Hi Mike,
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 4:55 AM, m...@apollinemike.com
m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
Hey all,
I see a shortcut for utf-8-strings in pango-font.cc. This is
all well and good except that it is hard to do box
approximations on these guys (it'd require adding lots of code).
How mad
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 7:19 PM, Patrick McCarty pnor...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 4:55 AM, m...@apollinemike.com
m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
Hey all,
I see a shortcut for utf-8-strings in pango-font.cc. This is
all well and good except that it is hard to do box
On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 8:52 AM, Phil Holmes em...@philholmes.net wrote:
To verify that a patch Issue has been fixed, we check the commit. Using
the git web interface, is there a way to find the commit from the commitish?
I've tried but can't find a way, but I'm assuming I'm missing something.
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 3:30 AM, Ian Hulin ianhuli...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu 18 Aug 2011 07:50:28 BST, pnor...@gmail.com wrote:
The load-order issue appears to be fixed, testing with git and guile 1.8
and 2.0.2. Ignoring whitespace changes, this patch LGTM.
Some more shuffling is needed to
On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 4:01 PM, Graham Percival
gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
Proposal: let’s follow PEP-8.
http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0008/
* use 4 spaces per indentation level
* never max tabs and spaces
* Code indented with a mixture of tabs and spaces should be
On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 4:18 PM, Graham Percival
gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
To whoever enjoys this stuff,
:-)
2) make release/unstable be exactly what we have in master.
I've just taken care of this.
Regards,
Patrick
___
lilypond-devel mailing
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 8:15 AM, Graham Percival
gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
What's the plan+status of these?
I'd like to have the first release candidate for 2.16 in 3-4
months. If we think that we can sort out any problems with those
dependencies... or any other build dependencies, for
Hi Mike,
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 4:08 PM, m...@apollinemike.com
m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
I've been getting this from LilyPond recently:
programming error: Parsed object should be dead: static scm_unused_struct*
Prob::mark_smob(scm_unused_struct*)
continuing, cross fingers
This usually
Hi Bernardo,
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 9:10 PM, Patrick McCarty pnor...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2011-03-29, Bernardo Barros wrote:
I think we might need some little changes to compile lilypond with gcc 4.
I'm getting the following errors with latest git.
http://pastebin.com/gjsLv0Fe
My guess
Hi,
In the future, please send messages like this to -devel. I don't
think everyone on -user wants to see these nasty linker errors...
On 2011-03-29, Bernardo Barros wrote:
I think we might need some little changes to compile lilypond with gcc 4.
I'm getting the following errors with latest
On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 7:00 AM, Graham Percival
gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
Hi Mike,
Could I introduce you to the wonders of git-rebase ? In
particular:
git rebase -i master^^
(however many ^ you need to cover all your recent work)
This lets you clean up your git history before
On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 4:38 AM, Ian Hulin ianhuli...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Patrick,
On 18/02/11 02:13, pnor...@gmail.com wrote:
LGTM.
Can you email me your patch so I can apply it?
Here's the patch.
I retested everything, and the patch checks out just fine. I've pushed it.
Thanks,
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 10:04 AM, Graham Percival
gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
I don't see a need to support both guile 1.8.x and guile 2.0.x at
the same time -- as far as I'm concerned, we can drop any
guile-1.x-isms as soon as 2.15 begins.
Uh, I'm not sure what you mean here. I have a
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 7:22 PM, Graham Percival
gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 07:08:29PM -0800, Patrick McCarty wrote:
I have a patch queue with
(potential) fixes for LilyPond so that we can support both Guile 1.8
and 2.0.
Great! Comment 5 of
http
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 6:28 AM, Patrick Schmidt p.l.schm...@gmx.de wrote:
I tried to upload three patches to rietveld. I got the message:
pls@pls:~/lilypond-git$ git pull -r
Current branch master is up to date.
