Re: Make \footnote work via \tweak (issue 6195098)

2012-05-21 Thread k-ohara5a5a
lgtm http://codereview.appspot.com/6195098/ ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Allow tweaks in Lyrics. (issue 6221046)

2012-05-21 Thread k-ohara5a5a
I'm having difficulty demonstrating that this works. \layout { \context { \Lyrics \consists Tweak_engraver }} \relative c' {c d e f } \addlyrics { ut \tweak #'color #'red re mi fa } ? http://codereview.appspot.com/6221046/ ___ lilypond-devel mailing

Re: Issue 2539: Redocument tweak (issue 6219047)

2012-05-21 Thread k-ohara5a5a
All seems clear. http://codereview.appspot.com/6219047/ ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Re: Allow tweaks in Lyrics. (issue 6221046)

2012-05-21 Thread dak
Reviewers: Keith, Message: On 2012/05/21 06:25:13, Keith wrote: I'm having difficulty demonstrating that this works. \layout { \context { \Lyrics \consists Tweak_engraver }} \relative c' {c d e f } \addlyrics { ut \tweak #'color #'red re mi fa } ? This \consists has the same effect as this

Re: Allow tweaks in Lyrics. (issue 6221046)

2012-05-21 Thread Keith OHara
On Mon, 21 May 2012 00:49:48 -0700, d...@gnu.org wrote: #red [...] instead of #'red Oh yes, that does it. ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Re: LoMus 2012

2012-05-21 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
Jan Nieuwenhuizen writes: Hope they get their act together eventually, since this is definitely nice promotion material. /me too; please update when there's a website with info available. I haven't seen anything besides https://twitter.com/#!/kyojindo/status/200967005380165633 And now

Re: contemporary accidental style

2012-05-21 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
Orm Finnendahl writes: \accidentalStyle neo-modern does not match your requirements? its close, but the immediate repetition is the problem. I encounter calls by musicians quite often if I don't explicitely restate the accidental (even if it's stated in the foreword). Question is: is

use guile to set specific extra-offset values if stem direction is up or down

2012-05-21 Thread padovani
Hello, I'm dealing with special noteheads I've designed and I need to move the stem and the flag differently if stem direction is up or down. I would like to create a guile lisp clause that sets the extra-offset value accordingly to the Stem position. I was trying this, but it does not

Re: use guile to set specific extra-offset values if stem direction is up or down

2012-05-21 Thread David Nalesnik
Hi José, On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 9:09 AM, padovani zepadovani.li...@gmail.comwrote: Hello, I'm dealing with special noteheads I've designed and I need to move the stem and the flag differently if stem direction is up or down. I would like to create a guile lisp clause that sets the

Re: Allow tweaks in Lyrics. (issue 6221046)

2012-05-21 Thread janek . lilypond
Cool! So for example http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=643 will work without having to do something in \layout block. I love changes like this! http://codereview.appspot.com/6221046/ ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org

contemporary accidental style

2012-05-21 Thread Orm Finnendahl
Hi, for years I'm sorely missing an accidental style for contemporary music, which I always use and which is quite common among contemporary composers in my experience. At the moment it requires quite some extra work in every score implementing the accidentals explicitely although its behaviour

Re: contemporary accidental style

2012-05-21 Thread Orm Finnendahl
Am Montag, den 21. Mai 2012 um 15:37:33 Uhr (+0200) schrieb David Kastrup: \accidentalStyle neo-modern does not match your requirements? its close, but the immediate repetition is the problem. I encounter calls by musicians quite often if I don't explicitely restate the accidental (even if

Re: contemporary accidental style

2012-05-21 Thread Orm Finnendahl
Am Montag, den 21. Mai 2012 um 15:58:14 Uhr (+0200) schrieb Jan Nieuwenhuizen: Question is: is neo-modern used and appreciated as it works right now and do we indeed need a contemporary style, or should neo-modern behave like Orm describes? I would opt for that. The only situation, I know of,

Re: contemporary accidental style

2012-05-21 Thread Orm Finnendahl
Am Montag, den 21. Mai 2012 um 16:18:16 Uhr (+0200) schrieb Orm Finnendahl: The example for neo-modern in the documentation actually is an excellent example for a situation where the musician has to ask about the second fis because it's not obvious if the accidental has been accidentally

Re: use guile to set specific extra-offset values if stem direction is up or down

2012-05-21 Thread padovani
Em 5/21/12 11:44 AM, David Nalesnik escreveu: \override Stem #'extra-offset = #(lambda (grob) (if (eqv? (ly:stem::calc-direction grob) UP) '(-0.02 . -0.25) '(0.02 . 0.25))) Hello David, thank you very much! Now I see that ly:stem::calc-direction only gives me the standard Stem

Re: Allow tweaks in Lyrics. (issue 6221046)

