Re: nice stockhausen excerpt

2010-02-22 Thread Johannes Schindelin
Hi, On Mon, 22 Feb 2010, Hans Aberg wrote: On 22 Feb 2010, at 11:50, Graham Percival wrote: I repeat: there is no way that our use of Stockhausen would qualify as fair dealing under Canadian copyright law. I cannot speak to copyright law in Germany, Sweden, or other jurisdictions. So

Re: top posting

2010-01-29 Thread Johannes Schindelin
Hi, On Fri, 29 Jan 2010, Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool) wrote: [do not know who said that, Bertalan removed that information] I think you don't understand what top posting means: It means that you quote the whole message (and all messages that it quoted) and simply add your reply at the

Re: show git SHA1 in output of `lilypond --version'

2009-12-16 Thread Johannes Schindelin
Hi, On Wed, 16 Dec 2009, Werner LEMBERG wrote: It would make life a bit easier for testers who are directly compiling from git if the SHA1 number (perhaps the first eight digits only) could be shown in the output of lilypond --version Any chance to add this? The common way is to do

Re: Editors invoked by git rebase -i

2009-12-02 Thread Johannes Schindelin
Hi, On Wed, 2 Dec 2009, Trevor Daniels wrote: I used git rebase -i to combine several commits into one for the first time recently. This was in ubuntu. It threw me for a while because the first editor it brought up was nano (to edit the list of commits) and then vi (to edit the commit

Re: developers developers developers

2009-11-12 Thread Johannes Schindelin
Hi, On Thu, 12 Nov 2009, Werner LEMBERG wrote: I'm talking about developer tools. For example, some months ago I got the advice to use grep to browse LilyPond source code. BTW, have you found something better? Eclipse is quite good at finding macro definitions etc., but it relies

Re: Git question

2009-09-09 Thread Johannes Schindelin
Hi, On Wed, 9 Sep 2009, Michael Käppler wrote: Let's assume I've checked out a fresh master/origin and did some commits on top of it. How can I concatenate this commits in one to create only one patch? The easiest way I can think of: if your latest, say, 5 commits should be squashed into

Re: lilycontrib.tcl, was Re: the r in git pull -r

2009-08-12 Thread Johannes Schindelin
Hi, On Wed, 12 Aug 2009, Maximilian Albert wrote: 2009/8/12 Johannes Schindelin johannes.schinde...@gmx.de: Fixed and pushed. Yep, verified. Many thanks once again! I think this can be very useful for new contributors. I hope so. Maybe you tell me the most common operations, and I'll

Re: lilycontrib.tcl, was Re: the r in git pull -r

2009-08-11 Thread Johannes Schindelin
Hi, On Tue, 11 Aug 2009, Maximilian Albert wrote: 2009/8/11 Johannes Schindelin johannes.schinde...@gmx.de:  It actually only gives you a Clone/Update button that makes sure that a local clone (hardcoded to $HOME/lilypond) is up-to-date, but at least it has a progress bar, and I

Re: lilycontrib.tcl, was Re: the r in git pull -r

2009-08-11 Thread Johannes Schindelin
Hi, On Tue, 11 Aug 2009, Maximilian Albert wrote: 2009/8/11 Johannes Schindelin johannes.schinde...@gmx.de: It actually worked here, twice. But you have this wonderful output field in the GUI, what does it have to say? I imagine that it gave you some error message or some

Re: update from the git battlefield

2009-08-11 Thread Johannes Schindelin
Hi, On Tue, 11 Aug 2009, Trevor Daniels wrote: Mark Polesky wrote Tuesday, August 11, 2009 12:25 AM I'm git-weary but still alive. Johannes spent *hours* debugging my problem, and eventually traced it to an undiscovered bug in gitk that only affects Microsoft Windows... Nice to

Re: lilycontrib.tcl, was Re: the r in git pull -r

2009-08-11 Thread Johannes Schindelin
Hi, On Tue, 11 Aug 2009, Jonathan Kulp wrote: On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 4:12 AM, Maximilian Albert maximilian.alb...@googlemail.com wrote: P.S.: It would be nice to let the script print a short message when it's finished so that the user know when to stop waiting. ;-) I had the same

Re: lilycontrib.tcl, was Re: the r in git pull -r

2009-08-11 Thread Johannes Schindelin
Hi, On Tue, 11 Aug 2009, Jonathan Kulp wrote: On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 6:45 AM, Johannes Schindelin johannes.schinde...@gmx.de wrote: So it doesn't give an error, just a warning. But AFAIR I have seen this warning on my non-GUI-based checkouts, too, even though everything