pls@pls:~/lilypond-git$ git cl upload origin/master
Cannot upload with a dirty
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 9:51 AM, Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net wrote:
I'm checking some of the lyric-based issues in case they've been fixed in
the latest release, and came back across
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1294
[snip]
{
\time 3/4
\relative c' { c2 e4 g2
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 1:04 PM, Graham Percival
gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
We have two ways of making it not a Critical issue:
1) make the output the same. If that means fiddling with the
release-2.14 branch of GUB, fine. If that means changing stuff in
lilypond git, fine. If that
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 9:51 AM, Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net wrote:
Now - there's one other interesting feature here. If I delete the fourth
line of the lyrics above (the one with the explicit font) and run Lily
2.13.49, saving the PS file, it has the following in the postscript header:
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 3:56 AM, Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net wrote:
Francisco Vila reported that postprocess-html.py also has references to CSS
files. This patch corrects that file to use the new CSS filenames and get
rid of the alternatives. It makes clean on my system. Could someone
On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 8:45 AM, Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu wrote:
On 1/29/11 6:20 AM, Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 11:19:10PM -0800, Patrick McCarty wrote:
I meant to post this to -devel a while ago, but I opened a Github
tracker issue
Hello,
I meant to post this to -devel a while ago, but I opened a Github
tracker issue for GUB.
Here's the link:
https://github.com/janneke/gub/issues#issue/2
Thanks,
Patrick
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Hi Mike,
On 2010-12-22, Mike Solomon wrote:
Hey all,
I am embarking on a new project to make lily dance.
Attached are 3 files:
1) svgdance.svg (best viewed in something that's not Internet
Explorer - click on the notes and/or accidentals and see what
happens!)
Very cool!
3)
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 4:29 AM, Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net wrote:
David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net writes:
Well - because it's unusual. Far more common to have a sharp on a
natural note in the key sig, or a natural on a flat, for example.
And a
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 3:53 PM, Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu wrote:
On 12/14/10 10:26 AM, Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net wrote:
There are currently 8 issues to verify that could and should have been
verified. I've asked the bug squad to check them, and I've been over them
myself and I
Hello,
I can't run `make doc' due to a compile failure on git master (as of
commit 75cdeeefba1e4762a29b5f418b8d6294a0eba18e).
The relevant snippet that fails is in fretted-strings.itely:
\version 2.13.42
\include predefined-ukulele-fretboards.ly
myChords = \chordmode { a1 a:m a:aug }
On 2010-12-11, Patrick McCarty wrote:
I can't run `make doc' due to a compile failure on git master (as of
commit 75cdeeefba1e4762a29b5f418b8d6294a0eba18e).
Valentin, do you have a fix for this?
The patch below seems to work. Is this the correct fix?
diff --git a/ly/predefined-ukulele
On 2010-12-12, Valentin Villenave wrote:
On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 11:17 PM, Patrick McCarty pnor...@gmail.com wrote:
The patch below seems to work. Is this the correct fix?
Of course! Please push asap.
Okay, pushed.
Thanks,
Patrick
___
lilypond
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 1:50 AM, Francisco Vila paconet@gmail.com wrote:
Hello. I am translating the program gettext file. What's the point of
emphasizing words with @var{} in msgid's? Is the output
(warning/errors etc) of the program to be processed by texinfo?
I think the intent is to
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 6:40 AM, Graham Percival
gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 04:19:59PM +0200, Dave Plater wrote:
I'll try the texlive-bin maintainer. Is this going to be a problem with
2.13.42 do you think?
I expect it would still be a problem. Or rather, if
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 5:02 PM, Mark Polesky markpole...@yahoo.com wrote:
I found these in paper-defaults-init.ly:
#(define make-header (...))
#(define make-footer (...))
#(define font-defaults '((...)))
#(define text-font-defaults `((...)))
1) Do we need the quasiquote ` for
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 11:33 PM, Graham Percival
gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
2) release 2.14 ASAP with no critical flaws, but with some kind of
code freeze.
Many software projects implement a freeze before a release --
when the project is frozen, this means that no changes are
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 9:29 AM, Valentin Villenave
valen...@villenave.net wrote:
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 6:22 PM, Patrick McCarty pnor...@gmail.com wrote:
I also think it would be useful to have two code freezes on
stable/2.14: one for code/docs, and one for translations (right before
On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 10:56 AM, Mark Polesky markpole...@yahoo.com wrote:
Trevor Daniels wrote:
...I'd prefer a blank line before and after every @item
including the first one...
+1
But only because I'm too lazy to fix the paragraph
formatting command in Vim (gqap), which turns this:
On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 8:17 AM, David Santamauro
david.santama...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, 13 Nov 2010 07:32:06 -0700 Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu wrote:
The second state is in the form of scheme music expressions. The job
of the parser is to convert lilypond music expressions into
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 12:11 PM, Ian Hulin ianhuli...@gmail.com wrote:
Patch with amended title attached.
