[Lift] Re: Problems with persistence context (Lift/JPA)

2008-09-04 Thread Oliver
Actually to extend on that, Can would be a useful addition to a non lift library. Lift appears to very non anemic Model objects which I believe know how to persist themselves, how to validate and how to write themselves to html (hence my just kidding on breaking them into separate jars). I can

[Lift] Re: Please Welcome Francois Bertrand to the Lift Committers

2008-09-04 Thread Daniel Green
Welcome! Great to have you aboard :-). On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 10:10 PM, Francois Bertrand [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks to all. It has been fun for me to work with Liftweb and Scala during the last two months. This cool effect and the fact that Liftweb/Scala integrate so well with Java,

[Lift] Re: Problems with persistence context (Lift/JPA)

2008-09-04 Thread David Pollak
On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 11:37 PM, Oliver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Actually to extend on that, Can would be a useful addition to a non lift library. One of the projects that DavidB was working on was splitting up Lift Webkit into modules. Then he got a job that requires a long commute, and

[Lift] Re: Problems with persistence context (Lift/JPA)

2008-09-04 Thread Oliver Lambert
On 04/09/2008, at 11:28 PM, David Pollak wrote: On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 11:37 PM, Oliver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Actually to extend on that, Can would be a useful addition to a non lift library. One of the projects that DavidB was working on was splitting up Lift Webkit into modules.

[Lift] Re: NetBeans Scala plugin running Maven and lift

2008-09-04 Thread bradford
It's been reported that mvn eclipse:eclipse works for getting the source to show up in Netbeans. Would it be possible to create a mvn netbeans:netbeans so this would be a little more intuitive, though I am not quite sure what else mvn eclipse:eclipse does. On Sep 4, 11:16 am, bradford [EMAIL

[Lift] Re: Problems with persistence context (Lift/JPA)

2008-09-04 Thread Derek Chen-Becker
For dependency injection in this case you can just use a mock JNDI provider to handle dependency injection. Of course, you can always use Spring or some other IoC framework to inject the dependencies; Scala objects and classes, after all, are really just Java classes. Derek On Thu, Sep 4, 2008

[Lift] Re: bind and node attributes

2008-09-04 Thread Daniel Green
Because Elem is a subclass of NodeSeq, NodeSeq = NodeSeq and Elem = NodeSeq mean the same thing. This is at the heart of my misunderstanding. I had wrongfully assumed that the function was being passed a sequence of the children, which seemed strange to me so I asked. I was looking for the

[Lift] Re: bind and node attributes

2008-09-04 Thread David Pollak
S.attr(columns) = Full(2) When a Snippet is invoked, the attributes of the lift:... tag are made available in S.attr() Daniel Green wrote: Because Elem is a subclass of NodeSeq, NodeSeq = NodeSeq and Elem = NodeSeq mean the same thing. This is at the heart of my misunderstanding. I