Re: lilycontrib.tcl, was Re: the r in git pull -r

2009-08-11 Thread Johannes Schindelin
Hi, On Tue, 11 Aug 2009, Jonathan Kulp wrote: On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 7:00 AM, Jonathan Kulp jonlancek...@gmail.comwrote: On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 6:45 AM, Johannes Schindelin johannes.schinde...@gmx.de wrote: So it doesn't give an error, just a warning. But AFAIR I have seen

Re: lilycontrib.tcl, was Re: the r in git pull -r

2009-08-11 Thread Johannes Schindelin
Hi, On Tue, 11 Aug 2009, Maximilian Albert wrote: I pushed a new version to git://repo.or.cz/lilypond/dscho.git.  You can download it directly here: http://repo.or.cz/w/lilypond/dscho.git?a=blob_plain;f=lilycontrib.tcl;hb=lilycontrib Cool, works like a charm now. Thanks a lot! I

Re: lilycontrib.tcl, was Re: the r in git pull -r

2009-08-11 Thread Johannes Schindelin
Hi, On Wed, 12 Aug 2009, Maximilian Albert wrote: 2009/8/11 Johannes Schindelin johannes.schinde...@gmx.de: I actually had to change the --work-tree things, since it is utter garbage.  I _know_ why I was opposed to its inclusion. [..] I added two shorter notices, and I also set

Re: update from the git battlefield

2009-08-11 Thread Johannes Schindelin
Hi, On Tue, 11 Aug 2009, Mark Polesky wrote: Trevor Daniels wrote: Does that mean shallow clones are inadvisable on Windows? I'll let Johannes confirm, but I think that shallow clones should be fine on Windows now. I got the sense that he killed the beast last night. It was actually

Re: the r in git pull -r

2009-08-10 Thread Johannes Schindelin
Hi, On Mon, 10 Aug 2009, Graham Percival wrote: On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 08:45:22AM +0100, Trevor Daniels wrote: Graham Percival wrote Monday, August 10, 2009 12:48 AM I maoing hate git. Git is fine; the complexity comes from the baroque structures in LilyPond. Let's be thankful

Re: the r in git pull -r

2009-08-10 Thread Johannes Schindelin
Hi, On Mon, 10 Aug 2009, Graham Percival wrote: On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 10:34:11AM +0200, Johannes Schindelin wrote: On Mon, 10 Aug 2009, Graham Percival wrote: We've lost 50% of potential contributors to the website because of git. Fair enough. Maybe it is time to suggest

lilycontrib.tcl, was Re: the r in git pull -r

2009-08-10 Thread Johannes Schindelin
Hi, On Mon, 10 Aug 2009, Johannes Schindelin wrote: On Mon, 10 Aug 2009, Graham Percival wrote: On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 10:34:11AM +0200, Johannes Schindelin wrote: On Mon, 10 Aug 2009, Graham Percival wrote: We've lost 50% of potential contributors to the website because

Re: getting source with git

2009-08-09 Thread Johannes Schindelin
Hi, On Sat, 8 Aug 2009, Patrick McCarty wrote: On Sat, Aug 08, 2009 at 01:59:50AM -0700, Graham Percival wrote: A few people talked about browsing the history, which surprised me. Whenever I want to look at history, I use the web git interface. But evidently other people don't

Re: How can I use git to help me merge a patch with the new directory structure

2009-07-27 Thread Johannes Schindelin
Hi, On Sun, 26 Jul 2009, Carl Sorensen wrote: On 7/26/09 11:35 AM, Johannes Schindelin johannes.schinde...@gmx.de wrote: On Sat, 25 Jul 2009, Carl Sorensen wrote: As you're aware, I've been working on a patch for autobeaming. It affects c++, scheme, and documentation files

Re: How can I use git to help me merge a patch with the new directory structure

2009-07-26 Thread Johannes Schindelin
Hi, On Sat, 25 Jul 2009, Carl Sorensen wrote: As you're aware, I've been working on a patch for autobeaming. It affects c++, scheme, and documentation files. Now I want to apply the patch to master. But the problem is that all of the documentation files have moved to

[ANNOUNCE] Git User's Survey 2009 (fwd)

2009-07-15 Thread Johannes Schindelin
Hi, as every year, there is a user's survey about Git; Hopefully as every year, useful and fascinating ideas will crop up! Ciao, Johannes -- Forwarded message -- Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2009 09:22:32 +0200 From: Jakub Narebski jna...@gmail.com To: g...@vger.kernel.org Subject:

Re: git push origin requires extra setup in 1.6.3

2009-07-09 Thread Johannes Schindelin
Hi, On Thu, 9 Jul 2009, Patrick McCarty wrote: On Thu, Jul 09, 2009 at 01:49:12AM -0700, Graham Percival wrote: Thanks for adding the info about .git/config [push] default = matching to the CG, Patrick! Bloody git developers and their bloody inconsistent commands / setup

