On 7 sept. 2014, at 09:20, d...@gnu.org wrote:
I don't like it. The maximum range of a variable is an arbitrary value
and this loop avoidance will not do us much good on a 64-bit
architecture.
If this is a real concern, we should be either using a tortoise/hare
algorithm here in order to
Sent from my iPhone
On 30 août 2014, at 18:54, Jürgen Reuter reute...@web.de wrote:
Hi all,
there is a bug in Lookup::bezier_sandwich that severely affects ancient
notation. This method was originally added to lookup.cc for
flexa/porrectus support.
In version 2.14, the
Sent from my iPhone
On 24 août 2013, at 12:47, pkx1...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2013/08/24 08:25:14, dak wrote:
On 2013/08/24 08:05:13, mike7 wrote:
On 24 août 2013, at 10:18, mailto:lemzw...@googlemail.com wrote:
LGTM, except of using `surrogate' in the name. Given that the
stencil
Hey all,
Just a quick note to say that I'm eye-deep in work but I'm reading the LilyPond
list every other day. I don't want anything related to my work to get bogged
down by my absence. If you have specific questions about how something works
(or doesn't), don't hesitate to send me an e-mail
On 24 avr. 2013, at 01:06, k-ohara5...@oco.net wrote:
lgtm
Somewhere I'll have to write down the definition
cross-staff: true for a grob whose placement or size could depend on
the spacing of staves on the page.
It's not quite that. In the definition above, a treble clef on the 5th staff
On 20 avr. 2013, at 08:06, k-ohara5...@oco.net wrote:
https://codereview.appspot.com/8819043/diff/5001/lily/line-spanner.cc
File lily/line-spanner.cc (right):
https://codereview.appspot.com/8819043/diff/5001/lily/line-spanner.cc#newcode371
lily/line-spanner.cc:371: // actual stencil
Current master off of lilydev
Sent from my iPhone
On 19 avr. 2013, at 19:55, lilyp...@googlecode.com wrote:
Comment #3 on issue 3325 by k-ohara5...@oco.net: Stems should not pass
between the letters of a word
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3325
I need to match your
On 18 avr. 2013, at 10:51, k-ohara5...@oco.net wrote:
I suggest that you set the defaults consistently for all text grobs, so
that I don't have to file bug reports one-at-a-time for every possible
case:
\paper { indent = 0\mm
line-width = 42.2\mm
ragged-right = ##f }
\score { \new Staff
On 16 avr. 2013, at 12:59, d...@gnu.org wrote:
On 2013/04/16 08:34:43, MikeSol wrote:
On 2013/04/16 07:51:46, dak wrote:
I hate it when I get last-minute realizations. Here is another
thing we need to do for the stable release: go through all
problems of the too snug kind and work out
On 16 avr. 2013, at 22:12, d...@gnu.org wrote:
On 2013/04/16 11:11:03, janek wrote:
2013/4/16 d...@gnu.org:
I hate it when I get last-minute realizations. Here is another
thing we
need to do for the stable release: go through all problems of the
too
snug kind and work out defaults
On 15 avr. 2013, at 15:38, d...@gnu.org wrote:
https://codereview.appspot.com/1425041/diff/12001/ps/music-drawing-routines.ps
File ps/music-drawing-routines.ps (right):
https://codereview.appspot.com/1425041/diff/12001/ps/music-drawing-routines.ps#newcode196
On 12 avr. 2013, at 22:29, k-ohara5...@oco.net wrote:
https://codereview.appspot.com/7310075/diff/67001/lily/skyline.cc
File lily/skyline.cc (right):
https://codereview.appspot.com/7310075/diff/67001/lily/skyline.cc#newcode370
lily/skyline.cc:370: if (x1 = last_end)
Oops. This controls
On 10 avr. 2013, at 16:13, Fan Ziye fanzi...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear list,
Hi, I introduced myself to you several weeks ago – a fourth-year
undergraduate student of EECS wanting to be involved in lilypond’s
developing. And then Mike told me to read the CG. (Thank you very much!).
But
On 9 avr. 2013, at 20:31, k-ohara5...@oco.net wrote:
On 2013/03/26 04:10:38, mike7 wrote:
On 25 mars 2013, at 07:10, mailto:k-ohara5...@oco.net wrote:
Please do just one manual review of the regression suite between
versions before adding another test of this length.
