Re: LilyPond 2.24.0 released!

Great!  Thanks to everyone involved!! Any idea when there will be a Debian package?  (Not that I can't install it the way I have done the all the other 2.23.x versions). Paul On 12/15/22 2:42 PM, Jonas Hahnfeld via Discussions on LilyPond development wrote: We are proud to announce the

Re: LilyPond 2.23.7 released

I just downloaded the Linux version from from Lily web site and got a tar.gz version instead of the .sh version I expected. Is this a change or a mistake? Thank you, Paul > On Mar 26, 2022, at 2:36 PM, Jonas Hahnfeld via LilyPond user discussion > wrote: > > We are happy to announce the

\fixed and \relative

Would it be reasonable to have \fixed optionally take it's starting point from its first pitch like \relative does?  I jumped on this when this feature was added to \relative.  \fixed was the important reason I have now switched completely from \relative to \absolute. Am I missing anything

Re: official GNU LilyPond maintainer

On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 05:25:08AM +, Graham Percival wrote: > With David stepping down, LilyPond is left without an official GNU > maintanier. Does anybody want to do fill this role? The relevant > documentation is: > https://www.gnu.org/prep/standards/html_node/index.html >

Re: Stepping up, contributor mentoring

On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 03:11:42PM -0800, Graham Percival wrote: > Hi all, I'm back. Welcome back!! > (I was planning on waiting until the new year, but David's news > made me re-evaluate my health now, and I think I have the energy > to take on more stuff. To make a long story short:

Re: Printing movement titles in page header

goes outside of (below) the score block. HTH Paul Scott \version 2.19.22 \header { title = My Piece composer = Me tagline = ##f % piece only prints in header if set here or in bookpart header piece = Global Piece } \paper { oddHeaderMarkup = \markup \fill-line

Re: the website is offline

. It's back. Paul Scott - Mark It is. If it's not back tomorrow, I'll follow it up. -- Phil Holmes ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Re: 06 June, 2011.

Yeayyy!!! Thanks for all the hard work!! Paul Scott On 06/05/2011 04:00 PM, Graham Percival wrote: It is now 00:00:10 BST on 06 June, 2011. I see precisely zero open Critical issues, and precisely zero Critical issues waiting to be verified. If you have been holding your breath, you can

Re: Quesgion about breakbefore in \header { }

On 03/29/2011 01:14 PM, James Lowe wrote: Hello, From: lilypond-devel-bounces+james.lowe=datacore@gnu.org [lilypond-devel-bounces+james.lowe=datacore@gnu.org] on behalf of Paul Scott [waterho...@ultrasw.com] Sent: 24 March 2011 21:19

Re: Quesgion about breakbefore in \header { }

..} } Paul Scott ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Re: Fwd: Music Glossary - 1.64 Concert Pitch

On Tue, Jul 06, 2010 at 11:54:29AM +0100, Wols Lists wrote: quote: The trombones are a special case: although they are said to be 'in F' (alto or bass) or 'in B-flat' (tenor), this refers to their fundamental note, not to their parts' transposition. (In fact, the trombones' parts are

Re: Fwd: Music Glossary - 1.64 Concert Pitch

On 07/07/2010 04:06 PM, Wols Lists wrote: On 07/07/10 19:06, Paul Scott wrote: On Tue, Jul 06, 2010 at 11:54:29AM +0100, Wols Lists wrote: quote: The trombones are a special case: although they are said to be 'in F' (alto or bass) or 'in B-flat' (tenor), this refers to their fundamental

Re: Fwd: Music Glossary - 1.64 Concert Pitch

On Tue, Jul 06, 2010 at 11:54:29AM +0100, Wols Lists wrote: quote: The trombones are a special case: although they are said to be 'in F' (alto or bass) or 'in B-flat' (tenor), this refers to their fundamental note, not to their parts' transposition. (In fact, the trombones' parts are

Re: LilyPond 2.13.21 released [correction]

and libraries that will be used for the next stable release. download.linuxaudio.org seems to be unavailable at the moment. Paul Scott ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Re: texi2html web page, second attempt

for the information that's on the website. For what it's worth, I almost always go to the pdf manual first when I need to find something. Just for balance I always go to the HTML manual. Paul Scott ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel

