On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 12:22:59PM +0100, Julien Rioux wrote:
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 5:12 AM, gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
Awesome work as always. There's some unintended (and bad) changes to
GNUmakefile.in.
That's a mistake when I uploaded (pointing to the wrong commit in
git-cl
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 11:11:21AM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca writes:
But hey, it's my job to teach them
at whatever level they're at, right?
Nope. It is your job to teach them from the level they should have left
high school with. After two
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 06:36:43AM -0600, Colin Campbell wrote:
On 12-03-23 12:28 AM, Graham Percival wrote:
We need a *secretary*. We need a *paper pusher*. We need a trained
monkey.
I could take it on, Graham, especially if the countdown process gets
automated. I read -user, -devel
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 08:06:23PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
Engineering student numbers have dropped significantly
at my former university, and it is to be expected that standards were
adjusted downwards in order to get enough students back (we have state
education almost exclusively, but
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 10:31:20PM +0100, Marek Klein wrote:
I've succeeded in building lilypond. :)
test-patches.py says: No new patches to test.
What are my next steps?
I've just set issue 2216 to Patch-new, so try running it again.
- Graham
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 10:42:54PM +0100, Marek Klein wrote:
Exception: Command 'git fetch' returned non-zero exit status 128
error: insufficient permission for adding an object to repository
database .git/objects
fatal: failed to write object
fatal: unpack-objects failed
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 08:18:26AM +1100, Peter Chubb wrote:
Hi Graham,
Graham We don't really have a frog meister, so nobody is taking
Graham responsibility for pushing
I have another patch waiting, that depends on the first.
Is there supposed to be a procedure for casual
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 11:40:43PM +, James wrote:
Graham We don't really have a frog meister, so nobody is taking
Graham responsibility for pushing
I have another patch waiting, that depends on the first.
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
I've offered to
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 04:41:34PM -0400, Julien Rioux wrote:
Thanks for having a look. By the way, it looks like
http://lilypond.org/website just replicates http://lilypong.org at a
deeper level -- any reason why this is so? Is that from before the
switch to the new website?
Correct, but it
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 10:48:57PM +0100, Marek Klein wrote:
Exception: Failed runner: ./autogen.sh --noconfigure
See the log file log-None-autogen.sh.txt
Well, what's in the log file log-None-autgen.sh.txt ? It's in the
build directory.
This whole infrastructure assumes that you
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 01:06:42AM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
I have the fear that the desire to get to this state might prompt some
regression fixes that have not necessarily gotten all the diligence that
would have been desirable.
This is a valid fear in general, but I haven't seen it
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 01:24:54PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
I find that in my patchy runs, I get directories
/tmp/lilypond-autobuild (my configured build directory)
and a hierarchy of build directories under it, possibly one per tested
patch (?).
nope, nothing to do with Patchy.
ls
We have a new mailing list for automatic messages. No human
emails are allowed; only whitelisted email addresses can send to
the list.
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-auto
Scripts whose output should be sent to this list include:
- patchy staging-merge (both success and failure
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 12:11:46AM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
So instead of surprising volunteers by giving them more information than
expected we give them less information than expected?
Bug squad members shouldn't be reading tracker messages anyway.
On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 12:15:20PM -, Phil Holmes wrote:
# A general rule: do not interrupt a build. It seems to use file locks
# as a way of controlling multi-cpu builds, and it can get confused
# if interrupted. I've had to start from scratch in this case. :-(
It's possible to
On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 07:38:29PM +, Keith OHara wrote:
David Kastrup dak at gnu.org writes:
Prior Emails?
Here :
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2011-07/msg00686.html
The resulting patch solved the problem of thick barlines, but did not
make it into version
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 05:53:57PM +, Carl Sorensen wrote:
On 3/16/12 11:44 AM, no-re...@google-melange.appspotmail.com
no-re...@google-melange.appspotmail.com wrote:
Unfortunately, we were unable to accept your organization's application
at this time.
If we are serious about doing this
I think it's high time for somebody else to run the new-patches
test. For this task, David is ridiculously overqualified, but his
laptop is pretty underqualified. That combination makes him
almost the worst person to run this task.
