On 2012/10/03 05:10:27, janek wrote:
Could you modify the commit message so that it says why we need this
change?
It's not really a change but an API to something you had to do by hand
previously if you were working on .scm files providing user
customization in some manner (and there are a
On 2012/10/03 04:04:07, Keith wrote:
If you name it '\hide', I'll probably make an '\unHide' to revert the
stencil.
If you name it \no, I'll name the stencil-restoring function
'\restore'. You can
paint your shed whatever color you like.
\hide and \no are for different purposes (so far,
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 8:01 AM, d...@gnu.org wrote:
On 2012/10/03 05:10:27, janek wrote:
After reading the comments in your code i don't understant what's its
purpose.
Sounds like I should rather delete the comments...
oh, no! They are well-written and provide insight into your code.
It's
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 8:15 AM, d...@gnu.org wrote:
Given existing naming choices, \hide/\unHide is an obvious pairing.
\omit/unOmit would be logical but awkward, I'd lead towards
\omit/\remit.
Whoah, i didn't know that remit is a proper English word!
Sounds like Kermit to me... :P
(frankly,
On Tue, 02 Oct 2012 23:15:23 -0700, d...@gnu.org wrote:
\hide and \no are for different purposes
Oops, I forgot we were talking about the name 'no' for the function '\omit'.
The command to restore the stencil could be \unOmit or \restore.
I had to look up \remit in the dictionary, and
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 3:09 PM, James pkx1...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
Just an FYI, I was able to download install and run LP's test file
with no problems, on Windows 8.x (Enterprise Edition), I am not sure
if that is really significant vs Standard Edition but anyway.
Just thought I'd share
On 2012/10/03 06:20:10, janek wrote:
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 8:01 AM, mailto:d...@gnu.org wrote:
On 2012/10/03 05:10:27, janek wrote:
After reading the comments in your code i don't understant what's
its
purpose.
Sounds like I should rather delete the comments...
oh, no! They are
On 2012/10/03 06:27:56, Keith wrote:
On Tue, 02 Oct 2012 23:15:23 -0700, mailto:d...@gnu.org wrote:
\hide and \no are for different purposes
Oops, I forgot we were talking about the name 'no' for the function
'\omit'.
The command to restore the stencil could be \unOmit or \restore.
On Wed, 03 Oct 2012 01:25:30 -0700, d...@gnu.org wrote:
2. To restore. [Obs.]
[1913 Webster]
The archbishop was . . . remitted to his liberty.
--Hayward.
Don't believe everything you read.
Both 'remit' and
Keith OHara k-ohara5...@oco.net writes:
On Wed, 03 Oct 2012 01:25:30 -0700, d...@gnu.org wrote:
2. To restore. [Obs.]
[1913 Webster]
The archbishop was . . . remitted to his liberty.
--Hayward.
Don't
David Kastrup d...@gnu.org writes:
Well, remittere means to release, from its word constituents
back-send. omittere means to give up, disregard, from its word
constituents counter-send.
In any case, suitable naming of reversals look like doubling the number
of bikesheds, so I propose
2012/10/3 Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com:
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 1:06 AM, Martin Tarenskeen
m.tarensk...@zonnet.nl wrote:
I found this interesting document:
http://www.titanmusic.com/papers/public/meredith-dphil-final.pdf
Curious indeed!
And impressive as a thesis.
--
Francisco
2012/10/2 k-ohara5...@oco.net:
No is used in several senses in English. Here it serves as an article
(like German kein) but it also an adverb (nein). I do not think
Latin languages have a single-word negative article.
Spanish has «sin» =without , with no
«sin alcohol» =non-alcoholic
«sin
Francisco Vila paconet@gmail.com writes:
2012/10/2 k-ohara5...@oco.net:
No is used in several senses in English. Here it serves as an article
(like German kein) but it also an adverb (nein). I do not think
Latin languages have a single-word negative article.
Spanish has «sin»
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 12:45 PM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
incompatible with my reverse überbikeshed proposal since
\un\without would be quite garish
omg lol!