2012-05-21 Thread dak
On 2012/05/21 14:47:41, janek wrote: Cool! So for example http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=643 will work without having to do something in \layout block. Well, it is not exactly like the rest of the snippet is easy-peasy. I love changes like this! I have the strong suspicion that the

web: news about cancelled rc (issue 6223054)

2012-05-21 Thread dak
http://codereview.appspot.com/6223054/diff/1/Documentation/web/news-front.itexi File Documentation/web/news-front.itexi (right): http://codereview.appspot.com/6223054/diff/1/Documentation/web/news-front.itexi#newcode21 Documentation/web/news-front.itexi:21: @strong{Update (@emph{May 12,

Re: use guile to set specific extra-offset values if stem direction is up or down

2012-05-21 Thread David Nalesnik
Hi José, On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 10:20 AM, padovani zepadovani.li...@gmail.comwrote: Em 5/21/12 11:44 AM, David Nalesnik escreveu: \override Stem #'extra-offset = #(lambda (grob) (if (eqv? (ly:stem::calc-direction grob) UP) '(-0.02 . -0.25) '(0.02 . 0.25))) Hello David, thank

Re: use guile to set specific extra-offset values if stem direction is up or down

2012-05-21 Thread padovani
Oh, I'm sorry... I was reading everything in a hurry and didn't got the second part of your message. Thank you again! 2012/5/21 David Nalesnik david.nales...@gmail.com Hi José, On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 10:20 AM, padovani zepadovani.li...@gmail.comwrote: Em 5/21/12 11:44 AM, David Nalesnik

Re: use guile to set specific extra-offset values if stem direction is up or down

2012-05-21 Thread David Nalesnik
José, On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 11:02 AM, padovani zepadovani.li...@gmail.comwrote: Oh, I'm sorry... I was reading everything in a hurry and didn't got the second part of your message. No problem! I learned something new about ly:stem::calc-direction because of your email: didn't know that it

Re: use guile to set specific extra-offset values if stem direction is up or down

2012-05-21 Thread padovani
Hi again, so.. as the flags are now separate objects (2.15.38), I'm having problems to move them to the same place that I am moving the stems... if I just reproduce the lambda function I am using with Stems with flags, it does not work... \once \override Stem #'extra-offset =

Re: web: news about cancelled rc (issue 6223054)

2012-05-21 Thread graham
I hate to be a mao, but I believe I suggested a new news item? Think of each news item as a tweet or something like that. We have a new piece of news: the release candidate has been cancelled. In other news, Prague has really bumpy trams. (proof by induction with a sample size of 1)

Re: use guile to set specific extra-offset values if stem direction is up or down

2012-05-21 Thread David Nalesnik
Hi José, On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 12:25 PM, padovani zepadovani.li...@gmail.comwrote: Hi again, so.. as the flags are now separate objects (2.15.38), I'm having problems to move them to the same place that I am moving the stems... if I just reproduce the lambda function I am using with Stems

Re: use guile to set specific extra-offset values if stem direction is up or down

2012-05-21 Thread David Nalesnik
Hi again, It would be possible to offset both of them, but I think you might be better served by approaching the problem from a different angle. You can control the relative positioning of stem and note head through 'stem-attachment, which is a property of NoteHead. The flag will move

Re: use guile to set specific extra-offset values if stem direction is up or down

2012-05-21 Thread padovani
Em 5/21/12 3:03 PM, David Nalesnik escreveu: Sorry to take the Scheme fun out of it... (if this is in fact gives you what you want!) That's it! No need of the Scheme part of the Scheme fun! :) Thank you very much! -- http://zepadovani.info ___

Re: web: news about cancelled rc (issue 6223054)

2012-05-21 Thread janek . lilypond
Reviewers: dak, Graham Percival, Message: New version. On 2012/05/21 17:51:11, Graham Percival wrote: I hate to be a mao, but I believe I suggested a new news item? I thought that it was a non-obligatory suggestion. Think of each news item as a tweet or something like that. We have a new

Re: web: news about cancelled rc (issue 6223054)

2012-05-21 Thread dak
On 2012/05/21 18:22:45, janek wrote: New version. On 2012/05/21 17:51:11, Graham Percival wrote: I hate to be a mao, but I believe I suggested a new news item? I thought that it was a non-obligatory suggestion. Think of each news item as a tweet or something like that. We have a new

Re: web: news about cancelled rc (issue 6223054)

2012-05-21 Thread Graham Percival
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 06:37:59PM +, d...@gnu.org wrote: Five rounds of guesswork from several developers for a single sentence would not seem like the most efficient use of manpower for proceeding on this item. Agreed; just go ahead and push whatever you have right now. Regardless of

Re: web: news about cancelled rc (issue 6223054)

2012-05-21 Thread Janek Warchoł
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 10:43 PM, Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca wrote: On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 06:37:59PM +, d...@gnu.org wrote: Five rounds of guesswork from several developers for a single sentence would not seem like the most efficient use of manpower for proceeding on this