Marc Hohl wrote Saturday, August 22, 2009 7:30 PM
Jay Anderson schrieb:
[...]
So what do you think? Should the SmallStaff just
be left as a snippet?
If it is a snippet ideally I'd want to do something like:
\include small_staff.lyi
\score {
\new SmallStaff {...}
}
How would one make
[git dd442f49]
This simple input
\relative {
\repeat unfold 31 { c'1 r r r r r r r }
}
makes the vertical layout overflow instead of properly filling two
pages. If you slightly increase the repeat factor, the lowest staves
even fall off the bottom of the page.
Werner
inline:
[git dd442f49]
There is a horizontal offset bug if a markup is attached to a skip.
Look at this small example:
\paper {
ragged-right = ##f
}
foo = {
s1
\time 7/8 s8*7^foobar
\time 10/8
}
bar = {
R1
R8*7
}
\context Staff = foo \foo
\context Staff
Any idea how to fix my issue?
Change MultiMeasureRestText #'outside-staff-priority so it's lower
than TextScript #'outside-staff-priority.
OK.
Shall this be added to the bug tracker as a regression?
I don't think so; we just need to agree on a more appropriate value
than the current
Trevor Daniels schrieb:
Marc Hohl wrote Saturday, August 22, 2009 7:30 PM
Jay Anderson schrieb:
[...]
So what do you think? Should the SmallStaff just
be left as a snippet?
If it is a snippet ideally I'd want to do something like:
\include small_staff.lyi
\score {
\new SmallStaff {...}
http://codereview.appspot.com/109071/diff/39/46
File lily/phrasing-slur-engraver.cc (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/109071/diff/39/46#newcode147
Line 147: if (!g-internal_has_interface (ly_symbol2scm
(span-bar-interface)))
this will work in some cases, but is specific to the ordering of
Werner LEMBERG wrote:
[Sorry if this has already been dealt with; I'm abroad, with no access
to the internet.]
This change
+ convert -depth 8 \
-alpha Off \
-background white \
-layers flatten \
-trim \
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 23 August 2009 02:16:15 Carl Sorensen wrote:
On 8/22/09 5:13 PM, Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
If this change uses \newcr or \crnew or whatever, then fine. If
it redefines the behavior of \cresc, then I recommend
Hello,
What's the easiest way to do text spanners with, say, three or
four words? So something like:
accel.---meno mosso---rit.---a tempo
I've tried using above-staff decrescendo and setting the text as needed,
which does work, but then I have to create another layer if there are also
On Sat, Aug 22, 2009 at 6:24 PM, Andrew Hawrylukahawry...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Aug 22, 2009 at 4:53 PM, Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca
wrote:
On Sat, Aug 22, 2009 at 02:34:40PM -0600, Andrew Hawryluk wrote:
All of the @sourceimage commands are causing build problems:
Okay to apply?
Thanks.
- Mark
From 29f3105e26c3dfdde1f265a93e4392e79ce3aeb2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mark Polesky markpole...@yahoo.com
Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2009 12:08:36 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] Docs: IR 4 Scheme functions: Improve docstrings.
---
lily/context-scheme.cc | 39
On 2009-08-23, Alexander Kobel wrote:
Werner LEMBERG wrote:
[Sorry if this has already been dealt with; I'm abroad, with no access
to the internet.]
This change
+convert -depth 8 \
-alpha Off \
-background white \
-layers flatten \
2009/8/23 Mark Polesky markpole...@yahoo.com:
Okay to apply?
No, since you've changed the names of function arguments while leaving
the original names in the body of the function:
- 2, 0, 0, (SCM context, SCM name),
- Return the definition of @var{name} (a symbol) within
+
On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 06:08:35PM +0200, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
As for (b), I wanted to add png versions:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2009-08/msg00730.html
but I've been told off in the past for adding files that could be
added automatically.
Basically, I agree, but
On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 07:57:26PM +0200, Reinhold Kainhofer wrote:
On Sunday 23 August 2009 02:16:15 Carl Sorensen wrote:
Yes, we should call it \newcresc, and indicate in the documentation
that \cresc is deprecated.
...
So,for now I would simply apply that patch so that the properties get
Op zondag 23 augustus 2009, schreef Jonathan Wilkes:
accel.---meno mosso---rit.---a tempo
I've tried using above-staff decrescendo and setting the text as needed,
which does work, but then I have to create another layer if there are also
hairpins.
I used this solution but most times I put
Werner LEMBERG wrote Saturday, August 22, 2009 7:23 AM
There is a horizontal offset bug if a markup is attached to a
skip.
Look at this small example:
\paper {
ragged-right = ##f
}
foo = {
s1
\time 7/8 s8*7^foobar
\time 10/8
}
bar = {
R1
R8*7
}
\context Staff
2009/8/22 Werner LEMBERG w...@gnu.org:
Hmm. I currently can't imagine a situation where a value 0 is
needed, so I vote to remove the setting of #'outside-staff-priority
for MultiMeasureRestText -- however, I'm not sure whether this has any
influence to issue #495 (this looks rather
Carl Sorensen schrieb:
On 8/22/09 12:11 PM, Marc Hohl m...@hohlart.de wrote:
Carl Sorensen schrieb:
On 8/22/09 3:47 AM, Marc Hohl m...@hohlart.de wrote:
[moved from -user]
According to Neil's proposals and Carl's annotations, I created a patch
to enhance the automatic
Carl Sorensen wrote:
Here's what I recommend (I didn't used to do this, but it
seems to be a better way to work).
git branch newfeature
git checkout newfeature
git rebase -i master
git rebase -I SHA1-ID-of-the-parent-of-branch-newfeature
git checkout master
git pull
git cherry-pick
Mark Polesky wrote Sunday, August 23, 2009 11:16 PM
Carl Sorensen wrote:
Here's what I recommend (I didn't used to do this, but it
seems to be a better way to work).
git branch newfeature
git checkout newfeature
git rebase -i master
git rebase -I SHA1-ID-of-the-parent-of-branch-newfeature
Symptom: I compile lilypond on master. I switch to web-gop, do
some stuff, then switch back to master. There's no makefile. No
problem; I run ./autogen.sh. That appears to finish correctly,
but when I try make, I get:
gperc...@sapphire:~/src/lilypond$ nice make
***
From: Trevor Daniels [t.dani...@treda.co.uk]
Sent: Sunday, August 23, 2009 4:53 PM
To: Mark Polesky; Carl Sorensen; Marc Hohl
Cc: Lily-Devel List
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Enhancement: automatic polyphony in different
\...Staffcontexts
Mark Polesky wrote
Neil Puttock wrote:
No, since you've changed the names of function arguments while leaving
the original names in the body of the function...
(facepalm)
how's this then?
- Mark
From 66f5bf48a8708cabf878501fea6fa90e9fc31e69 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mark Polesky
24 matches
Mail list logo
