Hi,
@Tim
I don't have more info than the announce of 2.1.0-m1 or the following article :
* http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg89838.html
* http://blogs.sonatype.com/john/2008/09/19/1221844609400.html
(and I didn't find time to test the new version of maven)
@Derek
Jesse Eichar
Awesome. Am I reading that right that you could essentially embed scala code
right in the POM?
On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 1:50 PM, David Bernard [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
Hi,
@Tim
I don't have more info than the announce of 2.1.0-m1 or the following
article :
*
Hey Derek,
I know about this command :-)
My observation (of my friend at least) is that his reaction was holy-
cow, i need to learn this build tool, a new language and a new
framework. The language and framework part you cant get away from
invariably but perhaps we can do something on the build
I agree on the Maven mojo programming. Anything to simplify custom build
scripts would be great, so SBT sounds like an interesting idea. I didn't
mean to imply that it was a bad idea, just that you don't need all of the
-Ds :)
Derek
On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 9:46 AM, Tim Perrett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Looks interesting. I subscribed to the list to keep an eye on it.
Ty
On Oct 5, 1:59 pm, Tim Perrett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Guys,
Check this out:
http://code.google.com/p/simple-build-tool/
It appeared a couple of days ago - im wondering if its something we
could customize to make
I don't see a downside to providing an alternative build system to people
who are very Maven-averse (as long as I don't have to maintain it!, heh)
But yeah, replacing Maven at this point seems unwise, unless there are very
compelling reasons.
--j
On Sun, Oct 5, 2008 at 12:15 PM, David
On Sun, Oct 5, 2008 at 10:59 AM, Tim Perrett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Guys,
Check this out:
http://code.google.com/p/simple-build-tool/
It appeared a couple of days ago - im wondering if its something we
could customize to make starting lift projects easier? Its all written
in scala so
I took a quick look at it. like make, ant, builr the main issue I've
got with it's it require scala to be installed and to don't manage the
version of scala use to build you're project. And I suspect it could
only build scala-project that used the same version as the tools
itself.
But I pro a
There's no *requirement* to use all of the -D stuff. If you just do
mvn -U archetype:generate
you actually get a nice list of archetypes, two of which are:
31: internal - lift-archetype-blank (A blank/empty liftweb project)
32: internal - lift-archetype-basic (The basic (liftweb) project)
If
