Re: Delete new LSR-snippet?

2016-12-24 0:53 GMT+01:00 Knut Petersen : > Hi Trevor! >> >> I seem to remember a post or maybe an LSR entry for placing >> divisi arrows at the end of a staff. Maybe this could be >> adapted to achieve the same effect more reliably? >> >> Found it - LSR 650. It

Re: Delete new LSR-snippet?

2016-12-23 18:55 GMT+01:00 Simon Albrecht : > On 23.12.2016 12:42, Thomas Morley wrote: >> >> with >> http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?u=1=1049 >> a new snippet arrived. >> Though, it only demonstrates how to use 'extra-offset, imho. > > > And very poorly – how the staff

Re: Delete new LSR-snippet?

On 2016-12-23 20:48, Trevor Daniels wrote: I seem to remember a post or maybe an LSR entry for placing divisi arrows at the end of a staff. Maybe this could be adapted to achieve the same effect more reliably? Found it - LSR 650. It modifies the barline stencil. IIRC: How come that a bunch

Re: \arrow markup command

2016-12-23 23:06 GMT+01:00 Simon Albrecht : > Hello again, > > I created a better preview image and on the way noticed that a small > adjustment is necessary, so that the line doesn’t obstruct the finer tip of > the filled arrow head. > > Best, Simon Hi Simon, For now

Re: [PATCH [uploaded to Rietveld]] Automatic lyric extenders

Dear all, I just uploaded Knut's patch (with minor reformatting, to obey the 80-char-per-line limit) to Rietveld; see https://codereview.appspot.com/313240043 The corresponding issue can be found at https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/5018/ I missed the warnings hidden by

Re: Delete new LSR-snippet?

Hi Trevor! I seem to remember a post or maybe an LSR entry for placing divisi arrows at the end of a staff. Maybe this could be adapted to achieve the same effect more reliably? Found it - LSR 650. It modifies the barline stencil. Something like the following code could be a base:

Re: \arrow markup command

Hello again, I created a better preview image and on the way noticed that a small adjustment is necessary, so that the line doesn’t obstruct the finer tip of the filled arrow head. Best, Simon arrow.pdf Description: Adobe PDF document \version "2.19.53" \header { tagline = ##f } \paper

Re: [PATCH [uploaded to Rietveld]] Automatic lyric extenders

On 23.12.2016 22:36, Alexander Kobel wrote: The corresponding issue can be found at https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/5018/ …which I took the liberty to merge with . Thanks for the work and happy holidays as well! Best,

\arrow markup command

Hello, I have just been annoyed by the fact that it takes four commands (\combine, \arrow-head, \override, and \draw-line) to draw an acceptable arrow-head (\override is to match the thickness of the line to the Feta glyph), so I proceeded to code an \arrow markup command simplifying the use.

Re: [PATCH [uploaded to Rietveld]] Automatic lyric extenders

Dear all, I just uploaded Knut's patch (with minor reformatting, to obey the 80-char-per-line limit) to Rietveld; see https://codereview.appspot.com/313240043 The corresponding issue can be found at https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/5018/ Thanks again Knut for this great

Automatic LyricExtenders (issue 313240043 by perpeduumimmob...@gmail.com)

Reviewers: , Message: For the sake of completeness: deserves an entry in changes.tely (TBD when the syntax discussion is over that I expect to start some time soon...) Description: Automatic LyricExtenders As written and communicated by Knut Peterson. For reference, see the threads

Re: Delete new LSR-snippet?

Thomas Morley wrote Friday, December 23, 2016 11:42 AM > with > http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?u=1=1049 > a new snippet arrived. > Though, it only demonstrates how to use 'extra-offset, imho. > I tend to delete it, otoh I don't want to scare away a possible new > contributor... > > Opinions?

Re: Delete new LSR-snippet?

On 23.12.2016 12:42, Thomas Morley wrote: with http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?u=1=1049 a new snippet arrived. Though, it only demonstrates how to use 'extra-offset, imho. And very poorly – how the staff lines resurface after the text script… This is definitely not showcase-able and I agree

Re: LilyDev 5.0 released

On 12/23/2016 12:00 AM, Federico Bruni wrote: Il giorno gio 22 dic 2016 alle 18:48, Paul ha scritto: I gave it a try. Installation seemed to go fine, but then on booting it up I get past the GRUB screen and then it goes to a black unresponsive screen at "loading

Re: LilyDev 5.0 released

On 12/22/2016 01:37 PM, James wrote: I also tried to install LilyDev 5.0 last week - I use Ubuntu 16.0.4 with the latest 64 bit vBox 5.1.x test build (112223 w Ext pack 112433). Hi James, Thanks for the info and tips. I may try your approach with a newer version of Virtual Box when I get a

GUB bug in package dependencies determination?

Hello developers, another topic in my quest for building a minimal dockerized GUB. A first look on the following error message makes me suspect that GUB’s package dependency management is somewhat broken. The error was obtained by trying to run a make lilypond in a succesfully bootstrapped GUB

Re: Delete new LSR-snippet?

- Original Message - From: "Thomas Morley" To: "lilypond-devel" Sent: Friday, December 23, 2016 11:42 AM Subject: Delete new LSR-snippet? Hi all, with http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?u=1=1049 a new snippet arrived. Though, it only

Delete new LSR-snippet?

Hi all, with http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?u=1=1049 a new snippet arrived. Though, it only demonstrates how to use 'extra-offset, imho. I tend to delete it, otoh I don't want to scare away a possible new contributor... Opinions? Cheers, Harm ___