On 3 Jun 2009, at 00:16, Peter Chubb wrote:
Hans (Isn't there a timing problem at the second triplet?)
There is --- it's to do the gruppetto at the end of the trill, that
seems to interfere with the first note of the triplet in the MIDI
output. It's not something I can fix with articulate.
Why didn't this patch work?
http://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=lilypond.git;a=commitdiff;h=269248a11ada074066deb061d64df70ee7b4deec
I changed \var{} to \code{} but it still shows up as \var{} in the
html.
Mark Polesky a écrit :
Why didn't this patch work?
http://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=lilypond.git;a=commitdiff;h=269248a11ada074066deb061d64df70ee7b4deec
I changed \var{} to \code{} but it still shows up as \var{} in the
html.
On Tue, Jun 02, 2009 at 04:30:36PM +0200, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
Op dinsdag 02-06-2009 om 07:02 uur [tijdzone -0700], schreef Graham
Percival:
AttributeError: 'Odcctools__darwin__x86' object has no attribute
'build_bits'
Ah, that should prolly be self.settings. I'll wait a bit until
Werner LEMBERG wrote:
http://www.jonathankulp.com/stable-devel.pdf
BTW, to run stable and development versions in parallel, I do it a bit
differently:
. `stable': Configure and install as normal.
. `devel': Configure with
./configure --prefix=/usr/local/test
and install as
Maybe I should add your method as well?
I think it's not worth the trouble. I'm just used to my habit, and it
probably really hasn't great benefits.
Werner
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Op woensdag 03-06-2009 om 04:06 uur [tijdzone -0700], schreef Graham
Percival:
Ok, it works with self.settings, and it's required for darwin__ppc
and darwin__x86. I'm not certain if you'd rather put one code
block into the main odcctools class, or add subclasses for both
__ppc and __x86.
I've attached a patch with the Makefile addition to the Learning Manual and
an addition to the Contributor's Guide showing how to run stable and devel
versions at once. It also has some updates for CG changing make web to
make doc according to the new make targets. Would someone with push access
2009/6/2 Han-Wen Nienhuys hanw...@gmail.com:
Hi guys,
I pushed a new lily release (actually that happened on sunday, but due
to the savannah problems, the website did not show it). It was made
with an updated GUB version (it now ships Ghostscript 8.65). Please
have a ride and tell me if
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 10:00 AM, Francisco Vila paconet@gmail.com wrote:
2009/6/2 Han-Wen Nienhuys hanw...@gmail.com:
Hi guys,
I pushed a new lily release (actually that happened on sunday, but due
to the savannah problems, the website did not show it). It was made
with an updated GUB
Patrick McCarty wrote:
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 10:00 AM, Francisco Vila paconet@gmail.com wrote:
2009/6/2 Han-Wen Nienhuys hanw...@gmail.com:
Hi guys,
I pushed a new lily release (actually that happened on sunday, but due
to the savannah problems, the website did not show it). It was made
2009/6/3 Jonathan Kulp jonlancek...@gmail.com:
Is this problem related to the binary posted at lilypond.org?
Exactly, which Han-wen asked to try.
I have no
problems with the 2.13.1 I build from source.
Neither do I, but it uses your existing GS install, not latest GS
pre-release as GUB does.
On XP it creates .pdf file successfully but there are error messages in the
terminal:
# -*-compilation-*-
Processing `C:/Documents and Settings/Jon/Desktop/213test.ly'
Parsing...
Interpreting music...
Preprocessing graphical objects...
programming error: FT_Get_Glyph_Name () error: invalid
On Wed, Jun 03, 2009 at 12:36:24PM -0500, Jonathan Kulp wrote:
Patrick McCarty wrote:
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 10:00 AM, Francisco Vila paconet@gmail.com
wrote:
2009/6/2 Han-Wen Nienhuys hanw...@gmail.com:
Hi guys,
I pushed a new lily release (actually that happened on sunday, but due
If it would help, I can test on Xubuntu 9.04, OSX 10.4, Windows XP and
Windows 7.
Certainly! I'm sure not many people are testing on Windows 7 yet, so
this information would be helpful.
-Patrick
On Windows 7 it has the same terminal error messages as it did in XP:
#
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 3:04 PM, Patrick McCarty pnor...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, I was testing the GUB binary at lilypond.org.
I have just confirmed the problem on 64-bit GNU/Linux too.
The problem seems to be exactly what the error message reports: there
is no file gs_init.ps located in the
On Wed, Jun 03, 2009 at 08:43:59AM -0500, Jonathan Kulp wrote:
I've attached a patch with the Makefile addition to the Learning Manual
and an addition to the Contributor's Guide showing how to run stable and
devel versions at once. It also has some updates for CG changing make
web
Cameron Horsburgh wrote:
On Wed, Jun 03, 2009 at 08:43:59AM -0500, Jonathan Kulp wrote:
I've attached a patch with the Makefile addition to the Learning Manual
and an addition to the Contributor's Guide showing how to run stable and
devel versions at once. It also has some updates for
2009/5/29 Han-Wen Nienhuys hanw...@gmail.com:
LGTM
Applied.
Cheers,
Neil
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
19 matches
Mail list logo