Re: unexpected \unfoldRepeats behavior

Jay Anderson wrote: On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 4:53 PM, Paul Scottpsl...@ultrasw.com wrote: Which is kind of ridiculous if you're writing an ensemble piece with many (even more than one) voices/parts. How can a midi of a multi-voice work with any repeats be done? I was working on a large

Re: development on windows

/server/ Paul Scott ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Re: unexpected \unfoldRepeats behavior

and dynamics costs a lot of input time and makes it a lot harder to make sure I haven't dropped a bar somewhere. Paul Scott ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Re: lilypond 2.13.1 up

Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: Please try 2.13.1-2 to see if this helps. No error message and the PDF is fine now. Thanks, Paul With 2.13.1 on Debian sid I get: Converting to `./asthedeertenor.pdf'... `gs -q -dSAFER -dDEVICEWIDTHPOINTS=612.00 -dDEVICEHEIGHTPOINTS=792.00

Re: lilypond 2.13.1 up

on Debian sid I get: Converting to `./asthedeertenor.pdf'... `gs -q -dSAFER -dDEVICEWIDTHPOINTS=612.00 -dDEVICEHEIGHTPOINTS=792.00 -dCompatibilityLevel=1.4 -dNOPAUSE -dBATCH -r1200 -sDEVICE=pdfwrite -sOutputFile=./asthedeertenor.pdf -c .setpdfwrite -f asthedeertenor.ps' failed (256) Paul Scott

Re: lilypond 2.13.1 up

on Debian sid I get: Converting to `./asthedeertenor.pdf'... `gs -q -dSAFER -dDEVICEWIDTHPOINTS=612.00 -dDEVICEHEIGHTPOINTS=792.00 -dCompatibilityLevel=1.4 -dNOPAUSE -dBATCH -r1200 -sDEVICE=pdfwrite -sOutputFile=./asthedeertenor.pdf -c .setpdfwrite -f asthedeertenor.ps' failed (256) Paul Scott

Re: Concert Pitch (a second try)

Carl D. Sorensen wrote: I'm going to step in here, perhaps where wise men fear to tread. The LilyPond music glossary isn't intended to be a definitive music dictionary, is it? Nope. A basic understanding of transposition should be all that is important here. So do we care what

Re: Music Glossary - 1.64 Concert Pitch (2.12.2)

for the purposes of this discussion. From one point of view you would call a bassoon an F instrument, a normal clarinet (Bf) an Eb instrument (equivalent to an F recorder). Paul Scott ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http

Re: Music Glossary - 1.64 Concert Pitch (2.12.2)

On Apr 3, 2009, at 3:49 PM, Anthony W. Youngman wrote: In message 7ca3d5a30904031519ya3b89hb87cf8f81a544...@mail.gmail.com, Neil Puttock n.putt...@gmail.com writes 2009/4/3 Anthony W. Youngman lilyp...@thewolery.demon.co.uk: In message mj9t1jgcvk1jf...@thewolery.demon.co.uk, Anthony W.

CSS style for code

for code tags which slightly increased the font size. I see this with Firefox 3 and the latest Debian version of SeaMonkey. Thanks for reading this, Paul Scott ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman

Re: CSS style for code

Patrick McCarty wrote: Hi Paul, On Fri, Feb 06, 2009 at 12:14:27PM -0700, Paul Scott wrote: I haven't complimented our fantastic documentation lately. It is truely amazing!! Thanks! Is it true for anyone else that the effective font for all the HTML enclosed in code tags

Re: CSS style for code

Resent from subscribed address. Patrick McCarty wrote: Hi Paul, On Fri, Feb 06, 2009 at 12:14:27PM -0700, Paul Scott wrote: I haven't complimented our fantastic documentation lately. It is truely amazing!! Thanks! Is it true for anyone else that the effective font for all

Re: Directory name of aux is invalid

separate entities part. Paul Scott ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Re: shorthand for autoBeam control

Werner LEMBERG wrote: My special example is this where such a shorthand would be quite convenient: c4 c c \times 2/3 { r8 c16 } c8 This may have nothing to do with your proposal/question but as a reader I would find your example much harder to read/sightread than c4 c c

Re: shorthand for autoBeam control

/sightread than c4 c c \times 2/3 { r8[ c16] } c8 or c4 c c \times 2/3 { r8[ c16 } c8] Paul Scott (see attached image). Werner