Re: development on windows

2009-06-12 Thread Johannes Schindelin
Hi, On Thu, 11 Jun 2009, Jonathan Kulp wrote: Graham Percival wrote: On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 05:50:15PM -0500, Jonathan Kulp wrote: Success! Ok here's what I have: lilybuntu.iso (717 MB) And what's that when you gzip or bzip2 it? This could potentially cut the network

Re: development on windows

2009-06-11 Thread Johannes Schindelin
Hi, On Thu, 11 Jun 2009, Graham Percival wrote: On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 05:50:15PM -0500, Jonathan Kulp wrote: Success! Ok here's what I have: lilybuntu.iso (717 MB) And what's that when you gzip or bzip2 it? This could potentially cut the network transfer by more than half.

Re: git on Windows (was: Re: git not fetching from origin...)

2009-06-08 Thread Johannes Schindelin
Hi, On Mon, 8 Jun 2009, Trevor Daniels wrote: Johannes Schindelin wrote Tuesday, May 26, 2009 2:10 PM On Tue, 26 May 2009, Carl D. Sorensen wrote: When I make my own patches, they're Unix line endings. Trevor, could you do a quick search for the fixes you've pushed

Re: Savannah is up again

2009-06-02 Thread Johannes Schindelin
Hi, On Tue, 2 Jun 2009, John Mandereau wrote: Graham Percival a écrit : According to http://savannah.gnu.org/forum/forum.php?forum_id=5828 a push is precisely what we should do -- since git is a decentralized source control system, that will upload all the missing history.

Re: git on Windows (was: Re: git not fetching from origin...)

2009-05-26 Thread Johannes Schindelin
Hi, On Tue, 26 May 2009, Trevor Daniels wrote: Johannes Schindelin wrote Tuesday, May 26, 2009 8:53 AM On Tue, 26 May 2009, Trevor Daniels wrote: Johannes Schindelin wrote Tuesday, May 26, 2009 12:05 AM On Mon, 25 May 2009, Mark Polesky wrote: 1.5.2 Installing git

Re: git on Windows (was: Re: git not fetching from origin...)

2009-05-26 Thread Johannes Schindelin
Hi, On Tue, 26 May 2009, Mark Polesky wrote: When I installed git, I selected Unix style line endings. Now every time I git commit -a or even git diff HEAD I get this warning for *each* modified file: warning: CRLF will be replaced by LF in filename. Please do not top-post. At least

Re: git on Windows (was: Re: git not fetching from origin...)

2009-05-26 Thread Johannes Schindelin
Hi, On Tue, 26 May 2009, Carl D. Sorensen wrote: When I make my own patches, they're Unix line endings. Trevor, could you do a quick search for the fixes you've pushed, and identify the patches that caused the problem? You can let Git search for you: $ git log -S$(printf \r) If

Re: git on Windows (was: Re: git not fetching from origin...)

2009-05-26 Thread Johannes Schindelin
Hi, On Tue, 26 May 2009, Mark Polesky wrote: Johannes Schindelin wrote: I think you could replace the input with true in you /etc/gitconfig's autocrlf setting in the [core] section. This should take care of the issue. It does, thanks. Great! Ciao, Dscho

Re: git not fetching from origin...

2009-05-25 Thread Johannes Schindelin
Hi, On Sun, 24 May 2009, Mark Polesky wrote: And how do I exit the EDIT_COMMITMSG window? I've included an image showing the window. If I click on the X button, the whole git bash shell closes along with it. That can't be right. It's starting vi. Okay, this one I figured out. It says

Re: git not fetching from origin...

2009-05-25 Thread Johannes Schindelin
Hi, On Sun, 24 May 2009, Patrick McCarty wrote: On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 10:33:51PM -0600, Carl D. Sorensen wrote: On 5/24/09 8:40 PM, Mark Polesky markpole...@yahoo.com wrote: I think the instructions in the CG just aren't clear enough. Is anyone out there happily making git

Re: git on Windows (was: Re: git not fetching from origin...)

2009-05-25 Thread Johannes Schindelin
Hi, On Mon, 25 May 2009, Mark Polesky wrote: 1.5.2 Installing git 0) Full installer or portable application? This is my fault; PortableGit is a recent addition. I'd recommend the installer (but not the full installer available from msysgit.googlecode.com). 1) Describe Windows

Re: Re: PDF Problem

2009-05-11 Thread Johannes Schindelin
Hi, On Mon, 11 May 2009, Aaron Andrew Hunt wrote: On May 11, 2009, at 2:24 PM, lilypond-devel-requ...@gnu.org wrote: Dewdman, It might help to read this: http://linuxmafia.com/faq/Essays/smart-questions.html Very interesting link! It might as well be called In Defense of Being a Complete

