On 2015/05/10 22:50:36, dak wrote:
The \revert version generated too many clashing notecolumns
warnings, which
is now need a \shiftXxx, and I thought it a bit safer to keep a
warning.
What's safer here? For old code where people did not bother heeding
the warning
anyway (possibly
This and the MMrest patch look sensible,
but it is a good idea to test them on some orchestral music from
mutopiaproject. I tried them on a piece I have and saw no output
differences.
https://codereview.appspot.com/238070043/diff/1/lily/part-combine-iterator.cc
File
On 2015/05/10 22:58:54, hanwenn wrote:
also handle length-fraction 1
PTAL
* I had a further look at the short stems, and should have fixed more
cases by disabling forbidden beam quanting in case of grace notes.
* magnifyMusic: can you show examples of what music at 50% scale should
look
Reviewers: ,
Description:
This could have been removed when the generation of mark events was
moved from C++ to Scheme in aae8f9ee8f62e8a57f4f60a60e639a040571f37b,
but it went unnoticed at that time.
Please review this at https://codereview.appspot.com/231560043/
Affected files (+0, -23
On 2015/05/10 21:00:26, Keith wrote:
On Sun, 10 May 2015 11:02:21 -0700, mailto:d...@gnu.org wrote:
It's not clear why you are now mixing in variants of conversion
rules
for issue 4372.
I noticed that my rule made the same \b mistake as yours, and they are
right
next to each other,
On Sun, 10 May 2015 11:02:21 -0700, d...@gnu.org wrote:
It's not clear why you are now mixing in variants of conversion rules
for issue 4372.
I noticed that my rule made the same \b mistake as yours, and they are right
next to each other, and I thought it was an easy fix, so I tried fixing
Reviewers: ,
https://codereview.appspot.com/236130043/diff/1/lily/part-combine-iterator.cc
File lily/part-combine-iterator.cc (left):
https://codereview.appspot.com/236130043/diff/1/lily/part-combine-iterator.cc#oldcode236
lily/part-combine-iterator.cc:236: kill_mmrest (CONTEXT_SHARED);
Here
On Sun, 10 May 2015 00:25:18 -0700, d...@gnu.org wrote:
On 2015/05/09 23:58:22, Keith wrote:
It is a bit of an inconvenience that
\relative skips over \transpose, and I suspect \relative has this
feature so that we do not get rising octaves in
\relative c \transpose c c' {c c c c}
We
https://codereview.appspot.com/190500043/diff/1/python/convertrules.py
File python/convertrules.py (right):
https://codereview.appspot.com/190500043/diff/1/python/convertrules.py#newcode3731
python/convertrules.py:3731: str = re.sub (r'\\shiftOff\b',
r'\\undo\\shiftOn', str)
I'm currently
On 10/05/15 08:33, David Kastrup wrote:
James Lowe: Doc: NR section 3.5.x MIDI file creation tidy up
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2877
There are still 5 patches at Patch-push right now, 4 of them being
documentation patches. In order not to require the others to rebase,
James Lowe p...@gnu.org writes:
Hello,
Here is the current patch countdown list. The next countdown will be on
May 12th.
You can always view the most current countdown list here:
2015-05-05 3:10 GMT+02:00 Paul Morris p...@paulwmorris.com:
Automatic formatting/indenting of C++ files currently doesn't work out of
the box” and there’s no easy way to manually get it to work. Artistic
Style 2.02 is required for LilyPond’s fixcc.py but LilyDev3 has 2.01, which
is the
On 10/05/15 08:33, David Kastrup wrote:
There are still 5 patches at Patch-push right now, 4 of them being
documentation patches. In order not to require the others to rebase,
I'll keep off today from applying the patch for issue 3229 (or rather,
running the script generating an up-to-date
On 2015/05/09 23:58:22, Keith wrote:
I had seen this selective application as a feature specific to
\relative. Most
music functions apply to all the music in their argument, but
\relative skips
over any \relative or \transpose. It is a bit of an inconvenience
that
\relative skips over
2015-05-04 20:41 GMT+02:00 Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu:
On 5/4/15 11:19 AM, Federico Bruni fedel...@gmail.com wrote:
So I'd rather put a script to download the repository when the user logs
in
for the first time.
What do you think?
Isn't that the way it works right now? If not, it
It's not clear why you are now mixing in variants of conversion rules
for issue 4372. There already is a more thorough conversion rule for
issue 4372 in review and I don't see any comment of yours on it. While
there may have been some overlap in effort, it does not make sense to
mix that issue
Hello lilypond team,
as a student of Information Technology I want to help making lilypond
even better. I have some experience with C++ and Make, the other
languages of the project are a new experience for me. But I have no fear
to learn some new. Furthermore using git and unix tools like
Simon Nagl simonn...@aim.com writes:
Hello lilypond team,
as a student of Information Technology I want to help making lilypond
even better. I have some experience with C++ and Make, the other
languages of the project are a new experience for me. But I have no
fear to learn some new.
James Lowe p...@gnu.org writes:
On 10/05/15 08:33, David Kastrup wrote:
There are still 5 patches at Patch-push right now, 4 of them being
documentation patches. In order not to require the others to rebase,
I'll keep off today from applying the patch for issue 3229 (or rather,
running the
On 2015/05/10 15:44:17, Keith wrote:
On Sun, 10 May 2015 05:06:24 -0700, mailto:d...@gnu.org wrote:
In addition, the following commit
commit a1d73a332fc4d1cb99bace19a5ec2c35262429e7
Author: Keith OHara mailto:k-ohara5...@oco.net
Date: Tue Dec 30 23:30:27 2014 -0800
Update by hand
On Sun, 10 May 2015 05:06:24 -0700, d...@gnu.org wrote:
In addition, the following commit
commit a1d73a332fc4d1cb99bace19a5ec2c35262429e7
Author: Keith OHara k-ohara5...@oco.net
Date: Tue Dec 30 23:30:27 2014 -0800
Update by hand instead of convert-ly
The documentation already
LGTM.
https://codereview.appspot.com/233300043/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
22 matches
Mail list logo