Re: Fwd: [PATCH] Re: Octavation syntax consistency

Reinhold Kainhofer wrote: Hello Han-Wen, Do you have any opinion about this patch (adds \ottava #x, which is supposed to make #(set-octavation x) obsolete)? Okay to apply to master? Shouldn't that really be \octave #x since other commands are in English? Paul Scott Cheers, Reinhold

Re: GDP: LM 1.2 About the docs

Graham Percival wrote: On Wed, 23 Jul 2008 10:16:37 -0700 Paul Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Magnificent! Trivial word: s/operating/operation/ Thanks. BTW, the actual syntax is s/before/after/, but I got the meaning. :) Doh! I really did know that working with early

Re: Fwd: [PATCH] Re: Octavation syntax consistency

Reinhold Kainhofer wrote: Hello Han-Wen, Do you have any opinion about this patch (adds \ottava #x, which is supposed to make #(set-octavation x) obsolete)? Okay to apply to master? Shouldn't that really be \octave #x since other commands are in English? Paul Scott Cheers, Reinhold

Re: GDP: LM 1.2 About the docs

programs and operating system-specific issues. Paul Scott ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Re: 2.11.50 broken on PPC (and/or Windows?)

by testing it further? I get 217 Bus error on PPC (Tiger). This may show up twice since I first sent it from an unsubscribed address. Paul Scott ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond

Re: building sections of the docs

Graham Percival wrote: On Sun, 06 Jan 2008 22:08:14 -0700 Paul Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Something is still missing or misconfigured. See below. Did you compile the lilypond *binary* yourself, or did you download a binary? (ie GUB) Have not compiled recently. GUBs have

Re: Leaving: replacements

Graham Percival wrote: On Tue, 01 Jan 2008 12:48:35 -0700 Paul Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Graham Percival wrote: An previously announced, am I gradually leaving LilyPond. This leaves a large number of tasks unfilled.ate lilypond knowledge) I would consider the job

Re: Leaving: replacements

Graham Percival wrote: On Sun, 06 Jan 2008 00:49:00 -0700 Paul Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Graham Percival wrote: If you want to jump into the technical side of things, see advanced-tech.txt (or perhaps you have already done this). To get an introduction to the non-technical side

building sections of the docs

Hi Graham or anyone who knows, Can I build just pitches.itely portion of the doc's? If so how? TIA, Paul Scott ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Re: building sections of the docs

John Mandereau wrote: Le dimanche 06 janvier 2008 à 03:06 -0700, Paul Scott a écrit : Hi Graham or anyone who knows, Can I build just pitches.itely portion of the doc's? If so how? No, but you can build/clean only stuff in Documentation/user (or any directory with docs

Re: building sections of the docs

Graham Percival wrote: On Sun, 06 Jan 2008 12:17:31 -0700 Paul Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: John Mandereau wrote: Can I build just pitches.itely portion of the doc's? If so how? No, but you can build/clean only stuff in Documentation/user (or any directory with docs

Re: building sections of the docs

Unfortunately it's easy to accidentally send these from an unsubscribed address. Graham Percival wrote: On Sun, 06 Jan 2008 17:14:24 -0700 Paul Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm following instructions at: http://web.uvic.ca/~gperciva/advanced-tech.txt I'm trying to build to see

Re: building sections of the docs

Graham Percival wrote: On Sun, 06 Jan 2008 21:11:25 -0700 Paul Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Application Usage and have found 1.2.4. :) What does the following mean? You may build the manual ( Documentation/user/ ) without building all the input/* stuff. I have now followed

Re: MultiMeasureRest vs. MeasureRest

while the second fairly clearly means one measure rest. MeasuresRest might work. Paul Scott ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Re: \times vs. \tuplet

. Will convert-ly force the change of \times to \tuplet? Will the fractional numbers be inverted? Paul Scott ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Re: MultiMeasureRest vs. MeasureRest

Rune Zedeler [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Paul Scott skrev: What about renaming MultiMeasureRest to MeasureRest? In English the first has the clear meaning of more than one measure while the second fairly clearly means one measure rest. ___ lilypond-devel

Re: \times vs. \tuplet

Paco Vila wrote: El Sat, 08 de Dec de 2007, a las 06:52:18PM +0100, John Mandereau dijo: I second this; there has been a huge thread on lilypond-user, and besides all different wishes that can hardly be satisified, I seem to remember there was some general consensus about changing \times to