Re: lilypond wikipedia

2009-04-22 Thread Johannes Schindelin
Hi, On Wed, 22 Apr 2009, Francisco Vila wrote: 2009/4/21 Helder Geovane Gomes de Lima heldergeov...@gmail.com: I would like to know if there is any progress about this topic. How is it going? (is it going?) Are you talking about - the LilyPond article on Wikipedia - the LilyPond

Re: good news for my PhD

2009-03-20 Thread Johannes Schindelin
Hi, On Fri, 20 Mar 2009, Nicolas Sceaux wrote: Le 20 mars 09 à 00:38, John Mandereau a écrit : 2) I might organize European vacations around other lilypond contributors, starting with a weekend in Paris. (not because I particularly want to see Paris -- I spent four days there

Re: good news for my PhD

2009-03-20 Thread Johannes Schindelin
Hi, On Fri, 20 Mar 2009, Valentin Villenave wrote: 2009/3/18 Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca: 2)  I might organize European vacations around other lilypond contributors, starting with a weekend in Paris. (not because I particularly want to see Paris -- I spent four

Re: Why is it _still_ so freaking hard to get info with images?

2009-03-16 Thread Johannes Schindelin
Hi, On Mon, 16 Mar 2009, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: as always, patches will be thoughtfully considered. It appears a bit disingenuous to me to answer I can't figure out what does what and why with congratulations, then it is your task to figure this out to a degree where you can not

Re: Why is it _still_ so freaking hard to get info with images?

2009-03-13 Thread Johannes Schindelin
Hi, On Fri, 13 Mar 2009, John Mandereau wrote: It might be nice if some developers made it into a habit to try building from a freshly checked out tree from time to time without reverting to their secret knowledge. I spent a lot of time testing compilation and installation of Info docs

Re: Why is it _still_ so freaking hard to get info with images?

2009-03-13 Thread Johannes Schindelin
Hi, On Fri, 13 Mar 2009, Carl D. Sorensen wrote: It might be nice if some developers made it into a habit to try building from a freshly checked out tree from time to time without reverting to their secret knowledge. Is it really necessary to get nasty? Like I said in another mail:

Re: Trojan in installation LilyPond

2009-03-09 Thread Johannes Schindelin
Hi, On Mon, 9 Mar 2009, Oriolus wrote: My malware scanner Norman discovered a trojan after installation of LilyPond: Location: C:\Program Files\LilyPond\usr\bin\guile.exe Trojan: W32/Smalldrp.ARAH Are you sure? These files are cross-compiled from Linux, so there is little

Re: CM 1.1 git question

2009-02-20 Thread Johannes Schindelin
Hi, On Fri, 20 Feb 2009, Jonathan Kulp wrote: Trevor Daniels wrote: More seriously, the patch doesn't apply here because your line numbering seems to be 1 off from the line numbers I have in git-starting.itexi. I have no idea why that should be. I believe my git repo is fully

Re: CM 1.1 git question

2009-02-20 Thread Johannes Schindelin
Hi, On Fri, 20 Feb 2009, Jonathan Kulp wrote: Johannes Schindelin wrote: No need to reclone. Just rename the current branch: $ git branch -m old.branch This part seemed to work fine. And then start anew (in the same repository!): $ git checkout -t origin/web (You

Re: CM 1.1 git question

2009-02-18 Thread Johannes Schindelin
Hi, On Wed, 18 Feb 2009, Graham Percival wrote: On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 05:53:06PM +0100, Johannes Schindelin wrote: 1. git-clone gets the entire repo, not just the particular branch that you want. Indeed, but as Git is pretty efficient, simplicity beats correctness here

Re: CM 1.1 git question

2009-02-18 Thread Johannes Schindelin
Hi. On Wed, 18 Feb 2009, Jonathan Kulp wrote: Am I correct in thinking that [git format-patch] creates the patch by comparing my local (changed) file with the corresponding file in the remote git repository? No, it creates patches from commits. So you use Git as usual: (inspect

Re: CM 1.1 git question

2009-02-18 Thread Johannes Schindelin
Hi, On Wed, 18 Feb 2009, Graham Percival wrote: On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 03:57:39PM +0100, Johannes Schindelin wrote: Hi. On Wed, 18 Feb 2009, Jonathan Kulp wrote: Am I correct in thinking that [git format-patch] creates the patch by comparing my local (changed) file

Re: CM 1.1 git question

2009-02-18 Thread Johannes Schindelin
Hi, On Wed, 18 Feb 2009, Jonathan Kulp wrote: Johannes Schindelin wrote: On Wed, 18 Feb 2009, Jonathan Kulp wrote: Am I correct in thinking that [git format-patch] creates the patch by comparing my local (changed) file with the corresponding file in the remote git repository

