don't think it's necessary to make a final decision about your IDE at any time. AFAIK, all major IDEs work quite well with Maven's pom files, so it's very easy to switch IDEs at any time. I for instance used NetBeans until last month, when JetBrains updated their Scala plugin - then I

[Lift] Re: Rails - Lift

2009-04-09 Thread Josh Suereth
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 9:42 AM, Clemens Oertel clemens.oer...@gmail.comwrote: I don't think it's necessary to make a final decision about your IDE at any time. AFAIK, all major IDEs work quite well with Maven's pom files, so it's very easy to switch IDEs at any time. WOAAAH I beg to

[Lift] Re: Rails - Lift

2009-04-09 Thread Charles F. Munat
Ah, I get it now. Jacob Grydholt Jensen wrote: No, he is talking about *developers* switching from rails to lift, not projects. /grydholt --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Lift group. To

[Lift] Re: Rails - Lift

2009-04-09 Thread Charles F. Munat
This is interesting. I'll think about this. Thanks. Chas. Alexander Kellett wrote: actually my biggest blocker (and still my blocker) is getting a working coding environment. there is so much contradictory information on which ide is the best. it would be really nice to have a document

[Lift] Re: Rails - Lift

2009-04-09 Thread Charles F. Munat
I was thinking that I'd start with Textmate, since I've used that the most and it's what most Rails developers use, and then move to NetBeans, since that seems to be pretty popular. But I could take a quick look at Eclipse, too. David Pollak wrote: On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 2:38 AM,

[Lift] Re: Rails - Lift

2009-04-09 Thread TylerWeir
It's not an editor/IDE war unless someone brings up Vim or Emacs, so... I've been using Vim+Scala+Ctags since I started. I'd recommend not getting hung-up on which editor is the best just start coding. On Apr 9, 3:01 pm, Charles F. Munat c...@munat.com wrote: I was thinking that I'd start

[Lift] Re: Rails - Lift

2009-04-09 Thread Charles F. Munat
Can't do them all, but I'd mention Emacs and Vim. Maybe show a slide of what they look like. Chas. TylerWeir wrote: It's not an editor/IDE war unless someone brings up Vim or Emacs, so... I've been using Vim+Scala+Ctags since I started. I'd recommend not getting hung-up on which editor