Hello,
Here is the current patch countdown list. The next countdown will be on
September 29th
A quick synopsis of all patches currently in the review process can be
found here:
http://philholmes.net/lilypond/allura/
Push: No patches to push at this time
Countdown:
5203 Don't let event
> Somehow, concisely say "get-rid-of-anything-extra" versus
> "keep-everything-that-comes?"
>
> --min-fonts and --max-fonts
> --compress-fonts and --expand-fonts
I would rather prefer --compress-fonts and --no-compress-fonts. This
is easier to remember (and rather common in GNU packages).
> --
On 2017/09/26 22:19:27, dak wrote:
> If you know a better name for the option I'd happy to start sed.
--final-output ? --flatten-fonts ? Not sure about the inversions of
those,
however.
Somehow, concisely say "get-rid-of-anything-extra" versus
"keep-everything-that-comes?"
--min-fonts a
On 2017/09/26 20:26:36, knupero wrote:
> Regarding the naming of the option, I'd prefer to have something
> oriented around the actual use characteristics rather than the
> internal details.
>
> Does that sound like something you can agree with?
Yes. That sounds reasonable.
If you know a b
> Remember: We used the hardcoded name "Emmentaler" at various places
> for --bigpdfs, and --use-encodings still needs and uses that portion
> of the old code.
Before remembering something, I need to know it in the first place.
Sounds like something we should get rid off in the long run.
Ye
"James" writes:
> Hello,
>
> Sourceforge appears to be down at the moment so I am unable to process
> all the trackers that are in progress this evening. I am therefore
> having to postpone the countdown until tomorrow.
Ah, that explains why Slashdot is down also. Probably all of, uh,
BizX? is
Hello,
Sourceforge appears to be down at the moment so I am unable to process all the
trackers that are in progress this evening. I am therefore having to postpone
the countdown until tomorrow.
Regards
James
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-d
At 18:05 26/09/2017 +0200, Knut Petersen wrote:
Just to be absolutely certain; the lack of PDFDontUseFontObjectNum is no
longer a showstopper for you ?
We do not need PDFDontUseFontObjectNum any longer. It's removal is not a
showstopper.
Thanks for the confirmation!
We've run across a r
Am 26.09.2017 um 14:13 schrieb Ken Sharp:
At 11:24 25/09/2017 +0200, Knut Petersen wrote:
Thanks to the ghostscript community for your great tool and your patience!
Just to be absolutely certain; the lack of PDFDontUseFontObjectNum is no longer
a showstopper for you ?
We do not need PDFDo
At 11:24 25/09/2017 +0200, Knut Petersen wrote:
Thanks to the ghostscript community for your great tool and your patience!
Just to be absolutely certain; the lack of PDFDontUseFontObjectNum is no
longer a showstopper for you ?
We're planning to do a second release candidate 'real soon now'
On 2017/09/25 22:17:41, knupero wrote:
On 2017/09/25 17:33:47, dak wrote:
> I see. Still using -dgs-never-embed-fonts _without_
> --use-encodings seems like the most unusual combination, so I'd
> prefer if one had to explicitly switch encodings _off_ rather than
> _on_.
So you are absolute
11 matches
Mail list logo