I'm hoping that this won't end up with James doing it; IMO even
PM, Graham Percival
gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
It might be good to wait a week to see what projects were
accepted,
http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/accepted_orgs/google/gsoc2012 ?
Somebody on another venue pointed out that it'll take a few hours
or days for the complete list to show
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 09:52:52PM +0100, Marek Klein wrote:
I can do it, I think (almost every day).
Great! Here's the link to get started:
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.15/Documentation/contributor/patchy
... although apparently that doesn't include a link to the actual
code. huh.
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 05:28:21PM -0400, Julien Rioux wrote:
On 16/03/2012 4:55 PM, Graham Percival wrote:
... although apparently that doesn't include a link to the actual
code. huh.
https://github.com/gperciva/lilypond-extra
No?
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.15/Documentation/contributor
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 10:16:10PM +0100, Janek Warchoł wrote:
I'll contact them asking to add us to their umbrella. Any suggestions
before i do this?
Prepare a blurb in the same format as their existing ones.
Shall i talk with them about the number of
students' slots (i guess we could ask
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 08:59:53AM -, Phil Holmes wrote:
Please see http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2407.
Great!
Can I please now quieten this warning using the explicit command
line switch --quiet?
huh? I'm sorry, but I think this points to a different lesson.
If we
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 03:06:22PM +, Graham Percival wrote:
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 08:59:53AM -, Phil Holmes wrote:
Can I please now quieten this warning using the explicit command
line switch --quiet?
huh? I'm sorry, but I think this points to a different lesson.
If we
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 01:39:11PM +, James wrote:
I think this needs to be reviewed just like any other patch should be,
why *would* we just push this?
Well, I think this one is simple enough to push directly.
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 08:16:17PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
commit 65c8ce914c62117fb61a21237f7dcf80ebb0cc6e
Make Score an initial Timing alias to allow for context mods
But then I am pretty certain that I actually ran make info on that one
to make reasonably sure it did not cause
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 07:45:39PM +, Graham Percival wrote:
info will check if you can generate the internals reference, i.e.
with scm/documentation-generate.scm. It won't call the lilypond
binary to produce any output at all.
No wait, I'm completely wrong. Sorry, I was thinking of make
Has anybody else seen a huge slow-down in building fonts? They
used to whiz by on my screen in a minute or so, but now it takes
about 10 minutes, and more to the point, it involves a massive
amount of disk activity. My core2quad desktop couldn't play an
mp3 file while building fonts with -j3 !
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 08:00:44PM -, Phil Holmes wrote:
- Original Message - From: Graham Percival
gra...@percival-music.ca
To: lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2012 7:59 PM
Subject: font regression build regression
Has anybody else seen a huge slow-down
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 10:27:52PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
And the MacOSX /bin/sh is the first shell I heard of that does not grok
echo -n.
...
If this may not be true, `printf' is in general safer and easier
to use than `echo' and `echo -n'.
This matches the open group
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 10:25:40PM +0100, Janek Warchoł wrote:
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 4:39 PM, Graham Percival
gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
Well, I think this one is simple enough to push directly.
Shall i do this?
And shall i not ask next time? ;)
If you are certain
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 02:49:29PM +1100, Peter Chubb wrote:
graham == graham gra...@percival-music.ca writes:
graham ok. In the future, when updating a patch, please point git-cl
graham at your existing issue (which was orginally 2404, but I'm
graham going to close 2404 and 2405 and
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 06:31:35PM -, Phil Holmes wrote:
- Original Message - From: julien.ri...@gmail.com
To: philehol...@googlemail.com; d...@gnu.org;
gra...@percival-music.ca; m...@philholmes.net
Cc: lilypond-devel@gnu.org; re...@codereview-hr.appspotmail.com
Sent: Monday,
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 03:10:41PM -, Phil Holmes wrote:
I think I have GUB running properly. I gave up trying to get it
working on 64-bit Ubuntu and created a new VirtualBox VM with
lilydev 1.1 as the OS.
Are you sure you mean lilydev 1.1 and not 1.2 ?