Thanks Ian. I've pushed your patch to git master.
Regards,
Patrick
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 7:30 AM, Mark Polesky markpole...@yahoo.com wrote:
All right, hopefully everyone here won't mind one last vote,
so please state your preference among the following:
SPACE MINIMUM-DISTANCE
-- --
1) basic-distance
On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 7:55 AM, Graham Percival
gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
Bug squad: Phil is busy with the opening of a musical, so it would be
nice if somebody else could check the regression test comparisons for
both 2.13.37 and 2.13.38. It would be a shame if some horrible bug
was
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 5:32 AM, Christoph s...@smurky.de wrote:
Is there a way to have point-click-behavoir or any semantic
meta-information about the correspondending postion in
the .ly-file in SVGs that a generated with the SVG-Backend (like in PDFs?).
Not currently, but it should be
Hi Ian,
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 2:31 PM, Ian Hulin i...@hulin.org.uk wrote:
I've just done some stuff with this file to ensure it compiles OK when
running using Guile V1.9.
It declares all it stuff in a module (define-module (scm dislplay-lily)
It currently gets loaded by lily.scm as part
On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 8:22 PM, Graham Percival
gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
We're about 10-20 hours of work away from having 0 Critical
issues. On one hand, that sounds great; we're almost there! On
the other hand, we've been in this state for the past month. I'm
not seeing a lot of
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 6:06 AM, Valentin Villenave
valen...@villenave.net wrote:
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 3:02 PM, Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu wrote:
As near as I can tell, this code is triggering an infinite loop that fails
when the scheme heap overflows.
Interesting.
arg is *not* a
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 8:02 AM, John Mandereau
john.mander...@gmail.com wrote:
Il giorno lun, 18/10/2010 alle 09.20 -0700, Patrick McCarty ha scritto:
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 9:17 AM, John Mandereau
john.mander...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't understand the issue; can't you just set PYTHON
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 11:31 AM, Ian Hulin ianhuli...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Patrick,
Patch is attached.
Thanks, I've pushed it.
Regards,
Patrick
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 2:50 AM, Valentin Villenave
valen...@villenave.net wrote:
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 2:38 AM, Patrick McCarty pnor...@gmail.com wrote:
Arch Linux will be migrating to Python 3 very soon, and I'm trying to
figure out what to do with regard to LilyPond's build system. I
On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 11:19 PM, Mark Polesky markpole...@yahoo.com wrote:
Patrick McCarty wrote:
Huh. I've been following the Arch Linux development list
for a while, but it didn't occur to me that they were
doing something radically different than the recommended
policy
On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 5:59 PM, Graham Percival
gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 05:38:20PM -0700, Patrick McCarty wrote:
--) Two scripts still have /usr/bin/python lines
(python/auxiliar/manuals_definitions.py, and scripts/build/pytt.py).
Those should be changed
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 9:17 AM, John Mandereau
john.mander...@gmail.com wrote:
Il giorno lun, 18/10/2010 alle 09.02 -0700, Patrick McCarty ha scritto:
Yes, but unfortunately, LilyPond needs special sed treatment, since
many substitutions are made *after* configure time. I will need to
file
Hello,
Arch Linux will be migrating to Python 3 very soon, and I'm trying to
figure out what to do with regard to LilyPond's build system. I don't
know if Arch Linux is the first distribution upgrading to Python 3,
but this migration will be happening any day now.
The distribution-wide policy
On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 8:30 PM, Benjamin Peterson benja...@python.org wrote:
Patrick McCarty pnorcks at gmail.com writes:
Arch Linux will be migrating to Python 3 very soon,
What does this mean? $ python will give Python 3?
Yes.
If so, that's no good. python3 is supposed to be the name
Hi Graham,
With GCC 4.5.1, I'm seeing a compile failure with latest git.
Reverting your commit edd89894 fixes it. Here's the error:
context-def.cc: In static member function 'static scm_unused_struct*
Context_def::mark_smob(scm_unused_struct*)':
context-def.cc:118:1: error: expected 'while'
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 6:54 PM, Graham Percival
gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 2:30 AM, Patrick McCarty pnor...@gmail.com wrote:
With GCC 4.5.1, I'm seeing a compile failure with latest git.
Reverting your commit edd89894 fixes it. Here's the error:
context-def.cc
On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 10:27 AM, pnor...@gmail.com wrote:
I just tested this change with Guile 1.9, and everything checked out,
though I didn't test Guile 1.8. I did a build from scratch and
eliminated the cache from ~/.cache/guile just to be sure.
