Re: gub targets + binary packages

On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 11:39 AM Jonas Hahnfeld wrote: > Just to double-check: You built on Linux, copied the binaries to macOS and > were able to execute them? Because as far as I understand, releases are not > built natively right now... > > All correct. GUB on Ubuntu on VirtualBox on Windows

Re: Frescobaldi on MacOS 10.15 with MacPorts

> On 21 Oct 2019, at 01:24, Davide Liessi wrote: > > Il giorno sab 19 ott 2019 alle ore 20:31 Hans Åberg > ha scritto: >> Instead I experienced further corruption, and decided to reinstall the whole >> of MacPorts from scratch. I do not want to try it again. > > 10.15 is new, so it is

Re: gub targets + binary packages

Am Montag, den 21.10.2019, 11:02 -0500 schrieb Karlin High: > On 10/18/2019 4:00 AM, Jonas Hahnfeld via lilypond-devel wrote: > > I managed to get Python 3.7.4 integrated into gub. > > Would be great if somebody could checkthat the binaries actually work on > > macOS 10.14. > > I cloned

Re: gub targets + binary packages

On 10/18/2019 4:00 AM, Jonas Hahnfeld via lilypond-devel wrote: I managed to get Python 3.7.4 integrated into gub. Would be great if somebody could check that the binaries actually work on macOS 10.14. I cloned and checked out the python3 branch. GUB

Re: Fix underline-markup to make multiple calls have nice output (issue 559150043 by thomasmorle...@gmail.com)

On 2019/10/21 15:36:04, thomasmorley651 wrote: Then we would have the following properties ((thickness 1) (offset 2) (underline-shift 0) (underline-offset 2)) A user-override for underline-shift would disturb things, though. Maybe some words in the doc-string about it? Having both offset

Re: Fix underline-markup to make multiple calls have nice output (issue 559150043 by thomasmorle...@gmail.com)

On 2019/10/21 11:20:03, dak wrote: > > The combination > > \markup \underline \overtie huh > > would likely be madly confusing if the \underline managed to shift the \overtie > around. So maybe \underline should retain the previous meaning and setting of offset and add an _additional_

PATCHES - Countdown for October 21st

Hello, Here is the current patch countdown list. The next countdown will be on October 23rd. A quick synopsis of all patches currently in the review process can be found here: http://philholmes.net/lilypond/allura/ Push: 5576 make output-distance less verbose by default - Dan Eble

Re: Fix underline-markup to make multiple calls have nice output (issue 559150043 by thomasmorle...@gmail.com)

On 2019/10/21 11:24:02, thomasmorley651 wrote: On 2019/10/21 11:13:17, dak wrote: > The combination > > \markup \underline \overtie huh > > would likely be madly confusing if the \underline managed to shift the \overtie > around. One could work around with \markup \underline

Re: Fix underline-markup to make multiple calls have nice output (issue 559150043 by thomasmorle...@gmail.com)

On 2019/10/21 10:31:32, dak wrote: On 2019/10/21 09:52:41, thomasmorley651 wrote: > Does this one need a convert-rule? > > If so, I'd need some help. My python-skill is more or less zero. I've just taken some look. It would appear that the only other markup commands using the "offset"

Re: Fix underline-markup to make multiple calls have nice output (issue 559150043 by thomasmorle...@gmail.com)

On 2019/10/21 11:13:17, dak wrote: On 2019/10/21 11:02:12, thomasmorley651 wrote: > On 2019/10/21 10:31:32, dak wrote: > > On 2019/10/21 09:52:41, thomasmorley651 wrote: > > > Does this one need a convert-rule? > > > > > > If so, I'd need some help. My python-skill is more or less zero. > > > >

Re: Fix underline-markup to make multiple calls have nice output (issue 559150043 by thomasmorle...@gmail.com)

On 2019/10/21 11:02:12, thomasmorley651 wrote: On 2019/10/21 10:31:32, dak wrote: > On 2019/10/21 09:52:41, thomasmorley651 wrote: > > Does this one need a convert-rule? > > > > If so, I'd need some help. My python-skill is more or less zero. > > I've just taken some look. It would appear that

Re: Fix underline-markup to make multiple calls have nice output (issue 559150043 by thomasmorle...@gmail.com)

On 2019/10/21 11:13:17, dak wrote: The combination \markup \underline \overtie huh would likely be madly confusing if the \underline managed to shift the \overtie around. One could work around with \markup \underline \underline \underline \underline \underline \override

Re: Fix underline-markup to make multiple calls have nice output (issue 559150043 by thomasmorle...@gmail.com)

On 2019/10/21 09:52:41, thomasmorley651 wrote: Does this one need a convert-rule? If so, I'd need some help. My python-skill is more or less zero. I've just taken some look. It would appear that the only other markup commands using the "offset" property are the \tie/\overtie\undertie

Fix underline-markup to make multiple calls have nice output (issue 559150043 by thomasmorle...@gmail.com)

Reviewers: , Message: Does this one need a convert-rule? If so, I'd need some help. My python-skill is more or less zero. Description: Fix underline-markup to make multiple calls have nice output Amend regtest markup-commands.ly with an example for it. Please review this at