I have documented what I did for
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 04:19:24PM -, Phil Holmes wrote:
- Original Message - From: Graham Percival
gra...@percival-music.ca
To: Phil Holmes em...@philholmes.net
Cc: Devel lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Sent: Sunday, March 11, 2012 3:30 PM
Subject: Re: GUB success?
On Sun, Mar 11
LilyPond 2.15.30 is out; this is not a actual release candidate
but it can be considered as an unofficial candidate. All users
are invited to experiment with this version. New features since
2.14.2 are listed in the “Changes” manual on the website section
about Development.
lilypad will not work on osx 10.4 x86. It works on 10.4 ppc. I
do not consider bugs in osx-10.4 x86 to be release-critical; they
should be filed as normal type-build bugs. Somebody may want to
update the download page accordingly to avoid giving users the
wrong impression.
If somebody can make
On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 07:51:20PM +, Graham Percival wrote:
If somebody can make 10.4-x86 work, then it would be great to
officially support it again in the future. However, I think
that's too far away; delaying 2.16.0 for that doesn't make sense.
oops, I should delay all emails by 5
On Thu, Mar 08, 2012 at 05:24:51PM -, Phil Holmes wrote:
One thought. Some issues are best verified by checking lily output
- http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2246 for
example. Can we break a normal rule and check these against a newly
made binary? What we'd then be
On Wed, Mar 07, 2012 at 01:58:24PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
David Kastrup d...@gnu.org writes:
I can reproduce the problems when merging. It would appear that the
history of the translation branch got messed up at some point of time in
a manner that git can't recognize how to merge
On Wed, Mar 07, 2012 at 05:27:08PM -, Phil Holmes wrote:
As an improvement to patchy, wouldn't it be better for patchy to
test for a stop-patchy branch and abort if it finds one? Then all
that would be necessary to suspend the cron job would be to create a
branch with that name.
No; if
On Tue, Mar 06, 2012 at 01:22:42PM +0100, Janek Warchoł wrote:
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 11:17 PM, Graham Percival
gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
What happens about the tax form? I'm not signing any legal
document unless I'm certain it's the right thing. Is GNU
submitting that foreign
On Tue, Mar 06, 2012 at 04:01:44PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
Oh, by the way, Google's first hit for LilyPond download is
URL:http://lilypond.org/web/install/ which states When we have
whetted your appetite for LilyPond, then this is the right page.
Unfortunately, it is the wrong page since
On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 11:00:38AM +, James wrote:
Francisco
15 * * * * cd /home/james/lilypond-git python
/home/james/patchy/lilypond-patchy-staging.py
cron ignores your ~/.profile, ~/.bashrc, etc. Remember that shell
script I sent you a few month ago, along with my sample config
On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 07:45:35AM -, Phil Holmes wrote:
- Original Message - From: Graham Percival
gra...@percival-music.ca
To: Colin Hall colingh...@gmail.com
Let's drop Lilypad. It's getting in the way of regular releases.
Disagree.
Disagree. I'm with Colin. I've
On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 11:08:38AM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
As far as I understand, in spite of the initial activities of core
LilyPond developers, LilyPad is basically an external application that
we just wrap and don't actively codevelop (meaning that its overlap with
actual LilyPond
On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 04:16:11PM -, Phil Holmes wrote:
I'd like to push Reinhold's patch at
http://codereview.appspot.com/5674101/ but don't want to usurp
ownership. If I look at the patch on Reitveld, there's no
identification information. Is there any way to get this from
Reitveld to
On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 10:48:28PM +0100, Janek Warchoł wrote:
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 7:22 PM, Rodrigo Rodrigues da Silva
pita...@members.fsf.org wrote:
On Sat, 2012-03-03 at 23:56 +, Graham Percival wrote:
Hmm. My instinct would be to try it separately, anyway. We're
not the size
On Sun, Mar 04, 2012 at 08:10:59AM +, James wrote:
Anyway, I'm back at home this evening and will have a few more test
runs (with cron just to make sure I can leave it unattended) and then
by Monday I should be running 'lilypond-patchy-staging.py' as often as
people want me to. Any
On Sun, Mar 04, 2012 at 11:36:37AM -, Phil Holmes wrote:
Patch attached.
Thanks, pushed.