Re: CM 1.1 git question

2009-02-18 Thread Johannes Schindelin
Hi, On Wed, 18 Feb 2009, Jonathan Kulp wrote: Again, Johannes, many thanks for your patience in explaining this to a non-developer. :) You are very welcome! Thank you for your contributions, Dscho ___ lilypond-devel mailing list

Re: CM 1.1 git question

2009-02-18 Thread Johannes Schindelin
Hi, On Wed, 18 Feb 2009, Jonathan Kulp wrote: I realized after I sent it, though, that I sent it from my Thunderbird email client and this historically has jacked up the line endings. We had a very interesting discussion with one of the Thunderbirds on the Git list (who I dragged into the

Re: CM 1.1 git question

2009-02-18 Thread Johannes Schindelin
Hi, On Wed, 18 Feb 2009, Jonathan Kulp wrote: Johannes Schindelin wrote: Hi, On Wed, 18 Feb 2009, Jonathan Kulp wrote: I realized after I sent it, though, that I sent it from my Thunderbird email client and this historically has jacked up the line endings. Johannes

Re: CM 1.1 git question

2009-02-17 Thread Johannes Schindelin
Hi, On Tue, 17 Feb 2009, Graham Percival wrote: On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 06:36:24PM -0700, Andrew Hawryluk wrote: In the instructions for getting the source code, why not just use git-clone? Is there a difference? The currently suggested method of remote-add + checkout produces a bunch of

Re: CM 1.1 git question

2009-02-17 Thread Johannes Schindelin
Hi, On Tue, 17 Feb 2009, Jonathan Kulp wrote: Graham Percival wrote: 3. I'm not certain if git-clone sets up everything for doing git pull origin and git push origin. Yes, it does set things up properly. I first acquired the repo using the git-clone command and now I grab updates

Re: Good luck, Valentin

2009-02-05 Thread Johannes Schindelin
Hi, On Thu, 5 Feb 2009, Valentin Villenave wrote: 2009/2/5 Johannes Schindelin johannes.schinde...@gmx.de: How about $ git archive --prefix=opera_libre/ --format=zip HEAD: ? It would be just great if repo.or.cz offered this option out-of-the-box... Sure. I'll ask Pasky

Re: Good luck, Valentin

2009-02-05 Thread Johannes Schindelin
Hi, On Thu, 5 Feb 2009, Valentin Villenave wrote: 2009/2/5 Johannes Schindelin johannes.schinde...@gmx.de: How about $ git archive --prefix=opera_libre/ --format=zip HEAD: ? It would be just great if repo.or.cz offered this option out-of-the-box... Now it does. Thank

Re: Good luck, Valentin

2009-02-05 Thread Johannes Schindelin
Hi, On Thu, 5 Feb 2009, Tim Slattery wrote: Valentin Villenave v.villen...@gmail.com wrote: Hmm... You do have a point. I tend to assume anybody familiar enough with LilyPond knows what a tgz archive means, I'm reasonable familiar with Lilypond at this point, but I had to google tgz to

Re: OT: Some git statistics

2009-02-02 Thread Johannes Schindelin
Hi, On Mon, 2 Feb 2009, Francisco Vila wrote: - How could differently-written names for a given author to be joined on one? I guess you could write a .mailmap: http://www.kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-shortlog.html (section FILES). Ciao, Dscho

Re: lilypond wikipedia

2009-02-01 Thread Johannes Schindelin
Hi, On Mon, 2 Feb 2009, Werner LEMBERG wrote: There's an interesting discussion (since five years!) why lilypond can't be integrated into wikipedia yet: [...] Thanks you for bringing it to the proper place. I've been meaning to, but got too swamped in work. It did not exactly help my

Re: lilypond wikipedia

2009-02-01 Thread Johannes Schindelin
Hi, On Mon, 2 Feb 2009, Graham Percival wrote: On Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 12:26:02AM +0100, Werner LEMBERG wrote: Tim Starling, one of the main wikipeda software developers, says: My understanding is that a) safe mode is not secure, being trivially DoS-able by short

Re: Directory name of aux is invalid

2009-01-25 Thread Johannes Schindelin
Hi, On Sun, 25 Jan 2009, Paul Scott wrote: dem...@suffolk.lib.ny.us wrote: On Tue, Jan 6, 2009, Trevor Daniels t.dani...@treda.co.uk said: The names are case-insensitive, and they cannot be used as directory names or the first part of a filename (the bit before the dot).