I wanted to
On 6 avr. 2013, at 12:07, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
With the recent batch of material with missing documentation, extensive
code changes and new functionality without previous exposure and moving
interfaces (like
commit 88d306d9c5666b5ade4a136df29cca19c5ff5ed7
Author: Mike Solomon
On 3 avr. 2013, at 01:57, d...@gnu.org wrote:
On 2013/04/02 22:34:53, janek wrote:
I'll risk joining the discussion.
I see valid points from both of you. I agree that it's better to fix
a broken
design than to patch it with red tape.
It isn't patched. minimum-length is used in
On 1 avr. 2013, at 14:13, Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 7:52 AM, mts...@gmail.com wrote:
I'd recommend adding a sort of padding property to the
self-alignment-interface to get it completely there.
That is, imagine that we right align to a
On 2 avr. 2013, at 00:51, janek.lilyp...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 1:20 PM, m...@mikesolomon.org
m...@mikesolomon.org wrote:
X-extent is used in many things other than self alignment positioning,
so u don't want to change extents. Every positioning in LilyPond has
some notion
On 30 mars 2013, at 07:08, m...@mikesolomon.org wrote:
On 30 mars 2013, at 06:42, Keith OHara k-ohara5...@oco.net wrote:
Phil Holmes email at philholmes.net writes:
The second is the substantial change in the Les Nereides system
spacing. Deliberate?
The second change is from
On 30 mars 2013, at 08:27, lilyp...@googlecode.com wrote:
Updates:
Labels: -Patch-push
Comment #8 on issue 3256 by d...@gnu.org: Patch: Eliminates side poisition
calculations for system-start-text grobs.
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3256
This patch has
On 30 mars 2013, at 08:33, k-ohara5...@oco.net wrote:
Why not use the flat-line for empty VerticalAxisGroups specifically in
side-position-interface.cc when placing something against the staff (in
the clause if (include_staff) {} ) ?
include_staff is false for VerticalAxisGroups without
On 30 mars 2013, at 10:29, k-ohara5...@oco.net wrote:
Simpler to just reverse the special X-alignment commit.
The old code, that followed the comment about a 'kldge' whatever that
means, was rather elegant. If we are placing something alongside an
empty set, place it against the reference
Hey all,
I reverted the instrument name patch in staging.
Cheers,
MS
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
On 29 mars 2013, at 18:48, Phil Holmes em...@philholmes.net wrote:
I've been comparing the result of my push of my pixel-based regtest
comparator (b4fe233aec83383bd2e6b6170fca67a31a8c492d) with current master
(6e4e69f2735a764eab2e6f70f83546461da0203b). There are 2 changes that concern
me.
On 29 mars 2013, at 20:36, Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 7:04 PM, Phil Holmes em...@philholmes.net wrote:
- Original Message - From: Janek Warchoł
janek.lilyp...@gmail.com
On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 5:48 PM, Phil Holmes em...@philholmes.net
On 2013/03/27 21:50:02, janek wrote:
What was wrong with the skylines
that caused this bug? Maybe this is just one instance of a more
general problem.
The skylines themselves were fine, but objects above a Staff are not
checked for collisions with objects below a Staff.
In the
On 30 mars 2013, at 06:42, Keith OHara k-ohara5...@oco.net wrote:
Phil Holmes email at philholmes.net writes:
The second is the substantial change in the Les Nereides system
spacing. Deliberate?
The second change is from the commit immediately before yours,
Uses special X alignment for
On 23 mars 2013, at 13:59, James pkx1...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
Countdown – March 26th 2013 – 19:00 GMT
3134 Enhancement Mike SolomonPushPatch: Removes the
translate_axis call from axis-group-interface outside-staff positioning.
James
On 26 mars 2013, at 10:52, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Hi,
I met a former colleague in the bus to Chemnitz, and he is at least
knowledgeable about EU research programmes. Do people here have ideas
about possible institutions who could be made to participate? I think
the
There are two critical issues that we're going to have to start seriously
thinking about now if 2.18 is going to happen anytime soon:
https://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2733
I'm not comfortable marking this critical: not because it is not critical for
Laura, nor because it may
On 27 mars 2013, at 07:54, Werner LEMBERG w...@gnu.org wrote:
https://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2656
This is really bad. I agree that it is critical. I unfortunately
have no way to test this, but do people have an ETA for fixing this?