- Graham
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
On Sun, Mar 04, 2012 at 11:52:04AM -, Phil Holmes wrote:
This GUB patch should take the shortcut with the non-existent target
out of the windows build. Untested, because I can't, but I believe
it's correct.
I'm not entirely comfortable pushing patches that are untested
unless they're
On Sun, Mar 04, 2012 at 02:57:44PM -, Phil Holmes wrote:
- Original Message - From: Graham Percival
gra...@percival-music.ca
Please send a new patch with the subject Remove mingw shortcut to
examples, or Remove windows shortcut to examples, or something
along those lines
On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 12:36:13AM +, Colin Hall wrote:
Development of code specific to the MacOS X platforms, especially
Lilypad, is slow.
Yes-ish. We don't have a lot of osx-specific code, and unless
there's plans to make lilypad-osx fancier, we don't really need
any more code.
We
On Sat, Mar 03, 2012 at 09:56:33AM +0100, Janek Warchoł wrote:
On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 9:16 AM, James pkx1...@gmail.com wrote:
I still have some fundamental questions about the scripts.
Have you read
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.15/Documentation/contributor/patchy
?
GrahamDavid, when i said
On Sat, Mar 03, 2012 at 03:08:27PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
This removes all mention of users being able to add comments to bug
reports.
It's still mentioned under step 4, so I didn't complain during the
countdown. But after glancing at the final output,
http://lilypond.org/bug-reports.html
At some point in the build, it dies with this:
.git-release-unstable/out-www/online-root/ .
Instrumenting for Google Analytics
Documentation/web/index.html
Documentation/changes/index.html
Documentation/notation/index.html
Documentation/internals/index.html
Traceback (most recent call last):
On Sat, Mar 03, 2012 at 09:08:46PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca writes:
File test-lily/rsync-lily-doc.py, line 225, in module
Interesting in so far as the last doc builds in the course of patchy
were successful.
Those are the lilypond make doc
On Sat, Mar 03, 2012 at 09:15:46PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
@item If you're not the right user on the webserver, remove the
@code{t} from the rsync command in:
Have you tried doing the release as the right user on the webserver?
That's only relevant for the upload. Despite the rsync in
On Sat, Mar 03, 2012 at 09:34:54PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
Well, the question is why its behavior would have bothered changing.
Sure it is not a problem of user identity, or a parallel build, or user
quota?
* commit dd6232b71b9d1b1cfd6938608e6583fe54f93004
| Author: Phil Holmes
We now have zero Critical issues, so I'd like to have another
release canddiate. Unfortunately, there is still at least one
issue to verify in the list for 2.15.31, so I will not make a
release.
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/list?can=7
- Graham
On Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 11:19:58PM +0100, Valentin Villenave wrote:
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 1:31 PM, Graham Percival
gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
We need to make more space on lilypond.org. I've deleted
binaries, documentation, and regtests from everything other than
the first and last
On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 12:07:16AM -0800, Joe Neeman wrote:
This patch allows me to build ghostscript in gub on Ubuntu 11.10. The
problem is that ghostscript only looks for sys/types.h in /usr/include,
whereas Ubuntu 11.10 has it in /usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu.
Thanks, pushed. I've checked
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 09:47:46AM +0100, Federico Bruni wrote:
- browser support?
http://www.codedread.com/svg-support.php
In 2007 Graham was against using SVG, because of limmited browser support:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2007-04/msg00087.html
5 years later,
We need to make more space on lilypond.org. I've deleted
binaries, documentation, and regtests from everything other than
the first and last release of a stable series.
I'm going to do the same for the source tarballs, but I'll wait a
few days in case anybody urgently wants to save them. This
At the moment, we can't have text and rehearsal marks at the same
place, i.e.
\relative c' {
c1
\mark \default
\mark play violently
d
}
This can be faked by using a \tempo mark:
\relative c' {
c1
\mark \default
\tempo play violently
d
}
But if you want to display an actual
On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 10:01:21PM +, Carl Sorensen wrote:
Looking at the failed command, it appears to me that gcc_tooldir is wrong.
