m...@mikesolomon.org m...@mikesolomon.org writes:
On 5 nov. 2012, at 06:51, m...@mikesolomon.org wrote:
1) rest-extent (common, Y_AXIS)
2) Rest::height
3) Rest::generic_extent_callback
4) Rest::brew_internal_stencil
5) Rest::glyph_name
6) Staff_symbol_referencer::get_position
7)
On 5 nov. 2012, at 09:19, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
m...@mikesolomon.org m...@mikesolomon.org writes:
On 5 nov. 2012, at 06:51, m...@mikesolomon.org wrote:
1) rest-extent (common, Y_AXIS)
2) Rest::height
3) Rest::generic_extent_callback
4) Rest::brew_internal_stencil
5)
m...@mikesolomon.org m...@mikesolomon.org writes:
On 5 nov. 2012, at 09:19, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
m...@mikesolomon.org m...@mikesolomon.org writes:
On 5 nov. 2012, at 06:51, m...@mikesolomon.org wrote:
1) rest-extent (common, Y_AXIS)
2) Rest::height
3)
On 5 nov. 2012, at 09:26, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
m...@mikesolomon.org m...@mikesolomon.org writes:
On 5 nov. 2012, at 09:19, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
m...@mikesolomon.org m...@mikesolomon.org writes:
On 5 nov. 2012, at 06:51, m...@mikesolomon.org wrote:
1)
m...@mikesolomon.org m...@mikesolomon.org writes:
On 5 nov. 2012, at 09:26, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
m...@mikesolomon.org m...@mikesolomon.org writes:
On 5 nov. 2012, at 09:19, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
m...@mikesolomon.org m...@mikesolomon.org writes:
On 5 nov. 2012,
On 5 nov. 2012, at 09:34, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
m...@mikesolomon.org m...@mikesolomon.org writes:
On 5 nov. 2012, at 09:26, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
m...@mikesolomon.org m...@mikesolomon.org writes:
On 5 nov. 2012, at 09:19, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
m...@mikesolomon.org m...@mikesolomon.org writes:
Do the different rest glyphs actually have different height? Would it
be possible to stipulate that they are not supposed to, and just let the
code for rest height in general return the height of the standard rest
glyph without bothering to
On 5 nov. 2012, at 09:45, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
m...@mikesolomon.org m...@mikesolomon.org writes:
Do the different rest glyphs actually have different height? Would it
be possible to stipulate that they are not supposed to, and just let the
code for rest height in general
- Original Message -
From: Jeremiah Benham jjben...@chicagoguitar.com
To: lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Sent: Monday, November 05, 2012 3:50 AM
Subject: Gub pango-1.26.0-darwin-cx-font.patch
Does anyone know what happened to this patch
pango-1.26.0-darwin-cx-font.patch. I
don't see it in
Do the different rest glyphs actually have different height? Would
it be possible to stipulate that they are not supposed to, and just
let the code for rest height in general return the height of the
standard rest glyph without bothering to check the on-staffiness?
I don't understand. A
On 5 nov. 2012, at 10:11, Werner LEMBERG w...@gnu.org wrote:
Do the different rest glyphs actually have different height? Would
it be possible to stipulate that they are not supposed to, and just
let the code for rest height in general return the height of the
standard rest glyph without
Am 03.11.2012 23:20, schrieb Janek WarchoĊ:
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 10:20 PM, Marc Hohl m...@hohlart.de wrote:
Am 02.11.2012 09:58, schrieb janek.lilyp...@gmail.com:
http://codereview.appspot.com/6813044/diff/6001/lily/clef-engraver.cc#newcode125
lily/clef-engraver.cc:125: if (ly_is_procedure
No, we're talking about the height of something like rests.1
compared to rests.1o in the Feta font.
OK.
The question is if these two glyphs have a different Y-extent
(rests.1 versus rests.1o).
From feta20.log, beautified:
whole rest 0 7.5 3.12507.5 0 0
I think it would be helpful to not-so-advanced English speakers if a
word more ordinary than gobble was used.
Janek
https://codereview.appspot.com/6819066/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
LGTM
Janek
https://codereview.appspot.com/6813079/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
On 2012/11/05 10:58:37, janek wrote:
I think it would be helpful to not-so-advanced English speakers if a
word more
ordinary than gobble was used.
I am not sure of that. gobble is actually pretty established in
programmer jargon:
From The Jargon File (version 4.4.7, 29 Dec 2003) [jargon]:
On 5 nov. 2012, at 11:15, Werner LEMBERG w...@gnu.org wrote:
No, we're talking about the height of something like rests.1
compared to rests.1o in the Feta font.
OK.
The question is if these two glyphs have a different Y-extent
(rests.1 versus rests.1o).
From feta20.log, beautified:
Very nice!
http://codereview.appspot.com/6812088/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
On 2012/11/05 22:40:36, lemzwerg wrote:
Very nice!
Can't review the code.
But from description:
GREAT
http://codereview.appspot.com/6812088/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Reviewers: lemzwerg, thomasmorley65,
Message:
On 2012/11/05 22:45:06, thomasmorley65 wrote:
On 2012/11/05 22:40:36, lemzwerg wrote:
Very nice!
Can't review the code.
But from description:
GREAT
It's actually more a fix of a shortcoming. Scheme functions should have
worked in most places
mike at mikesolomon.org mike at mikesolomon.org writes:
On 5 nov. 2012, at 11:15, Werner LEMBERG wl at gnu.org wrote:
So the answer is yes: The height (resp. the depth) is larger for
outside-staff glyphs.
So we officially have a circular dependency: in order to know the height
On 6 nov. 2012, at 04:51, Keith OHara k-ohara5...@oco.net wrote:
mike at mikesolomon.org mike at mikesolomon.org writes:
On 5 nov. 2012, at 11:15, Werner LEMBERG wl at gnu.org wrote:
So the answer is yes: The height (resp. the depth) is larger for
outside-staff glyphs.
So we
22 matches
Mail list logo