Re: ideas for Google Summer of Code

2009-01-16 Thread Johannes Schindelin
Hi, On Fri, 16 Jan 2009, Reinhold Kainhofer wrote: On Friday 16 January 2009 02:46:22 Johannes Schindelin wrote: - the mentor is also expected to work almost full time at least in the beginning, Sorry, but from my experience with mentoring KDE projects, this is not really true

Re: ideas for Google Summer of Code

2009-01-16 Thread Johannes Schindelin
Hi, On Fri, 16 Jan 2009, Graham Percival wrote: On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 02:46:22AM +0100, Johannes Schindelin wrote: - just mentioning their wishes, as others have done, is likely to be a waste of time, not to mention an annoyance to the others, as _there have to be competent

Re: ideas for Google Summer of Code

2009-01-15 Thread Johannes Schindelin
Hi, On Thu, 15 Jan 2009, Jonathan Kulp wrote: Anne Ghisla wrote: Hello all, On Wednesday 14 January 2009 18:58:25 Johannes Schindelin wrote: On Wed, 14 Jan 2009, Carl D. Sorensen wrote: On 1/14/09 8:51 AM, Han-Wen Nienhuys hanw...@gmail.com wrote: I think we can be under

Re: ideas for Google Summer of Code

2009-01-15 Thread Johannes Schindelin
Hi, On Thu, 15 Jan 2009, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: Other pie-in-the sky: completely redo the part-combiner, using the music streams infrastructure. That would be nice. (unfortunately, no I don't have time to mentor.) But that probably means a no-go for any Lilypond project. Ciao, Dscho

Re: ideas for Google Summer of Code

2009-01-15 Thread Johannes Schindelin
Hi, On Fri, 16 Jan 2009, Graham Percival wrote: That said, SoC doesn't recognize the importance of documentation, Not true. For example, Drupal had a SoC project that was documentation-only, and I imagine other projects had as well. A full list of possible projects is on the google issue

Re: ideas for Google Summer of Code

2009-01-14 Thread Johannes Schindelin
Hi, On Tue, 13 Jan 2009, Joe Neeman wrote: I'd suggest you start by joining the Frogs [1]. Is somebody actually doing the work of applying for GSoC? AFAIK you have to be accepted as an organization, and you have to apply for that. Ciao, Dscho

Re: Git patch won't apply

2009-01-12 Thread Johannes Schindelin
Hi, On Mon, 12 Jan 2009, Trevor Daniels wrote: Valentin Villenave wrote Sunday, January 11, 2009 6:30 PM By the way, one sensible addition to the CG might be to invite Windows users to do git config global.autocrlf = false or something like that (by default under Windows, git

Re: Git patch won't apply

2009-01-11 Thread Johannes Schindelin
Hi, On Sun, 11 Jan 2009, Valentin Villenave wrote: 2009/1/10 Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca: CG! CG! CG! :) By the way, one sensible addition to the CG might be to invite Windows users to do git config global.autocrlf = false or something like that (by default under

Re: Git patch won't apply

2009-01-11 Thread Johannes Schindelin
Hi, On Sun, 11 Jan 2009, Valentin Villenave wrote: 2009/1/11 Johannes Schindelin johannes.schinde...@gmx.de: The next Windows Git installer will let the user choose which strategy to take. Great! You have no idea how much hair I have been pulling out about this :-) Actually, I do

Re: Lilypond on windows

2008-12-30 Thread Johannes Schindelin
Hi, On Tue, 30 Dec 2008, Valentin Villenave wrote: By the way, I had kept in mind that cross-compiling Python was not possible, but it seems that someone we know is trying hard to make it happen: http://bugs.python.org/issue1597850 Probably you kept the memory of my failed attempts at

Re: Lilypond on windows

2008-12-30 Thread Johannes Schindelin
Hi, On Mon, 29 Dec 2008, Trevor Daniels wrote: Stefan Waler wrote Monday, December 29, 2008 12:31 PM I'm just wondering what the actual requirements are for running lilypond with mingw on windows platforms. Is there any list for that? AFAIK no one has seriously tried to compile LP

Re: why is Dutch the default language for note-entry?

2008-12-18 Thread Johannes Schindelin
Hi, On Thu, 18 Dec 2008, Hans Aberg wrote: On 18 Dec 2008, at 22:28, dem...@suffolk.lib.ny.us wrote: Right. So the best one can hope for is a series of keyboard maps that perhaps unify groups of characters, that those that so like may use. The issue is to create a UTF-8 text file with

Re: why is Dutch the default language for note-entry?