There is no directory /usr/powerpc-apple-darwin7
I just tried a build from scratch on ubuntu 11.10 64-bit, and I
have a possibly-related build failure:
On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 01:30:53PM -, Phil Holmes wrote:
Not sure if that's a good thing or not - it could be argued that you
can go back and check them if they've not been deleted.
I don't think they should be deleted as part of doc-clean or
clean. If somebody wants to add a log-clean,
On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 03:57:55PM +, julien.ri...@gmail.com wrote:
This is good, I now get the error message right away when running
configure. No problem with the patch after installing the required
package. Do lilydev and gub already include the fontforge python
package?
No, and adding
On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 04:50:21PM +, Carl Sorensen wrote:
On 2/25/12 9:23 AM, Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
No, and adding this to GUB will be particularly challenging. I'm
afraid that this will probably postpone the patch indefinitely.
:(
Can't we add that package
On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 04:58:59PM +, philehol...@googlemail.com wrote:
Pushes the output from making midi .ly files and ly-examples to logfiles
- slightly more controversial - uses the run-and-check shell script to
do this.
What's supposed to be controversial here? Seems like an
On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 09:51:31PM +, janek.lilyp...@gmail.com wrote:
I decided not to use @rglos and @rinternals (because from what i
understand it would print the name of the section i'm referring to) but
use @rglosnamed and @rinternalsnamed instead.
I discourage (but not forbid) the use
On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 02:06:46PM -0800, Joe Neeman wrote:
On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 8:23 AM, Graham Percival
[1]gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
No, and adding this to GUB will be particularly challenging. I'm
afraid that this will probably postpone the patch indefinitely
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 11:47:59AM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
It does not really make _any_ sense then to continue messing with
master, I think.
thanks, pushed.
- Graham
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 04:52:00PM -0800, Janek Warchol wrote:
It would be good indeed if you have a mentor; unfortunately, i don't think
you'll find one here, on frogs. It's hard to find a mentor in general...
I'm not much Lily-knowledgeable, so i don't think i would be a good mentor
for
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 04:55:06PM -0500, Julien Rioux wrote:
On 15/02/2012 9:14 AM, Julien Rioux wrote:
I modified Graham's Rietveld patchy to fix two issues: [...]
This new version should be tested before I send a formal pull request.
If anyone is interested I have gone through the
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 11:24:22PM +, janek.lilyp...@gmail.com wrote:
Could you help me with links to music glossary and internals? Julien
wrote that they are wrong, and i don't know how they should be done (and
i'm really busy so if you can save me 15 minutes of searching i'd be
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 12:46:28AM +0100, Francisco Vila wrote:
2012/2/17 Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca:
- nobody touches the release/unstable branch, than translators,
who may merge with that if they want to and don't break
anything.
oops, that should have read other than
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 09:57:34AM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca writes:
If so, there's no problem. But I would doubt that they have such a
policy -- and getting the FSF investigated due to tax evasion or
something would suck. I like to be extra
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 08:49:21PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
Uh, Graham? Just fixed another regression discovered by an LSR failure
and pushed to staging. It would appear that this needs to be in 2.16
according to our policies.
Well, there's already 2 Critical issues, and I think that 2335
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 09:40:26PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
I just bungled staging with bad Texinfo in a regtest and saw that you
merged into it right after that, presumably because of a release. I can
either replace the merge (it will no longer have the same commit id) or
throw it out
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 10:39:28PM +0100, Janek Warchoł wrote:
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 1:19 AM, Han-Wen Nienhuys hanw...@gmail.com wrote:
I think FSF/GNU project can and has acted as organization in the past.
I guess so. GSoC FAQ says this:
5. What tax related documentation is required
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 09:57:54PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca writes:
oh, I see. That was actually a clean-up from 2.15.30, because the
tag got lost because release/unstable didn't merge into master
properly. (why? no clue; I just followed
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 11:53:52PM +0100, Janek Warchoł wrote:
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 11:23 PM, Graham Percival
gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
Maybe wait 12 hours in case somebody else wants to do it, then try
to contact the FSF yourself. Applications start tomorrow and only
run
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 03:09:44PM +, Colin Hall wrote:
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 02:54:39PM -, Phil Holmes wrote:
Check if the issue falls into any previous category given on the
relevant checklists in Bug Squad checklists. If in doubt, add a new
issue for a report.