Re: \times vs. \tuplet

Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: Paul Scott escreveu: Would it be unreasonable to simply add \tuplet as code/macro that would call or use \times? That way those of us who are not confused by \times can use it and those who prefer \tuplet can use that. That would not work; functions cannot

Re: \times vs. \tuplet

Graham Percival wrote: On Sun, 09 Dec 2007 18:07:45 -0700 Paul Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Paco Vila wrote: if times can be read as multiplied by this is no longer true with tuplet. I believe that was discussed which is why I asked my question. The more

Re: \times vs. \tuplet

Graham Percival wrote: On Sun, 09 Dec 2007 18:57:17 -0700 Paul Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Graham Percival wrote: The more complicated this change is, the more years it will take before it is done. With that in consideration, I believe that simply replacing \times

Re: 2.11.35 does not run

Paco Vila wrote: GNU LilyPond 2.11.35 ERROR: In procedure primitive-load-path: ERROR: Unable to find file ice-9/boot-9.scm in load path I promise further testing. switching back to .De34 works fine. Works fine on my Debian sid system. Paul

page breaks related to header size

for several hours reducing my real example to the following. If a simpler example is needed I will see what I can do. Thanks, Paul Scott \version 2.11.34 \include english.ly #(set-default-paper-size letter) #(set-global-staff-size 20.8) \paper{ paper-size = letter ragged-bottom = ##t ragged

Re: page breaks related to header size

Michael David Crawford wrote: Paul Scott wrote: 2.11.34 In this example there is clearly room for another system on the first page. Removing anything from the header will allow another system to move to the first page. Whatever is removed from the header clearly doesn't take as much

Re: input/tolsr/

that either of those will happen. I agree that it makes life a bit harder for Trevor and the like... but I think we only have a dozen serious users who track unstable. *hand* Paul Scott -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http

Re: About the possibility of including automatic transcription into lilypond

you mean by partitures, though. A partitura is a score. Paul Scott ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Re: `R4*5*4' syntax not documented

Werner LEMBERG wrote: The very important syntax R4*5*4 (indicating a whole measure rest with the length of 5 quarters which is repeated 4 times) is not documented at all... That's what I use for a rest of 4 measures of 5/4. Paul Scott

Re: `R4*5*4' syntax not documented

Werner LEMBERG wrote: The very important syntax R4*5*4 (indicating a whole measure rest with the length of 5 quarters which is repeated 4 times) is not documented at all... Please ignore my answer. I somehow missed the repeated 4 times part. Paul

Re: volta questions

J.P. Mellor wrote: Paul == Paul Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Paul J.P. Mellor wrote: I know there's some question about exactly when the vertical bar on the right side of a (final) volta bracket should be printed. Here's a patch which produces the behavior I

Re: volta questions

and there is usually not a vertical line there. Have fun, Paul Scott ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Re: volta questions

J.P. Mellor wrote: I know there's some question about exactly when the vertical bar on the right side of a (final) volta bracket should be printed. Here's a patch which produces the behavior I suggested -- print it unless the bracket is broken or shortened. What do you mean by shortened? I

Re: volta questions

J.P. Mellor wrote: I have a few questions about voltas/alternatives. 1) Under some conditions the volta bracket is not printed completely. Manually using ||: or :|| will solve some of this. Paul Scott ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond

\mark \default in 2.9.24

. MarkEvent) (types general-music mark-event event)) #Prob: Music C++: Music((origin . #location nmark.ly:4:8))((display-methods #procedure #f (mark)) (name . MarkEvent) (types general-music mark-event event)) I'll send this to the bug list if I haven't missed something in the latest manual. Paul

2.9.21 location

2.9.21 is not linked from the website yet. Can someone remind me where I can get it and other versions? Thanks, Paul Scott ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Re: invisible time signature example unclear (hymnody request)

someone clarify how to do invisible time signature changes? Failing that, can we have a grace measure, similar to how we have grace notes? Ted If I understand you correctly that's what \partial is for (pickups). \partial s8*3 a8 b c %for three eight note pickups. Paul Scott

Re: changing the midi instrument; broken

the file that specifies the part or score. Paul Scott ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Re: changing the midi instrument; broken

redundancy in download and libraries with what's already on you machine. Paul Scott ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Re: Changing bar number alignment to left?

