Re: Issue 3830: Document \offset command (issue 319150043 by david.nales...@gmail.com)

On 2017/01/24 23:32:51, t.daniels_treda.co.uk wrote: mailto:david.nales...@gmail.com wrote Tuesday, January 24, 2017 10:57 PM > Question: > > How do I get a backslash in @subsubsubheading{} ? > > The literal symbol doesn't show up, and @backslashchar{} displays > @backslashchar{} From

Re: Issue 3830: Document \offset command (issue 319150043 bydavid.nales...@gmail.com)

david.nales...@gmail.com wrote Tuesday, January 24, 2017 10:57 PM > Question: > > How do I get a backslash in @subsubsubheading{} ? > > The literal symbol doesn't show up, and @backslashchar{} displays > @backslashchar{} >From memory it's @bs{}. Trevor

Re: Issue 3830: Document \offset command (issue 319150043 by david.nales...@gmail.com)

Question: How do I get a backslash in @subsubsubheading{} ? The literal symbol doesn't show up, and @backslashchar{} displays @backslashchar{} https://codereview.appspot.com/319150043/ ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org

Re: Issue 3830: Document \offset command (issue 319150043 by david.nales...@gmail.com)

I've posted an extensive rewrite which hopefully addresses all the concerns. I think the result is a lot more user-friendly. Note that I did not change the argument-name "offsets". My preference would be to use "displacements" here, because I think it is exactly expressive of its use. The

Re: [PATCH] no-outline-stencil backend property

Knut Petersen writes: > Am 24.01.2017 um 14:49 schrieb David Kastrup: >> What a steaming heap of something. So your code would likely have worked in LilyPond 2.16. I think it would make sense to create a new type of stencil expression explicitly intended

Re: [PATCH] no-outline-stencil backend property

Knut Petersen writes: > Am 24.01.2017 um 14:49 schrieb David Kastrup: >> What a steaming heap of something. So your code would likely have worked in LilyPond 2.16. I think it would make sense to create a new type of stencil expression explicitly intended

Re: [PATCH] no-outline-stencil backend property

Knut Petersen writes: > Am 24.01.2017 um 14:49 schrieb David Kastrup: >> What a steaming heap of something. So your code would likely have worked in LilyPond 2.16. I think it would make sense to create a new type of stencil expression explicitly intended

Re: [PATCH] no-outline-stencil backend property

Am 24.01.2017 um 14:49 schrieb David Kastrup: What a steaming heap of something. So your code would likely have worked in LilyPond 2.16. I think it would make sense to create a new type of stencil expression explicitly intended to bypass outlining. Probably by just containing _two_ stencils:

Re: Issue 3830: Document \offset command (issue 319150043 by david.nales...@gmail.com)

Thanks so such for the detailed review! Will post a patch update in the near future. https://codereview.appspot.com/319150043/diff/1/Documentation/notation/changing-defaults.itely File Documentation/notation/changing-defaults.itely (right):

Re: Issue 3830: Document \offset command (issue 319150043 by david.nales...@gmail.com)

David, Thanks for doing this - I know how hard it is to add a large entry in the NR (and that is coming from a Native English speaker). My comments below are, I hope, constructive. Anything I can do to help you, let me know.

Re: [PATCH] no-outline-stencil backend property

Knut Petersen writes: > Hi David! > >> What a steaming heap of something. So your code would likely have >> worked in LilyPond 2.16. I think it would make sense to create a new >> type of stencil expression explicitly intended to bypass >> outlining. Probably by just

Re: PATCHES - Countdown for Tuesday January 24

On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 7:38 AM, James wrote: > Hello David, > > On Tue, 24 Jan 2017 07:05:24 -0600 > David Nalesnik wrote: > >> > >> >> Would you add >> >> 3830 Documentation for \offset is required >> https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/3830/

Re: PATCHES - Countdown for Tuesday January 24

James, On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 4:43 AM, James wrote: > Hello, > > Here is the current patch countdown list. The next countdown will be on > January 27 > > > A quick synopsis of all patches currently in the review process can be > found here: > >

Re: PATCHES - Countdown for Tuesday January 24

Hello David, On Tue, 24 Jan 2017 07:05:24 -0600 David Nalesnik wrote: > > > > Would you add > > 3830 Documentation for \offset is required > https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/3830/ > https://codereview.appspot.com/319150043/ For anything to appear

[PATCH] no-outline-stencil backend property

Hi David! What a steaming heap of something. So your code would likely have worked in LilyPond 2.16. I think it would make sense to create a new type of stencil expression explicitly intended to bypass outlining. Probably by just containing _two_ stencils: one for typesetting, one for outlining.

Re: Issue 3830: Document \offset command (issue 319150043 by david.nales...@gmail.com)

https://codereview.appspot.com/319150043/diff/1/Documentation/notation/changing-defaults.itely File Documentation/notation/changing-defaults.itely (right): https://codereview.appspot.com/319150043/diff/1/Documentation/notation/changing-defaults.itely#newcode2522

PATCHES - Countdown for Tuesday January 24

Hello, Here is the current patch countdown list. The next countdown will be on January 27 A quick synopsis of all patches currently in the review process can be found here: http://philholmes.net/lilypond/allura/ Push: No patches to push at this time Countdown: 5037 web: GSoC page:

Re: GSoC project ideas

Am 23.01.2017 um 23:11 schrieb Simon Albrecht: > On 23.01.2017 22:47, Urs Liska wrote: >> So while it's perfectly possible to put OLL projects on the list and to >> apply for them (or others not listed there) in case of doubt projects >> working on LilyPond itself might be the preference of the