Can you verify?
I'm testing with the
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 7:29 AM, James james.l...@datacore.com wrote:
Hello,
Occasionally when i run 'git pull -r' in a terminal I get the following
jl...@jlowenetbuntu:~/lilypond-git$ git pull -r
usage: git merge-base [-a|--all] commit commit...
-a, --all outputs all common
On 2010-09-12, Mark Polesky wrote:
So, I'm trying to start a fork at
http://repo.or.cz/w/lilypond/mpolesky.git, but I get:
$ git push --dry-run
ow...@repo.or.cz's password:
[3 attempts here, then...]
Permission denied (publickey,password).
fatal: The remote end hung up unexpectedly
I
Hi,
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 11:53 AM, Matthias Kilian
k...@outback.escape.de wrote:
a fellow openbsd developer noticed that the 2.12.3 source tarball
(http://download.linuxaudio.org/lilypond/sources/v2.12/lilypond-2.12.3.tar.gz)
differs from the same version from late december (december,
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 10:10 PM, Graham Percival
gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
Hi Patrick,
I disagree most vehemently with your fix in
af68a98e6c142e3479498b49ae924919efa94c77
Yes, it wasn't really a typo fix, but the word experimented doesn't
really make sense to me in this context. What
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 10:17 PM, Patrick McCarty pnor...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 10:10 PM, Graham Percival
gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
Hi Patrick,
I disagree most vehemently with your fix in
af68a98e6c142e3479498b49ae924919efa94c77
Yes, it wasn't really a typo fix
On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 5:23 PM, Patrick McCarty pnor...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 4:10 PM, Trevor Daniels t.dani...@treda.co.uk wrote:
The mingw binary of 2.13.30 gives the following error
under Vista on my system:
Running lilypond-book
Traceback (most recent call last
On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 4:10 PM, Trevor Daniels t.dani...@treda.co.uk wrote:
The mingw binary of 2.13.30 gives the following error
under Vista on my system:
Running lilypond-book
Traceback (most recent call last):
File c:/program files/lilypond/usr/bin/lilypond-book.py, line 86, in ?
On 2010-08-11, Graham Percival wrote:
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 08:32:24AM +0100, Trevor Daniels wrote:
Is there any requirement to continue with the alternate
css files in the web? These were set up, IIRC, to enable
people to view and comment on alternative designs, but
we seem to have
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 4:45 AM, Trevor Daniels t.dani...@treda.co.uk wrote:
While looking into the @help in download.itexi (the font size used for
smallexample) I
noticed that the css file currently being used to
build the web is css/lilypond-web.css. Is this
correct? The css title is
On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 1:03 PM, pnor...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2010/07/29 19:24:46, Neil Puttock wrote:
+ = scm_list_3 (ly_symbol2scm (module-use!), mod, used);
This effectively exports all bindings, so all local defines are
now exported.
In the case of `profile-property-access.ly', the
On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 2:02 PM, Neil Puttock n.putt...@gmail.com wrote:
On 1 August 2010 21:49, Patrick McCarty pnor...@gmail.com wrote:
I think I found the problem.
With Guile 1.9, `module-public-interface' doesn't return an interface
for `the-scm-module', which we rely on:
scheme@(guile
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 10:49 AM, Graham Percival
gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
Why on earth do we have a
filetype off
set runtimepath
filetype on
in the suggested .vimrc ? Those lines should be unnecessary.
I need those lines to work around behavior that (I think) changed in
very recent
On 2010-07-27, Graham Percival wrote:
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 11:15:36AM -0700, Patrick McCarty wrote:
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 10:49 AM, Graham Percival
gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
Why on earth do we have a
filetype off
set runtimepath
filetype on
in the suggested .vimrc
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 4:50 PM, Graham Percival
gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 12:43:40PM -0700, Patrick McCarty wrote:
IMO, that method is more reliable, and I don't have to worry about
modifying a ~/.vim/filetype.vim for LilyPond.
Dudes! This is way simpler than
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 4:58 PM, Patrick McCarty pnor...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 4:50 PM, Graham Percival
gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 12:43:40PM -0700, Patrick McCarty wrote:
IMO, that method is more reliable, and I don't have to worry about
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 4:50 PM, Graham Percival
gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 12:43:40PM -0700, Patrick McCarty wrote:
IMO, that method is more reliable, and I don't have to worry about
modifying a ~/.vim/filetype.vim for LilyPond.