. Paul Scott ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Re: using new fall and doit features in 2.9.13

John Mandereau wrote: Paul Scott wrote: Can someone tell me how to use the new fall and doit features. I guessed incorrectly \fall and \doit. Just like any new feature, go to the NEWS page in documentation and click the image. Thanks. I did go to the news page and even though I

using new fall and doit features in 2.9.13

Can someone tell me how to use the new fall and doit features. I guessed incorrectly \fall and \doit. TIA, Paul Scott ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Re: Problem with \partial

Anthony Youngman wrote: Well, there's English, and there's English. I've come across the term anacrusis and would never have thought of calling it a pickup. lead in or upbeat are the terms I mostly hear people use, I think. Obviously there are regional differences. Pickup which can be plural

Re: Problem with \partial

as it is. In my experience upbeat is the second half of a beat where downbeat is the first half of a beat. If it needs to be changed pickup(s) at least means what you seem to be referring to. Paul Scott ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel

automatic page breaks changed for 2.9.8?

but if there is not a way for a choice I think there should be. 2.8.4 does the more normal page breaking. I can produce my example if necessary. Paul Scott ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Re: automatic page breaks changed for 2.9.8?

Kieren MacMillan wrote: Hi, Paul: if there is not a way for a choice I think there should be. \score { \layout { breakbefore = ##t } } and \score { \layout { breakbefore = ##f } } I do use breakbefore = ##t when I want a break. Does this mean that

Re: automatic page breaks changed for 2.9.8?

Joe Neeman wrote: On Thu, 2006-06-08 at 17:17 -0700, Paul Scott wrote: A part produced with: \book { \score { } \score { } } Using 2.9.8 seems to force a page break at the end of a movement (\score) whether there is room for part of the next movement or not. That is unless

Re: addition to documentation - ghost notes for drums/percussion

) And for wind instruments. A fairly common articulation in jazz. On saxophone the note is fingered and given almost no air - almost swallowed. Hence ghost note. Now that I have seen it I will probably add a \ghost definition to my common.ly file. Paul Scott

Re: \displayMusic should begin with a newline

their use this week in a WXP class. Paul Scott ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Re: \displayMusic should begin with a newline

Johannes Schindelin wrote: Hi, On Thu, 11 May 2006, Paul Scott wrote: Graham Percival wrote: But IIRC windows doesn't support pipes -- Sure it does. The original DOS came from some version of Unix. Redirection and pipes have always been there. I just taught their use

Re: C++ vs. Scheme

as fast as C++. Some fully compiled language is needed for speed for the heavy internal calculations. I doesn't have to be C++ but Han-Wen is not going to rewrite the C++ at this point. Check the archive for these discussions. Paul Scott

Re: LIlypond 2.8 on K6 or K6-II?

Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: Han-Wen Nienhuys writes: I'm compiling GMP with -march=i386 (Why) only GMP? Good question! That's the only place I've seen the illegal instruction but of course GMP (libgmp?) might be the fuse that's protecting the next illegal instruction in some

Re: LIlypond 2.8 on K6 or K6-II?

Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: Paul Scott wrote: Good question! That's the only place I've seen the illegal instruction but of course GMP (libgmp?) might be the fuse that's protecting the next illegal instruction in some other module. can you check 2.7.39-2 ? A quick test ran fine! What did

Re: default behavior for multiple \header{}s

) Is this intentional or a bug? But as the manual says in the very next section: normally only the |piece| and |opus| headers will be printed which probably should read overwritten. Paul Scott ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http

Development branch doesn't run on K6-II

/bin/../lib/libgmp.so.3 Paul Scott ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Re: Development branch doesn't run on K6-II

Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: Paul Scott wrote: Was this received or has anything new happened. I have several machines I was running Lily on and now can't. Thanks, Paul On Debian sid on a K6-II I get: GNU LilyPond 2.7.37 Program received signal SIGILL, Illegal instruction. 0xb7e25423

