On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 06:20:31PM +, Peekay Ex wrote:
However the Contributor Guide has
I think you're looking at the 2.14 CG ? or maybe from 2.13 ?
That section in git looks different. You should remove Dmytro,
and check with Brett.
- Graham
On Oct 31, 2011, at 6:18 PM, m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
On Oct 31, 2011, at 3:19 PM, Phil Holmes wrote:
Mike - do you have a Windows machine? And a Windows .exe for your changes?
If so, you could run my pixel comparator.
--
Phil Holmes
Unfortunately, I don't have a Windows
On 2011/11/01 08:25:48, mike_apollinemike.com wrote:
Given that the 0.6 skyline horizontal padding is,
according to the comment above it, only intended to block ledger lines
from
overlapping a bar line, I think that this blocking effect it has on
horizontal
spacing is an unintended side
On Nov 1, 2011, at 12:52 AM, Keith OHara wrote:
This fixes the SpanBar regression ID'd by Phil.
Well, not exactly. The failing regression test said:
texidoc = SpanBars participate in the horizontal collision system;
the accidentals should not collide with the bar lines.
This patch
I noticed that we already have \hideNotes and \unHideNotes, but that
is rather clumsy when you only want to hide a single note. So I wrote
a patch to add \hideNote, and as a newbie to Lilypond development I
wanted to check that this was a sensible idea. The patch is here,
although I haven't
Il 31/10/2011 21:05, Francisco Vila ha scritto:
you haven't applied it yet, right?
Now it is; please pull, test it and tell me.
Ok, thanks.
Well, I had tested it before and I knew what it would have happened.
'make check-translation' is a mess now.
If you run this command you'll see what I
Hello,
On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 9:35 AM, Nick Payne nick.pa...@internode.on.net wrote:
See below - the dots are differently placed depending on whether the notes
are in one voice or two:
\version 2.15.16
\relative c' {
d a d,4.
{ d } \\ { a d, }
}
Julien,
On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 12:22 AM, Julien Rioux
jri...@physics.utoronto.ca wrote:
Hi,
Can somebody please push these to patches? They were accepted in a countdown
over a week ago (I think it was 20111023) but they initially caused some
conflicts when the time came to push them.
I can
Hi all,
I am sure other more experienced programmers will chime in but having
two 'similar' functions
\hideNote
\hideNotes
Is a good idea.
I thought we had settled on \functionOn and \functionOff (e.g., \sustainOn and
\sustainOff).
So we should have \hideNotesOn and \hideNotesOff,
On Tue, Nov 01, 2011 at 01:32:13PM +, Peekay Ex wrote:
On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 12:22 AM, Julien Rioux
jri...@physics.utoronto.ca wrote:
Can somebody please push these to patches? They were accepted in a countdown
over a week ago (I think it was 20111023) but they initially caused some
Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca writes:
On Tue, Nov 01, 2011 at 01:32:13PM +, Peekay Ex wrote:
On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 12:22 AM, Julien Rioux
jri...@physics.utoronto.ca wrote:
Can somebody please push these to patches? They were accepted in a
countdown
over a week ago (I
Hello,
On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 1:45 PM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca writes:
On Tue, Nov 01, 2011 at 01:32:13PM +, Peekay Ex wrote:
On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 12:22 AM, Julien Rioux
jri...@physics.utoronto.ca wrote:
Can somebody please push
Adam,
On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 2:28 PM, Adam Spiers
lilypond-de...@adamspiers.org wrote:
On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 12:23 PM, Peekay Ex pkx1...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 10:21 AM, Adam Spiers
lilypond-de...@adamspiers.org wrote:
I noticed that we already have \hideNotes and
Adam,
On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 2:29 PM, Adam Spiers
lilypond-de...@adamspiers.org wrote:
On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 1:35 PM, Kieren MacMillan
kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca wrote:
I am sure other more experienced programmers will chime in but having
two 'similar' functions
\hideNote
\hideNotes
Adam,
On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 2:28 PM, Adam Spiers
lilypond-de...@adamspiers.org wrote:
...
Please feel free to create a new issue to track this.