If not, it will hold 2.18 up for
On 25 mars 2013, at 06:42, k-ohara5...@oco.net wrote:
Code looks good, but we could get the same result with
\override Accidental #'horizontal-skylines = #'()
Conceptually, I'm a fan of the snapping idea, but you're right that it takes
more time. Would this \override fix all problems of
On 25 mars 2013, at 07:10, k-ohara5...@oco.net wrote:
Thanks for taking the time to do this. No-one else knows enough of the
various stages of processing to bring all the pieces together.
It looks like you try to use a common UP/DOWN direction for the portions
of a broken slur, and the
On 26 mars 2013, at 05:58, Keith OHara k-ohara5...@oco.net wrote:
On Mon, 25 Mar 2013 00:29:35 -0700, m...@mikesolomon.org
m...@mikesolomon.org wrote:
On 25 mars 2013, at 07:10, k-ohara5...@oco.net wrote:
It looks like you try to use a common UP/DOWN direction for the portions
On 24 mars 2013, at 14:59, d...@gnu.org wrote:
https://codereview.appspot.com/7574048/diff/5001/input/regression/instrument-name-x-align.ly
File input/regression/instrument-name-x-align.ly (right):
Hey all,
I'm getting:
Unhandled exception.
[TransientError]
from git-cl. Any ideas as to what that's all about?
Cheers,
MS
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
On 22 mars 2013, at 18:32, SoundsFromSound soundsfromso...@gmail.com wrote:
Hmm..I kind of like the new behavior too, it's easier on my eyes. I like how
it staggers to flow with the score, but I can see why some would want strict
lined-up fingerings as well.
Just my 2 cents.
Ben
Hey all,
To prepare for 2.18, I think we can get it out fastish, but we need to more or
less freeze current master aside from bug fixes and documentation. I have a
lot of stuff on the countdown or on patch push that I'm not gonna push for a
few months until we get 2.18 out (Ferneyhough
On 20 mars 2013, at 07:25, Werner LEMBERG w...@gnu.org wrote:
I can even imagine to use to commands, \start and \end to get, say,
`\start(' or `\end\'. Who knows, maybe this destinction is
advantageous sometime in the future.
Maybe even better \startOf and \endOf.
Werner
The
On 20 mars 2013, at 07:50, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
m...@mikesolomon.org m...@mikesolomon.org writes:
On 20 mars 2013, at 06:07, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
m...@mikesolomon.org m...@mikesolomon.org writes:
Trying to put myself in the shoes of the average user, \fake
On 20 mars 2013, at 14:52, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
m...@mikesolomon.org m...@mikesolomon.org writes:
On 20 mars 2013, at 14:26, d...@gnu.org wrote:
Yet another possibility would be \inner but that implies a hierarchy.
More accurate would be \continued.
https
On 20 mars 2013, at 14:26, d...@gnu.org wrote:
Yet another possibility would be \inner but that implies a hierarchy.
More accurate would be \continued.
https://codereview.appspot.com/7424049/
I like \interrupted
Cheers,
MS
___
lilypond-devel
Sent from my iPhone
On 20 mars 2013, at 16:38, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Werner LEMBERG w...@gnu.org writes:
I think any further proposals should _definitely_ explain how to write
the given example
g f e d(
\repeat { c d) e f ( }
\alternatives {
{ g) a b( a \fake) }
{
On 20 mars 2013, at 18:25, m...@mikesolomon.org m...@mikesolomon.org wrote:
Sent from my iPhone
On 20 mars 2013, at 16:38, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Werner LEMBERG w...@gnu.org writes:
I think any further proposals should _definitely_ explain how to write
the given example
g
On 20 mars 2013, at 09:26, Trevor Daniels t.dani...@treda.co.uk wrote:
m...@mikesolomon.org
I completely agree. It's just that fake in English means false or
counterfeit. It needs another word, just don't know what yet. unchained?
free?
At the risk of prolonging the bike-shedding
On 19 mars 2013, at 12:49, janek.lilyp...@gmail.com wrote:
Mike,
i've read the patch 3 times and i don't understand how it solves the
problem.