Dudes! This is way simpler than
On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 11:45 AM, Graham Percival
gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
I'm a bit suspicious about commit
4578dfbfdab5704ffc5317adfb252cb242f30115
1. AFAIK, we definitely want people creating or modifying
~/.vim/filetype.vim
It's just possible that it might be on a different
Hi Colin,
On 2010-07-25, Colin Campbell wrote:
As I understand it, the supported filetype.vim and vimrc are only
found in the /vim directory of a source tree.
I wouldn't call either of files *supported*, since as far as I can
see, neither of them have ever been installed on a user's system.
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 4:51 AM, Mike Solomon mike...@ufl.edu wrote:
Hey all,
In compiling lilypond this morning, I saw this:
font-metric.cc:82: warning: unused parameter 'k'
Checking out the function in question, I saw this:
Box
Font_metric::get_indexed_char_dimensions (size_t k)
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 11:43 AM, Patrick McCarty pnor...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 4:51 AM, Mike Solomon mike...@ufl.edu wrote:
Hey all,
In compiling lilypond this morning, I saw this:
font-metric.cc:82: warning: unused parameter 'k'
Checking out the function in question
Hi Jan,
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 1:56 AM, Jan Nieuwenhuizen
janneke-l...@xs4all.nl wrote:
While I appreciate your working on lilypad, I doubt
whether this is an efficient way of spending our efforts.
Yeah, I'm getting a little carried away. :)
I'm starting to think it would be difficult
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 6:20 AM, Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu wrote:
On 7/18/10 2:56 AM, Jan Nieuwenhuizen janneke-l...@xs4all.nl wrote:
It could be smart to work together with gummi,
possibly there are better programs than gummi,
possibly we're better off stealing their technology
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 6:25 PM, Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu wrote:
On 7/18/10 3:11 PM, Jan Nieuwenhuizen janneke-l...@xs4all.nl wrote:
Op zondag 18-07-2010 om 13:35 uur [tijdzone -0700], schreef Patrick
McCarty:
I think if we roll our own LilyPad, and borrow a lot of ideas from
gummi
Hi,
Here is a patch for GUB that fixes an uninstallation issue for Windows
LilyPad:
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1179
Thanks,
Patrick
From 8cab842cd79ca0fcb9b1d26a361c19441feea057 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Patrick McCarty pnor...@gmail.com
Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2010 14:01
script
improvements from this wiki page:
http://nsis.sourceforge.net/Uninstall_only_installed_files
Let me know if there are any problems.
Thanks,
Patrick
From eadbbae85fa146c57e806b98a96653987c1635af Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Patrick McCarty pnor...@gmail.com
Date: Sat, 10 Jul 2010 20:44:02 -0700
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 5:47 AM, Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu wrote:
On 6/16/10 1:58 AM, flup2 phili...@philmassart.net wrote:
I would like to know if somebody knows how conductng signs (
http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=259
http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=259 ) are created by
On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 5:34 AM, Werner LEMBERG w...@gnu.org wrote:
From a syntactical point of view, I can't see an immediate benefit of
saying
#path:miter
instead of
#'miter
Hm? Could you explain what constitutes a syntactical point of
view in your book?
I probably
Hello,
This is a feature I've wanted to add to LilyPond for a while, and I've
posted a patch set on Rietveld:
http://codereview.appspot.com/1730044/show
Any comments are appreciated, especially regarding the syntactic
requirements of the new command.
Thanks,
Patrick
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 3:24 PM, Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu wrote:
I'm trying to do regression test checking, but it doesn't seem to be working
right.
I did
make test-baseline
Then I switched to my new branch and did
make make check
I found some differences, so I patched the
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 6:09 PM, Pap Lôrinc paplor...@yahoo.com wrote:
HTH
- Thanks Carl, but I've applied the imagemagick patch, did a long clean and
make all, but the make check failed in the same place.
Version: ImageMagick 6.5.7-8 2009-11-26 Q16 http://www.imagemagick.org
Copyright:
On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 6:43 AM, Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu wrote:
So I'd like to propose that we have the task of changing \eyeglasses from
make-postscript-markup to 'path be a Frog task.
Any takers?
