Hi Squad
As many have said, there are countless ways to introduce the MoQ to a
person. Since we only have 45 minutes, we can't tell them all, so which
one do we pick?
We could, as Diana suggested, reduce the MoQ to some short principles, or
to be really brief, just the one sentence - Good is a
Hi Roger, David and Squad
[Rog]If I wanted to "go to DQ", which direction should I head?
You should go in a non-direction, like Monty Python's 100m for people with
no sense of direction.
Everyone is talking about "things" being more or less DQ, but it all becomes
much easier if we talk about
Hi Rich
You wrote:
Dynamic Quality IS the Subject
static Quality are THE objects
This really got my attention. If this was the case, it would mean
that the MoQ is the same as SOM, right? The most fundamental MoQ
terms would be the same as the most fundamental SOM terms. What
Hi Squad
T-6 days to June so start posting topic suggestions for the next month
right away. Suggestions will be collected until 29/5, then the voting
will start 30/5. Hold your votes until then, I'll post a call for votes
when it's time.
Magnus
MOQ Online - http://www.moq.org
Hi Squad
There weren't that many suggestions for June but here they are.
Go ahead and vote until May 31 24:00 GMT
Magnus
1. We know about the levels inorganic, biological, social, intellectual, BUT
let's take a closer look at moral codes. Pirsig argues that there are five
moral
I vote for number 2
2) DENIS POISSON (VIA BODVAR):
If DNA is the "machine code" between the inorganic and the biological,
what's the "machine code" between the biological and the social? Between
the social and the intellect (mythos? language?) How do they work?
Magnus
MOQ.org -
comes
to mind and I would happily accept such an argument but we have the
Strawsons of this world to cope with. Magnus Berg always stressed the
universality of a metaphysics, there's nothing outside it. The map
metaphor suggests an (objective) reality that we constantly keep
mapping, but Pirsig
Hi Denis and Squad
That's a truly unique feature, you can't have a cup of coffee inside itself.
You can't have any other type of pattern inside itself.
Right. But it's language, not Intellect, that has that propriety.
In my previous post, I truncated the official definition for