PS i think that sending a request for name suggestions on user might
be a good idea. Maybe they'll propose something else that
Reviewers: david.nalesnik, janek,
Message:
On 2012/10/03 05:04:11, janek wrote:
i've skimmed over the discussion in
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2858 and i'm
confused.
Do we want to change
\shape GrobName #'offsets
into
\shape #'offsets GrobName
or
\shape #'offsets
On 2012/10/02 23:39:05, david.nalesnik wrote:
LGTM
[...]
I wonder if it would be helpful to alter one or two of the following
applications of the function as override to the tweak form.
[...]
What about adding a demonstration here of the ability to modify curves
beginning
at the same
Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com writes:
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 12:45 PM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
incompatible with my reverse überbikeshed proposal since
\un\without would be quite garish
omg lol!
PS i think that sending a request for name suggestions on user might
be a
On 2012/10/03 13:57:25, dak wrote:
[...]
To those suggestions let me answer with the famous answer to the
question Mr
Gandhi, what do you think of Western civilization?, namely with I
would
consider it a good idea.
Oh, for just one zinger like that...
So the best I think I can do at
On 2012/10/03 15:08:30, david.nalesnik wrote:
On 2012/10/03 13:57:25, dak wrote:
[...]
To those suggestions let me answer with the famous answer to the
question Mr
Gandhi, what do you think of Western civilization?, namely with I
would
consider it a good idea.
Oh, for just one
On Sunday, September 30, 2012, Davod Kastrup wrote:
Hold your horses, this is another case too stupid for
documenting and walking people through. Give me two days, and then you
replace your define-public for the alists with define-session, and
that's it. The rest of the code stays as it is.
After testing the patch's functionality, only:
LGTM
http://codereview.appspot.com/6588056/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
On 2012/10/03 15:17:26, dak wrote:
[...]
and I am currently immersed in parser work to make the
Context.GrobName thing
fly.
Thank you very much for working on this! I am looking forward to being
able to fix the mess at the beginning of \alterBroken (and a general
offsetting function I
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 10:04 AM, d...@gnu.org wrote:
Uh, I guess we have a fundamental misunderstanding here. We already
_have_ sessions (you can call lilypond on several different .ly input
files and have them processed tentatively independently). We just don't
have any help for the
PS: LGTM :)
http://codereview.appspot.com/6588056/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 3:46 PM, d...@gnu.org wrote:
On 2012/10/03 05:04:11, janek wrote:
i've skimmed over the discussion in
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2858
and i'm confused. Do we want to change
\shape GrobName #'offsets
into
\shape #'offsets GrobName
or
\shape
david.nales...@gmail.com
OK, I think I'll wait till this patch and the Trevor's documentation
patch is through, and then I'll create a new issue for the regtests. I
may simply leave these two as they are, and add a short test along the
lines of, \shape works independently on curves
On 2012/10/03 16:38:45, janek wrote:
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 3:46 PM, mailto:d...@gnu.org wrote:
On 2012/10/03 05:04:11, janek wrote:
i've skimmed over the discussion in
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2858
and i'm confused. Do we want to change
\shape GrobName #'offsets
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 7:36 PM, d...@gnu.org wrote:
...but from this sentence i deduce that we're trying to do the second
thing, i.e. \shape will have one #'offsets argument and no argument
specifying grob name, which will be deduced from the music that
follows the command. Right?
Either
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 10:26 AM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
The reason I consider this an excessively bad
idea is that this would turn an articulation into something that
creates independent music events at an independent point of time.
That would mean that the rhythmic event iterator
Original Message
From: d...@gnu.org
Date: 03/10/2012 15:04
To: Janek Warchołjanek.lilyp...@gmail.com
Cc: k-ohara5...@oco.net, re...@codereview-hr.appspotmail.com,
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Subj: Re: Provide \hide and \no functions for transparent and void
glyphs (issue 6575048)
On 2012/10/03 19:32:15, pounderd_lineone.net wrote:
Original Message
From: mailto:d...@gnu.org
Call me an optimist, but I think we are good now.
Apologies if this ship has sailed, but has anyone considered \suppress
and \unsuppress?
The ship has not sailed, but retailoring the
32 matches
Mail list logo