I'll take care of it. I've added new issues to keep track of my progress:
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 9:17 AM, Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu wrote:
On 6/17/10 9:48 AM, Neil Puttock n.putt...@gmail.com wrote:
On 17 June 2010 16:42, Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu wrote:
The problem I have is that after the assertion fails, the temp directory is
removed:
2010/6/6 josé henrique padovani zepadov...@gmail.com:
Just to be sure: Is it possible to set different caps with the path routine?
(I didn't found this option)
If not, would it be possible to add an optional variable to set it and have
it working on both ps and svg backends?
It's not possible
2010/6/6 Patrick McCarty pnor...@gmail.com:
2010/6/6 josé henrique padovani zepadov...@gmail.com:
Just to be sure: Is it possible to set different caps with the path routine?
(I didn't found this option)
If not, would it be possible to add an optional variable to set it and have
it working
On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 10:44 AM, Graham Percival
gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
Since
Issue 963: check dependency versions for 2.14
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=963
is closed, I am extremely reluctant to bump requirements now.
According to configure.in,
On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 6:36 AM, Neil Puttock n.putt...@gmail.com wrote:
2010/6/4 Patrick McCarty pnor...@gmail.com:
Another option is to use the 'path routine. This isn't documented yet
and is a little cumbersome to use, but you can find an example that
uses 'path in this snippet:
http
On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 6:43 AM, Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu wrote:
On 6/6/10 7:36 AM, Neil Puttock n.putt...@gmail.com wrote:
2010/6/4 Patrick McCarty pnor...@gmail.com:
Another option is to use the 'path routine. This isn't documented yet
and is a little cumbersome to use, but you can
On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 12:16 PM, Patrick McCarty pnor...@gmail.com wrote:
I think that using 'path would be the better option, also the circles
and semicircle will be a little tricky to code.
This should say ... though the circles and semicircle will be a
little tricky to code.
Thanks
2010/6/6 josé henrique padovani zepadov...@gmail.com:
Em 06/06/10 15:33, Patrick McCarty escreveu:
Looking into this more, I see two issues:
1) What names should we use for the different linecap options?
2) Where should these values be specified?
Any thoughts (about syntax, or otherwise
2010/6/4 josé henrique padovani zepadov...@gmail.com:
I am trying to generate svg files of my score, where I use some \postscript
markups. Everything goes ok, except those markups...
I get this warning and the svg file comes without the postcript drawings...
warning: missing stencil
From: Patrick McCarty pnor...@gmail.com
Date: Sun, 23 May 2010 13:30:06 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] Initialize interval in grob_stencil_extent().
There is a chance of returning garbage values from grob_stencil_extent()
due to this uninitialized variable issue.
---
lily/grob.cc |2 +-
1 files changed
On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 3:39 PM, Han-Wen Nienhuys hanw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 12:30 AM, Patrick McCarty pnor...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
Is this patch correct?
Interval has a default constructor, so in general addinig
initialization is not necessary. You can check
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 7:25 AM, Graham Percival
gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 11:19 AM, James Lowe james.l...@datacore.com wrote:
Hello,
Mark Polesky wrote:
Did you guys not see Neil's reply?
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2010-05/msg8.html
On 2010-05-09, Graham Percival wrote:
Sorry to do this, but we need another bug squad person, starting from
1 week ago and lasting until 1 month after 2.14.0. Patrick? Mark?
Trevor? Any of you willing?
Sure, I could devote some time for this.
We'll skip over the customary review of all
On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 11:24 AM, Graham Percival
gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
I'm not certain it's a texi2html bug, or a bug in our texi2html init
file, but either way it should be in the tracker.
Bug Squad: please add this. Type-build, priority-medium.
Added as:
Hi Carl,
After looking through the regtest comparison for 2.13.19/2.13.20, I
noticed that flag glyphs have changed shape. I posted a tracker issue
for this:
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1075
I assume this is related to your recent changes to the Metafont code,
but I can't
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 8:32 PM, Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu wrote:
On 4/27/10 10:49 PM, Nathan Reed nathaniel.r...@gmail.com wrote:
Lilypond would attempt to delete the output PDF before overwriting it in
Windows
(but no other platforms). This is unnecessary and causes problems with
On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 11:53 PM, Patrick McCarty pnor...@gmail.com wrote:
After looking through the regtest comparison for 2.13.19/2.13.20, I
noticed that flag glyphs have changed shape. I posted a tracker issue
for this:
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1075
I assume
1 - 100 of 741 matches
Mail list logo
