Am 30.03.2015 um 09:31 schrieb Werner LEMBERG:
This would warrant a better mechanism to transplant spanners to a
different context: basically one would want a mechanism to listen
to slur endings in a different context than to slur starts.
Possibly optionally with a \once qualification.
I
Am 30.03.2015 um 07:58 schrieb David Kastrup:
Kevin Barry barr...@gmail.com writes:
For sure the voice context limitations are a pain, and if I knew how, I
would write a function for starting and finishing slurs without the need
for creating a hidden voice, but I don't even know if it is
This would warrant a better mechanism to transplant spanners to a
different context: basically one would want a mechanism to listen
to slur endings in a different context than to slur starts.
Possibly optionally with a \once qualification.
I think the idea of an analogy to \change Staff
Kevin Barry barr...@gmail.com writes:
For sure the voice context limitations are a pain, and if I knew how, I
would write a function for starting and finishing slurs without the need
for creating a hidden voice, but I don't even know if it is possible. In my
own head, I imagine that LilyPond
Am 30.03.2015 um 09:47 schrieb Urs Liska:
Am 30.03.2015 um 09:31 schrieb Werner LEMBERG:
This would warrant a better mechanism to transplant spanners to a
different context: basically one would want a mechanism to listen
to slur endings in a different context than to slur starts.
Possibly
Am 30.03.2015 um 10:05 schrieb Werner LEMBERG:
Thinking a little more about this: Wouldn't it even be possible to
implement this as a pair of comparably simple Scheme functions?
They would instantiate a hidden temporary Voice (of course using
\omit not \hide) and add the respective spanner to
in voiceA: c4
\connect #'Slur #'voiceB #'myanchor
d e f
in voiceB: e4 f g
\anchor #'myanchor
a
You mean instead of writing (, or \ or \startTrillSpan one
would write \connect and that would instantiate the grob denoted
Thinking a little more about this: Wouldn't it even be possible to
implement this as a pair of comparably simple Scheme functions?
They would instantiate a hidden temporary Voice (of course using
\omit not \hide) and add the respective spanner to that?
Sounds reasonable, but this is beyond
Any advice anyone?
Would you show me the whole ghostscript.log and
/home/gub/NewGub/gub/target/darwin-ppc/build/soobj/arch.h ?
Attached.
Thank you.
It seems 32 bit hosts cross compiling issue.
I've updated the branch.
On 2015/03/30 16:36:20, david.nalesnik wrote:
On 2015/03/29 20:33:33, pwm wrote:
Please review, thanks.
Could you provide an example where this would be useful?
Thanks,
David
OK, drat. Ignore that!! See Issue 3615, of course :)
https://codereview.appspot.com/219460043/
Werner LEMBERG w...@gnu.org writes:
This would warrant a better mechanism to transplant spanners to a
different context: basically one would want a mechanism to listen
to slur endings in a different context than to slur starts.
Possibly optionally with a \once qualification.
I think the
On 2015/03/29 20:33:33, pwm wrote:
Please review, thanks.
Could you provide an example where this would be useful?
Thanks,
David
https://codereview.appspot.com/219460043/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Thank you so much for bringing this up! This is a very annoying limitation
that should be fixed. I only wish I knew how to program enough to help.
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Reasons-for-cross-voice-limitations-tp173845p173898.html
Sent from the Dev
What about defining anchors? Having a slur ending in a different
voice makes the `(' ... `)' notation extremely hard to read (if it
works at all). Instead, I can imagine something like the following
to get a slur between voiceA and voiceB, starting on the second and
ending on the fourth
14 matches
Mail list logo