2008-12-16 Thread Johannes Schindelin
Hi, On Tue, 16 Dec 2008, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 2:58 AM, Mark Polesky markpole...@yahoo.com wrote: Why is Dutch the default language for note-entry? English uses the fewest keystrokes. For comparison, here's a measure from Chopin's Fantasie-impromptu: because

Re: MacOS python/GUI issues

2008-10-06 Thread Johannes Schindelin
Hi, On Sat, 4 Oct 2008, Chris Sawer wrote: On Mac OS X 10.4.11 x86 double-clicking on the app does nothing. Launching the binary from the command line directly gives: ~ $ ./Desktop/LilyPond.app/Contents/MacOS/LilyPond Bus error Just a guess: if you want to compile something on 10.5 which

Re: GUB experiments on linux-64

2008-09-29 Thread Johannes Schindelin
Hi, On Sun, 28 Sep 2008, Josh Parmenter wrote: I get a crash with the following crashdump running from the command line. Hope that helps. I do not get a crash. Maybe it is because I have a Leopard (10.5) machine... However, opening LilyPond, I get a non-working menu. It is just empty. I

Re: GUB experiments on linux-64

2008-09-29 Thread Johannes Schindelin
Hi Josh, On Mon, 29 Sep 2008, Josh Parmenter wrote: I am on Leopard as well, 10.5.5, intel. Th GUI won't work... Han-Wen was asking about the binary inside.. You need to run it from the command line. That is why I added this in my original reply: Running lilypond from the command line

Re: git uncleaned history

2008-09-04 Thread Johannes Schindelin
Hi, On Thu, 4 Sep 2008, till Rettig wrote: - -) git checkout filename -- discards all non-committed changes to the file. I thought that works only if you remove the file before? No, it works also with dirty files, i.e. files that have been modified, but not committed. The only

Re: git uncleaned history

2008-09-04 Thread Johannes Schindelin
Hi, On Thu, 4 Sep 2008, Till Rettig wrote: Johannes Schindelin schrieb: You mean git reset --hard? That resets _all_ files. _And_ the staging area. Guess I meant that one -- I had sometimes problems with wrong commits that I didn't get reset somehow. As I understand, if I do a commit

Re: Transposable guitar fret diagrams

2008-07-31 Thread Johannes Schindelin
Hi, On Wed, 30 Jul 2008, Carl D. Sorensen wrote: I'd like to show a diff, but I'm not sure exactly how to get it. I have done the development work in a fretboards branch on my local machine. I have a current git repository in a master branch on my local machine. I have a remote repository

Re: Transposable guitar fret diagrams

2008-07-31 Thread Johannes Schindelin
Hi, On Thu, 31 Jul 2008, Carl D. Sorensen wrote: On 7/31/08 5:21 AM, Johannes Schindelin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, 30 Jul 2008, Carl D. Sorensen wrote: I'd like to show a diff, but I'm not sure exactly how to get it. I have done the development work in a fretboards branch

Re: separate git tree for docs

2008-07-27 Thread Johannes Schindelin
Hi, On Sun, 27 Jul 2008, Graham Percival wrote: A month or two ago, there was some discussion about changing the way git is managed, to allow doc writers to have permission to change Documentation/user/ but not other parts of the tree. At the time I begged everybody to shelve the

Re: Build requires t1asm

2008-07-18 Thread Johannes Schindelin
Hi, On Fri, 18 Jul 2008, Werner LEMBERG wrote: I can only repeat that IMHO it would be best to distribute the final fonts to reduce the dependencies. Let's do this if there is no objection. I oppose to this idea. Why? FWIW I also like the idea of having less dependencies, but

Re: Build requires t1asm

2008-07-18 Thread Johannes Schindelin
Hi, On Fri, 18 Jul 2008, Werner LEMBERG wrote: FWIW I also like the idea of having less dependencies, but not at the price of being unable to hack the source. Even if that is the source to a font. Well, adding pre-compiled fonts to the tarball just remove a dependency. As soon as

Re: Build requires t1asm

2008-07-18 Thread Johannes Schindelin
Hi, On Fri, 18 Jul 2008, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: Also, it would be nice if some of these perverse hackers could just add an autoconf check for said program. Heh, I am a bit short on time. But sure, I'll try to come up with a patch this afternoon. BTW installing LilyPond with checkinstall

Re: Build requires t1asm

2008-07-18 Thread Johannes Schindelin
Hi, On Fri, 18 Jul 2008, John Mandereau wrote: On 2008/07/18 08:48 -0300, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: Also, it would be nice if some of these perverse hackers could just add an autoconf check for said program. I added a check for t1asm, but I didn't add a check for a particular version, I

Re: Not for evryone yet!

2008-07-16 Thread Johannes Schindelin
Hi, On Wed, 16 Jul 2008, Tom Richard wrote: Hard core reality check folks. Either do it right or not at all. That was totally unnecessary, especially given the fact that just a _small_ web search would have turned up a _few_ GUIs. Don't waste my time, Dscho

Re: Not for evryone yet!