Development branch doesn't run on K6-II

On Debian sid on a K6-II I get: GNU LilyPond 2.7.37 Program received signal SIGILL, Illegal instruction. 0xb7e25423 in __gmpn_mod_1 () from /usr/local/lilypond/usr/bin/../lib/libgmp.so.3 Paul Scott ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel

make all ChangeLog 1.4688 fails

]: *** No rule to make target `out/PFAemmentaler-11.pfa', needed by `default'. Stop. make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/paul/lilypond/mf' make: *** [all] Error 2 Paul Scott ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman

latest make all fails

Compiling fdl.texi... Writing `fdl.texi'... lilypond-book.py: warning: option --psfonts not used lilypond-book.py: warning: processing with dvips will have no fonts DVIPS usage: dvips -h ./out/lilypond.psfonts ./out/lilypond.dvi mv -f ./out/lilypond.texinfo out/lilypond.nexi 2/dev/null || mv

Re: latest make all fails

Graham Percival wrote: On 19-Feb-06, at 12:46 PM, Paul Scott wrote: /home/paul/lilypond/Documentation/user/out//instrument-notation.texi: 1265: Misplaced {. /home/paul/lilypond/Documentation/user/out//instrument-notation.texi: 1266: Misplaced {. Fixed in CVS, thanks. Thanks, the latest

Re: 'make all' fails CVS 1.4637

David Bobroff wrote: Current CVS (ChangeLog 1.4637) barfs fairly far into the build process: The very latest (don't know ChangeLog version) builds for me on Debian sid. Paul ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org

Re: 'make all' fails CVS 1.4637

. Paul Scott ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Re: 'make all' fails CVS 1.4637

David Bobroff wrote: On Sat, 2006-02-18 at 07:52 -0700, Paul Scott wrote: David Bobroff wrote: Current CVS (ChangeLog 1.4637) barfs fairly far into the build process: 1. Where do you find the ChangeLog version number? What I normally do is check here: http

current CVS fails on Debian sid

(const char*)': relocate.cc:292: error: invalid conversion from 'const char**' to 'char**' make[1]: *** [out/relocate.o] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/paul/lilypond/lily' make: *** [all] Error 2 Paul Scott ___ lilypond-devel mailing list

Re: circling marks

Erlend Aasland wrote: On 2/16/06, *Paul Scott* [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Erlend Aasland wrote: I have not seen page numbers in the manual. Can you tell me where to see them? Yes, the right upper corner of each page (I assume you've downloaded the manual

bar numbers right aligned (default) on wrong bar?

In 2.7.34 the bar numbers appear to be right aligned on the previous bar. Paul Scott \version 2.7.34 \relative c '' { \time 4/4 \override Score.BarNumber #'break-visibility = #end-of-line-invisible \set Score.barNumberVisibility = #(every-nth-bar-number-visible 1) \override

Re: current CVS fails on Debian sid

Erlend Aasland wrote: This is already fixed in CVS. Just do a CVS update. I now get a different error. This is what 'make install' gives after getting an error in 'make all' which I wasn't sure was a problem: Processing `/home/paul/lilypond/ly/generate-documentation.ly'

Re: circling marks

Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: Graham Percival wrote: On 6-Feb-06, at 1:04 AM, Erlend Aasland wrote: You can use this patch (touching scm/translation-functions.scm) in order to get format-mark-circle functions. Perhaps this patch should be applied in order to make it easier to use this kind of

Re: circling marks

Erlend Aasland wrote: ... and by the way, this is documented on page 190 and 191 in the fine manual. I have not seen page numbers in the manual. Can you tell me where to see them? In section 8.2.3 Rehearsal Marks I don't see enough explanation to learn what you have just shown me. Paul

Re: circling marks

Graham Percival wrote: On 16-Feb-06, at 2:44 AM, Paul Scott wrote: Erlend Aasland wrote: ... and by the way, this is documented on page 190 and 191 in the fine manual. I have not seen page numbers in the manual. Can you tell me where to see them? They exist in the pdf version

Re: circling marks

Graham Percival wrote: On 6-Feb-06, at 1:04 AM, Erlend Aasland wrote: You can use this patch (touching scm/translation-functions.scm) in order to get format-mark-circle functions. Perhaps this patch should be applied in order to make it easier to use this kind of rehearsal marks? I

error in CVS version of 2006-02-06

', needed by `out/file-name.o'. Stop. make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/paul/lilypond/flower' make: *** [all] Error 2 Paul Scott ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Re: error in CVS version of 2006-02-06

Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: Paul Scott writes: make[1]: *** No rule to make target `include/array.hh', needed by out/file-name.o'. Stop. That's a stale dependency, our build system cannot handle removed files (as most build systems cannot). I don't know enough about what that means

  1   2   >