Francisco Vila paconet@gmail.com writes:
2011/12/13 Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu:
On 12/13/11 7:06 AM, gra...@percival-music.ca gra...@percival-music.ca
wrote:
Second draft uploaded; more robust with rebases instead of merge.
Question: the old docs want translators to avoid
Ian Hulin i...@hulin.org.uk writes:
Hi David,
On 13/12/11 22:40, David Kastrup wrote:
Ian Hulin i...@hulin.org.uk writes:
Hi all, ..snip..
I'd like to deprecate this as I think it's nasty, smelly, evil
and kludgy
Care to explain why being able to use the same syntax as one uses
in
2011/12/14 Martin Tarenskeen m.tarensk...@zonnet.nl:
Hi,
When I load a Lilypond-created pdf file in Evince I see a lot of
error/warning messages in my console. The PDF looks and prints fine though.
Anything to worry about ?
I am working on Linux Fedora 16, using lilypond 2.15.21
On Wed, 14 Dec 2011, Francisco Vila wrote:
2011/12/14 Martin Tarenskeen m.tarensk...@zonnet.nl:
Hi,
When I load a Lilypond-created pdf file in Evince I see a lot of
error/warning messages in my console. The PDF looks and prints fine though.
Anything to worry about ?
I am working on Linux
Hi,
When I load a Lilypond-created pdf file in Evince I see a lot of
error/warning
messages in my console. The PDF looks and prints fine though.
Anything to worry about ?
I am working on Linux Fedora 16, using
lilypond 2.15.21
evince-3.2.1
ghostscript-9.04
Attached: the output from my
Graham Percival writes:
Almost everybody wants stable releases more frequently. They
attract positive attention
Are you sure? On what fora was the 2.14 release announced? Did it
eventually make lwn.net? Has anyone checked how many followers we have
on FB or Twitter (MuseScore, anyone?).
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 10:55:04AM +0100, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
Graham Percival writes:
Almost everybody wants stable releases more frequently. They
attract positive attention
Are you sure?
It attracted positive attention on lilypond-user. I never said
*how* much attention it
Graham Percival writes:
It attracted positive attention on lilypond-user. I never said
*how* much attention it received.
Right.
Well, I personally don't care. If somebody wants to work on
advertising, or even better, work on things which encourage other
people to do advertising for us,
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 11:36:06AM +0100, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
Graham Percival writes:
Well, I personally don't care. If somebody wants to work on
advertising, or even better, work on things which encourage other
people to do advertising for us, they're welcome to do so.
Now,
Jan Nieuwenhuizen jann...@gnu.org writes:
Graham Percival writes:
At the moment, the top 3 problems for publicity that I see are:
Okay, now we're getting somewhere. I would like to add a top
reason
0. we don't really have a clue what LilyPond's priorities should be,
and where our
Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca writes:
Umm, have you missed my work on automating patches and fixing the
CG lately? I want to make sure that we treat *current* developers
fairly, before trying to recruit new ones. We've lost a *lot* of
potential effort from Trevor, James, Phil,
Hi,
I just took the material from
URL:http://nicolas.sceaux.free.fr/prelude/prelude.html and took a look
of how the current developer version may help in making things nicer to
a user. There is a lot in there (and I think it will make an appearance
in the next LilyPond report) but one thing
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 5:56 PM, Ian Hulin i...@hulin.org.uk wrote:
I pulled out and tested the examples in separate .ly file and the
format that fails is
#(define-markup-command (double-box layout props text) (markup?)
Draw a double box around text.
(interpret-markup layout props
On 11-12-14 04:51 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
Hi,
I just took the material from
URL:http://nicolas.sceaux.free.fr/prelude/prelude.html and took a look
of how the current developer version may help in making things nicer to
a user. There is a lot in there (and I think it will make an appearance
2011/12/14 Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca:
2. the old lilypond.org/web/ pages are still up (and probably
still in google's cache), various links point to those, which
gives the impression that our project died 3 years ago or
something.
Some of that work needs to be done by you, me,
Han-Wen Nienhuys hanw...@gmail.com writes:
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 5:56 PM, Ian Hulin i...@hulin.org.uk wrote:
I pulled out and tested the examples in separate .ly file and the
format that fails is
#(define-markup-command (double-box layout props text) (markup?)
Draw a double box around
Colin Campbell c...@shaw.ca writes:
On 11-12-14 04:51 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
made Lilypond complain. convert-ly was able to fix this and produced:
\midi {
\context {
\Score
tempoWholesPerMinute = #(ly:make-moment 80 4)
}
}
That is not particularly
LGTM. Could you send me the final patch so I can push to staging
immediately?
http://codereview.appspot.com/5477088/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
LGTM, but I'm not confident enough about this patch to circumvent our
review process, so please wait for it to go through a normal countdown.
If a tex guru (like David, Werner, or Reinhold) says it's good, I'm
willing to push it to staging directly.
http://codereview.appspot.com/5477087/
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 3:54 PM, gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
LGTM. Could you send me the final patch so I can push to staging
immediately?
http://codereview.appspot.com/5477088/
Sure, here it is. Please test make doc before pushing.
Regards,
Julien
From
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 04:04:07PM +0100, Julien Rioux wrote:
Sure, here it is. Please test make doc before pushing.
Nah, no need. I've pushed it to origin/staging, which undergoes a
complete build (binaries, regtests, doc) from scratch every 6
hours. If there's no problems, it's automatically
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 03:01:23PM +0100, Federico Bruni wrote:
Which kind of work is involved?
python scripts.
There's an issue about it on the tracker?
Probably not. I've pretty much abandoned adding Frog items,
really, since nobody pays attention to them.
I can find just this:
LGTM.
In particular, it's a good idea to call communicate() before checking
the returncode, because communicate ensures that the returncode is
set...
http://codereview.appspot.com/5477087/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
2011/12/14 Martin Tarenskeen m.tarensk...@zonnet.nl:
That does not seem the problem here. I still see these messages.
You can produce a minimal PDF from
{ c' } %END
and try launching it into evince. If it shows messages, send it to me.
--
Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain)
www.paconet.org ,
On Wed, 14 Dec 2011, Francisco Vila wrote:
2011/12/14 Martin Tarenskeen m.tarensk...@zonnet.nl:
That does not seem the problem here. I still see these messages.
You can produce a minimal PDF from
{ c' } %END
and try launching it into evince. If it shows messages, send it to me.
OK.
2011/12/14 Martin Tarenskeen m.tarensk...@zonnet.nl:
On Wed, 14 Dec 2011, Francisco Vila wrote:
2011/12/14 Martin Tarenskeen m.tarensk...@zonnet.nl:
That does not seem the problem here. I still see these messages.
You can produce a minimal PDF from
{ c' } %END
and try launching it
On 14/12/2011 10:21 AM, Graham Percival wrote:
It would be nice if you adding the above to that tracker issue.
Done.
--
Julien
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
27 matches
Mail list logo