2008-07-16 Thread Johannes Schindelin
Hi, On Wed, 16 Jul 2008, Francisco Vila wrote: Maybe it is not intended exactly to compose in the first place, but if you are a composer and want to show your scores neat enough as to amaze others, give LilyPond a try. To enhance on that: if you are a musician familiar with computers for

Re: Git push commands

2008-07-04 Thread Johannes Schindelin
Hi, On Thu, 3 Jul 2008, Carl D. Sorensen wrote: I'm now able to push changes to the repository, but every time I do a push, I get two commits -- one for the changes I made, and one for a merge. Funny. For another project I am working on, I wrote an introduction for exactly this, a couple

Re: plz help about lily.......

2008-06-22 Thread Johannes Schindelin
Hi, On Sat, 21 Jun 2008, Trevor Daniels wrote: John Mandereau wrote Saturday, June 21, 2008 7:48 PM Are you sure it's not possible to build LilyPond on Windows with MinGW? AFAIK nobody has ever done it, but it's certainly possible, maybe with some changes in the build system needed.

Re: Git conflicts

2008-06-22 Thread Johannes Schindelin
Hi, On Sun, 22 Jun 2008, Rune Zedeler wrote: Johannes Schindelin skrev: FWIW the proper way to undo a merge is to $ git rebase --onto MERGE_HEAD^ MERGE_HEAD where MERGE_HEAD has to be substituted by the merge commit that you want to undo. (This command transplants the commits

Re: Git conflicts

2008-06-21 Thread Johannes Schindelin
Hi, On Sat, 21 Jun 2008, Rune Zedeler wrote: Valentin Villenave skrev: When I merged your branch several weeks ago I didn't encounter any problem. So I must have screwed up something when you asked me to revert this merge... I do not think you did anything wrong. My guess is that

Re: Git conflicts

2008-06-20 Thread Johannes Schindelin
Hi, On Fri, 20 Jun 2008, Rune Zedeler wrote: Valentin Villenave skrev: Yes, AFAICR I did it all by the book. Mainline is the branch you want to come back to, I think. Ok, in that case I see no point in reverting and trying again. The result should be the same. Hmm, perhaps the best

RE: Membership request for group GNU LilyPond Music Typesetter

2008-06-17 Thread Johannes Schindelin
Hi, On Mon, 16 Jun 2008, Carl D. Sorensen wrote: Thanks for your help. Just helping me see what I should expect to get if things were working right was important. You're welcome! Ciao, Dscho ___ lilypond-devel mailing list

Re: Is there any source code exist for LilyPond on Microsoft .Net or Microsoft Windows API?

2008-06-17 Thread Johannes Schindelin
Hi, On Sun, 15 Jun 2008, Hamid Reza Nasiri wrote: No, there is not. You can try, though: you only need a few libraries installed, such as freetype and libguile, and the rest should be pure C++. Make sure that you keep us posted of your progress. Hth, Dscho

RE: Membership request for group GNU LilyPond Music Typesetter

2008-06-14 Thread Johannes Schindelin
Hi, On Fri, 13 Jun 2008, Carl D. Sorensen wrote: From: Johannes Schindelin [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 13, 2008 2:40 PM To: Carl D. Sorensen Cc: lilypond-devel@gnu.org Subject: Re: Membership request for group GNU LilyPond Music Typesetter

Re: Membership request for group GNU LilyPond Music Typesetter

2008-06-13 Thread Johannes Schindelin
Hi, [please Cc: me, even if I am subscribed to this list; I will more likely miss your mail within the 200+ mails I get every day.] On Fri, 13 Jun 2008, Carl D. Sorensen wrote: Johannes Schindelin Johannes.Schindelin at gmx.de writes: The easiest way would be to fetch the csorensen fork

RE: Membership request for group GNU LilyPond Music Typesetter

2008-06-12 Thread Johannes Schindelin
Hi, On Thu, 12 Jun 2008, Carl D. Sorensen wrote: From: Johannes Schindelin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Mon, 2 Jun 2008, Carl D. Sorensen wrote: I built a fork, but was not successful in getting it merged. Probably something with windows, git, and ssh not working well

RE: Membership request for group GNU LilyPond Music Typesetter

2008-06-02 Thread Johannes Schindelin
Hi, On Mon, 2 Jun 2008, Carl D. Sorensen wrote: I built a fork, but was not successful in getting it merged. Probably something with windows, git, and ssh not working well together for me. I must have missed that. Can I be of assistance? Ciao, Dscho

Re: Arg still having problems with the gub build

2008-06-01 Thread Johannes Schindelin
Hi, On Sun, 1 Jun 2008, Mark Hanlon wrote: I run everything as root. Here's what I do: mkdir gub cd gub git init git pull git://git.sv.gnu.org/lilypond.git gub: Note that this will not set up automatic merge information, so that git pull without further arguments does not

  1   2   3   4   >