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2002
--
--
James
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 3:15 PM, Peekay Ex pkx1...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 2:28 PM, Adam Spiers lilypond-de...@adamspiers.org
wrote:
Thanks James. I'm a little confused regarding snippets: I was aware
that files in Documentation/snippets are autogenerated from files in
On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 2:10 PM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Peekay Ex pkx1...@gmail.com writes:
Yes and I suppose that is why I cannot push these patches to dev\staging
--snip--
jlowe@jlowe-lilybuntu2:~/lilypond-git$ git push origin
HEAD:refs/heads/dev/staging
To
Peekay Ex pkx1...@gmail.com writes:
On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 2:10 PM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Peekay Ex pkx1...@gmail.com writes:
Yes and I suppose that is why I cannot push these patches to dev\staging
--snip--
jlowe@jlowe-lilybuntu2:~/lilypond-git$ git push origin
On Nov 1, 2011, at 4:39 PM, Adam Spiers wrote:
On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 3:17 PM, Peekay Ex pkx1...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 2:29 PM, Adam Spiers
lilypond-de...@adamspiers.org wrote:
On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 1:35 PM, Kieren MacMillan
kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca wrote:
Ah, that
Kieren MacMillan kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca writes:
Hi all,
I am sure other more experienced programmers will chime in but having
two 'similar' functions
\hideNote
\hideNotes
Is a good idea.
I thought we had settled on \functionOn and \functionOff (e.g.,
\sustainOn and
I have finally figured out how to reproduce these regressions,
and am working on a fix.
http://codereview.appspot.com/4981052/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Hi David,
Or we just define \once as a music function doing that and remove it
from the parser altogether. Should be slightly less efficient and quite
more convenient.
I've been wanting that to be true since the very first time I ever used \once…
Cheers,
Kieren.
I'm starting to get the hang of regression tests, but my
build/out/test-results/index.html shows a very large number of entries
referring to *.profile files. I assume this is something to do with
performance, but for once the Contributor's Guide isn't much help;
On Tue, Nov 01, 2011 at 03:39:23PM +, Adam Spiers wrote:
Perfect thanks. I'm pretty sure I've *never* seen a better documented
F/OSS project. The level of attention to detail is incredible,
although as a newbie developer it's a double-edged sword - on the one
hand it's comforting to know
mike at apollinemike.com mike at apollinemike.com writes:
-) TabStaffs tend to make horizontal spacing tighter, as the average spring
between paper columns has an
ideal length that is shorter than that of staves comprised of normal notes.
Very true. The lack of time-signature and
Kieren MacMillan kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca writes:
Hi David,
Or we just define \once as a music function doing that and remove it
from the parser altogether. Should be slightly less efficient and quite
more convenient.
I've been wanting that to be true since the very first time I ever
mike at apollinemike.com mike at apollinemike.com writes:
So if we take this patch, we should probably change the regression test,
as well, because the SpanBars will not actually be participating in the
horizontal collision system.
(e.g., if somebody does \remove Bar_engraver, the
I used the following for helping me understand conflicts in the parser.
When one uses
bison -v -g lily/parser.yy
and has some problematic state for which one does not know a good
example of how it might get reached, one can load the generated
parser.dot into Emacs, and after using M-x load-file
David,
On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 3:55 PM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Peekay Ex pkx1...@gmail.com writes:
On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 2:10 PM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Peekay Ex pkx1...@gmail.com writes:
Yes and I suppose that is why I cannot push these patches to dev\staging
On 11/1/11 4:30 PM, Peekay Ex pkx1...@gmail.com wrote:
David,
On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 3:55 PM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Peekay Ex pkx1...@gmail.com writes:
On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 2:10 PM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Peekay Ex pkx1...@gmail.com writes:
Yes and I suppose that
2011/10/31 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org:
The syntax changed in incompatible ways. Appropriate changes to
convertrules.py were made, and update-with-convert-ly was run on the
tree including the translations, keeping the translations compilable but
untranslated. No manual changes were made to
I'm trying to make sure my patches include the right tweaks to the
documentation, but as a newbie to lilypond development (but with a lot
of development experience elsewhere), I'm sorry to say I'm really
struggling :-(
`make doc' works, but takes too long to be of practical use except as
a final
On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 8:05 AM, Peekay Ex pkx1...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes sorry I was looking at an old PDF.
I'll update the list myself and put myself in Dmytro's place for now
and leave Brett in until I hear different.
Yep, I'm still here!
--
Brett W. McCoy --
On 11/1/11 5:44 PM, Adam Spiers lilypond-de...@adamspiers.org wrote:
I'm trying to make sure my patches include the right tweaks to the
documentation, but as a newbie to lilypond development (but with a lot
of development experience elsewhere), I'm sorry to say I'm really
struggling :-(
`make
Got nothing tonight, see you Thursday!
Colin
--
I've learned that you shouldn't go through life with a catcher's mitt on both
hands.
You need to be able to throw something back.
-Maya Angelou, poet (1928- )
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
Carl,
On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 10:42 PM, Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu wrote:
On 11/1/11 4:30 PM, Peekay Ex pkx1...@gmail.com wrote:
David,
On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 3:55 PM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
..
For single patches, this is reasonably simple. First do
git rebase
36 matches
Mail list logo