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 03:53:35PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu writes:
I guess that's possible, but the gcc in GUB is 4.1.1, which I don't think
had that code generation bug.
It didn't, but don't you need to bootstrap? I obviously don't know GUB.
GUB
I've released release candidate 3. There always seems to be
confusion about this, so let's go over what this means:
- activity on master goes on as normal.
- nobody touches the release/unstable branch, than translators,
who may merge with that if they want to and don't break
anything.
The
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 06:33:29PM +, Carl Sorensen wrote:
That said, I've never been able to build GUB on anything other
than ubuntu 10.04. Are you using 11.10 ? I've definitely failed
on that OS.
Ubuntu 10.04, as implemented in lilydev. I've done it both as a VM and as
a separate
GUB cannot build master:
lilypond-book.py (GNU LilyPond) 2.15.30
cd ./out-test dblatex suffix-lyxml.xml
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /usr/bin/dblatex, line 10, in ?
from contrib.debian.errorhandler import DebianHandler
File
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 10:24:46AM +0100, Francisco Vila wrote:
2012/2/15 Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca:
Look, the make dist broken is just a subject line that I typed.
Trust me, I really want to learn how to prevent dist problems caused
by translations.
Great! Download GUB
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 01:51:03PM +0100, Janek Warchoł wrote:
Why is your organization applying to participate in Google Summer of
Code 2012? What do you hope to gain by participating?
Most importantly: more contributors
surely: new code
also: spreading news about LilyPond,
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 02:39:58PM +0100, Julien Rioux wrote:
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 12:14 PM, Graham Percival
gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
The correct bugfix may be simply to update the version of dblatex
in GUB, but that is rarely as simple as it sounds.
Either fix your dblatex
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 03:07:53PM +0100, Julien Rioux wrote:
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 2:54 PM, Graham Percival
gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
GUB is an (almost)-complete separate beast. It uses the base OS
to build gcc/make/etc, but thereafter it compiles (almost)
everything using only
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 12:46:38PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
test-patchy has the following to say:
oops, sorry, I replied to your other message before noticing this
one.
[116]fatal error: cannot find font: `emmentaler-11'
I believe that Mike has fixed this in his massive dev/skylines
file from VC not distributed:
lilypond-2.15.30/Documentation/cs/included/GNUmakefile
file from VC not distributed:
lilypond-2.15.30/Documentation/hu/included/GNUmakefile
file from VC not distributed:
lilypond-2.15.30/Documentation/zh/included/GNUmakefile
- Graham
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 07:03:36PM -, Phil Holmes wrote:
Well - that's clearly down to my adding those files to .git. What
does make dist do?
It, or rather make distcheck, makes sure that the source tarball
matches the actual source. But I don't know exactly what GUB
calls, so don't
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 07:14:53PM -, Phil Holmes wrote:
So - presumably make dist creates the tarball, and as part of it, it
calls make distcheck to compare the tarball with the source tree.
Does that sound sensible?
In normal unix packages, 'make dist' createa a tarball, then 'make
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 03:14:38PM +0100, Julien Rioux wrote:
Could someone familiar with patchy please locally replace their
compile_lilypond_test.py file with the attached one and test it
against the patches that are currently lining up for testing?
To avoid leaving you hanging:
- I am
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 07:21:24PM +, Carl Sorensen wrote:
1) gub needs to automatically set the lilypond version string from the
lilypad source tarball to the current lilypond version, regardless of
whether the lilypad source tarball is 0.4 or 0.6.1
I do not consider this
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 08:08:42PM -, Phil Holmes wrote:
- Original Message - From: Graham Percival
gra...@percival-music.ca
(I recommend running Patchy as a separate user just in case stuff
blows up)
I kind of thought you were suggesting not experimenting with
patchy-test
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 08:36:31PM -, Phil Holmes wrote:
- Original Message - From: Graham Percival
gra...@percival-music.ca
It's
challenging to decide when I should nag people (or clarify the
situation) or not.
I thought you always erred on the side of nagging people
601 - 700 of 5586 matches
Mail list logo
