Thomas Morley thomasmorle...@gmail.com writes:
Hi,
for some testings I tried to compile 2.17.27 from the tarball to be found at:
http://lilypond.org/website/development.html
on Ubuntu 10.04 64-bit
Without success. The terminal-output points me to
contributor.makeinfo.log
This file
On 30/09/13 08:28, David Kastrup wrote:
Thomas Morley thomasmorle...@gmail.com writes:
Hi,
for some testings I tried to compile 2.17.27 from the tarball to be found at:
http://lilypond.org/website/development.html
on Ubuntu 10.04 64-bit
Without success. The terminal-output points me to
2013/9/30 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org:
Thomas Morley thomasmorle...@gmail.com writes:
Hi,
for some testings I tried to compile 2.17.27 from the tarball to be found at:
http://lilypond.org/website/development.html
on Ubuntu 10.04 64-bit
Without success. The terminal-output points me to
lgtm
Cheers,
Julien
https://codereview.appspot.com/14077043/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Again, can we add a check if there is already a numbered backup around?
Make numbered backups for files that have numbered backups already.
Otherwise, make single backups. This is the default.
That would mean:
https://codereview.appspot.com/14040043/diff/6001/scripts/convert-ly.py
File
Thomas Morley thomasmorle...@gmail.com writes:
Looks like it. There were several recent changes in the build system,
actually even a change that was supposed to actually distribute
ly-grammar.txt. It's conceivable that Make sees the distributed
ly-grammar.txt and does not bother
2013/9/30 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org:
Thomas Morley thomasmorle...@gmail.com writes:
Looks like it. There were several recent changes in the build system,
actually even a change that was supposed to actually distribute
ly-grammar.txt. It's conceivable that Make sees the distributed
Thomas Morley thomasmorle...@gmail.com writes:
2013/9/30 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org:
Thomas Morley thomasmorle...@gmail.com writes:
Looks like it. There were several recent changes in the build system,
actually even a change that was supposed to actually distribute
ly-grammar.txt. It's
- Original Message -
From: Eluze elu...@gmail.com
To: Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com
Cc: David Kastrup d...@gnu.org; Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net;
LilyPond Development Team lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Sent: Sunday, September 29, 2013 11:26 PM
Subject: Re: Unverified issues?
David Kastrup d...@gnu.org writes:
Not necessary, that's quite sufficient. I should be able to reproduce
this, I guess. I have no problems _without_ a separate build
directory. Now trying with one.
Yes, it bombs. So we managed to distribute a setup that will refrain
from building
2013/9/30 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org:
David Kastrup d...@gnu.org writes:
Not necessary, that's quite sufficient. I should be able to reproduce
this, I guess. I have no problems _without_ a separate build
directory. Now trying with one.
Yes, it bombs. So we managed to distribute a setup
Thomas Morley thomasmorle...@gmail.com writes:
2013/9/30 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org:
David Kastrup d...@gnu.org writes:
Not necessary, that's quite sufficient. I should be able to reproduce
this, I guess. I have no problems _without_ a separate build
directory. Now trying with one.
- Original Message -
From: Thomas Morley thomasmorle...@gmail.com
To: David Kastrup d...@gnu.org
Cc: lilypond-devel lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Sent: Monday, September 30, 2013 12:15 PM
Subject: Re: Failed 'make' with 2.17.27 from tarball
2013/9/30 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org:
David
Phil Holmes-2 wrote
As Graham said, if you want to limit the time you spend, and spend it on
other bug squad duties, fine - leave loads unverified. If you've still
got
them next week, complain!
I'm not complaining, rather I'm pitying those who miss the chance to verify.
if one day we
Eluze elu...@gmail.com writes:
Phil Holmes-2 wrote
As Graham said, if you want to limit the time you spend, and spend it on
other bug squad duties, fine - leave loads unverified. If you've still
got
them next week, complain!
I'm not complaining, rather I'm pitying those who miss the
Julien - I'm not convinced that's a good idea. It would mean that, once
you'd turned numbering on, then you couldn't turn it off except by
deleting all the numbered files. I think it's better to let the user
select, based on the command line switches.
https://codereview.appspot.com/14040043/
On 2013/09/30 15:10:00, PhilEHolmes wrote:
Julien - I'm not convinced that's a good idea. It would mean that,
once you'd
turned numbering on, then you couldn't turn it off except by
deleting all the
numbered files. I think it's better to let the user select, based on
the
command line
- Original Message -
From: d...@gnu.org
To: philehol...@googlemail.com; julien.ri...@gmail.com;
ianhuli...@gmail.com
Cc: re...@codereview-hr.appspotmail.com; lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Sent: Monday, September 30, 2013 4:29 PM
Subject: Re: Add backup option to convert-ly (Issue 3572) (issue
Phil Holmes-2 wrote
On 2013/09/30 15:10:00, PhilEHolmes wrote:
Julien - I'm not convinced that's a good idea. It would mean that,
once you'd
turned numbering on, then you couldn't turn it off except by
deleting all the
numbered files. I think it's better to let the user select, based on
2013/9/30 Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net:
- Original Message - From: Thomas Morley
thomasmorle...@gmail.com
To: David Kastrup d...@gnu.org
Cc: lilypond-devel lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Sent: Monday, September 30, 2013 12:15 PM
Subject: Re: Failed 'make' with 2.17.27 from tarball
*Countdown – October 4th – 06:00 GMT* *
* *
* *
* *
* *
* *
* *
* *
* *
*
3582http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3582q=label%3APatch-pushsort=patchcolspec=ID%20Type%20Status%20Stars%20Owner%20Patch%20Summary%20Modified
Enhancement
David Kastrup push Patch: Let make-music
Reviewers: thomasmorley651,
Message:
On 2013/09/27 23:53:50, thomasmorley651 wrote:
LGTM
Question:
considering LSR-update, I recently added an earlier version of it to
the LSR
http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=887
Should I replace it with this one?
I think that depends on whether it
22 matches
Mail list logo
