Re: Web: revise navigation bars with CSS gradients (issue 193140043 by paulwmor...@gmail.com)

2015-01-14 Thread paulwmorris
The images are now included in this patch for lilypond-git and also in a pull-request to the lilypond-extra repo. (From the CG I got the impression that they only went in lilypond-extra, but on second glance it appears that they live in both places.) https://codereview.appspot.com/193140043/

Re: Reduce size of PDF files when inc. in *TeX docs (issue 194090043 by pkx1...@gmail.com)

2015-01-14 Thread lemzwerg
David's concerns are very specific to the Lilypond documentation, not covering the general case. Many programs simply can't process PS output at all, so the suggestion to collect PS data that gets reduced later on is not applicable. The only valid alternative is to make Lilypond natively

Web: revise navigation bars with CSS gradients (issue 193140043 by paulwmor...@gmail.com)

2015-01-14 Thread paulwmorris
Reviewers: , Message: Please review. A demo showing the desired result can be found here: http://clairnote.org / lilypond-web-demo2/ (just remove the two spaces in the url) Things should look the same in IE8 and IE9 as in other browsers. I will also need to add some images to the

Re: Reduce size of PDF files when inc. in *TeX docs (issue 194090043 by pkx1...@gmail.com)

2015-01-14 Thread Knut Petersen
On 14.01.2015 08:15, lemzw...@googlemail.com wrote: Hmm. I can't find in your description that `--bigpdfs' creates *big* output files that get later reduced to small one by running ghostscript again. https://codereview.appspot.com/194090043/ No? Have a look at the patch sent to

Re: Reduce size of PDF files when inc. in *TeX docs (issue 194090043 by pkx1...@gmail.com)

2015-01-14 Thread lemzwerg
Knut, *your* patch set has this, but James's version (in patch set 2) misses it. https://codereview.appspot.com/194090043/ ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Re: Reduce size of PDF files when inc. in *TeX docs (issue 194090043 by pkx1...@gmail.com)

2015-01-14 Thread pkx166h
On 2015/01/14 08:42:27, lemzwerg wrote: Knut, *your* patch set has this, but James's version (in patch set 2) misses it. Yes that's true. I thought this was a 'lost in translation' error. So we have: +Generate really big pdf files with as less as possible +optimization of font data.