I see that you remove some weird c++ code, but why can you do this?
Also, why marking some grobs as cross-staff helps with solving issue
3242,
On 19 mars 2013, at 22:26, d...@gnu.org wrote:
On 2013/03/19 15:22:41, MikeSol wrote:
Two backslashes
After some consideration, I consider the name \broken suboptimal since
it implies two pieces. Two other possibilities would be \detached and
\fake.
On 19 mars 2013, at 22:04, janek.lilyp...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Mike all,
On 2013/03/19 15:21:37, MikeSol wrote:
I like where you're going with this.
cool! :)
I would recommend creating a function algined_on_grobs that accepts a
grob, an
vector of grobs to align to, and an axis. Then
On 19 mars 2013, at 23:37, Werner LEMBERG w...@gnu.org wrote:
After some consideration, I consider the name \broken suboptimal since
it implies two pieces. Two other possibilities would be \detached and
\fake.
I vote for detached.
I vote for \broken. For me, it doesn't imply two
On 20 mars 2013, at 03:24, d...@gnu.org wrote:
On 2013/03/19 22:37:14, wl_gnu.org wrote:
After some consideration, I consider the name \broken suboptimal
since
it implies two pieces. Two other possibilities would be \detached
and
\fake.
I vote for detached.
I vote for \broken.
On 20 mars 2013, at 00:27, Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 11:40 PM, m...@mikesolomon.org
m...@mikesolomon.org wrote:
The main reason that I suggest this is that exceptions in the code base lead
to harder maintenance.
I am guilty of adding some
On 20 mars 2013, at 06:07, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
m...@mikesolomon.org m...@mikesolomon.org writes:
Trying to put myself in the shoes of the average user, \fake would not
mean a function that uses a fake post event, but rather a function
that produces a \fake something. I would
On 17 mars 2013, at 10:19, d...@gnu.org wrote:
You don't fix your own work after it has been committed,
This is patently false. Please do not write e-mails like this to a public list
that can be read by future employers of mine that want to evaluate my integrity.
so why would
you fix
On 17 mars 2013, at 11:05, Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 12:20 PM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Do we
really need a particular associated voice instead of being able to do
this with general music column alignment?
I'll write a full answer
On 17 mars 2013, at 12:29, Neil Puttock n.putt...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mar 17, 2013 11:10 AM, m...@mikesolomon.org m...@mikesolomon.org wrote:
In the stop_translation_timestep method of the lyric engraver, lyrics are
given note heads as parents. Could you send a minimal where the lyrics
On 17 mars 2013, at 13:36, thomasmorle...@googlemail.com wrote:
On 2013/03/17 07:27:37, MikeSol wrote:
On 2013/03/13 21:38:59, thomasmorley65 wrote:
https://codereview.appspot.com/7615043/diff/23001/scm/output-lib.scm
File scm/output-lib.scm (right):
On 17 mars 2013, at 17:22, m...@hohlart.de wrote:
Just one nitpick.
https://codereview.appspot.com/7497046/diff/1/scm/stencil.scm
File scm/stencil.scm (right):
https://codereview.appspot.com/7497046/diff/1/scm/stencil.scm#newcode251
scm/stencil.scm:251: Makes a list of angle/radius
On 17 mars 2013, at 17:25, joseph.wakel...@gmail.com wrote:
Final remark: while it's nice to see Ferneyhough getting namechecked
might it be worth naming this alteration as flared-hairpin rather than
ferneyhough-hairpin?
My suggestion was flairpin, which is infinitely cheesier and thus
On 17 mars 2013, at 17:46, joseph.wakel...@gmail.com wrote:
On a related issue: one thing that's probably clear looking at
Ferneyhough scores is the way in which the vertical placement of hairpin
endpoints is strongly coupled with the vertical placement of dynamic
marks.
I don't think
On 16 mars 2013, at 04:26, k-ohara5...@oco.net wrote:
good enough
https://codereview.appspot.com/7516048/diff/1/scm/define-grobs.scm
File scm/define-grobs.scm (right):
https://codereview.appspot.com/7516048/diff/1/scm/define-grobs.scm#newcode312
scm/define-grobs.scm:312:
On 16 mars 2013, at 17:17, Kieren MacMillan kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca
wrote:
Hello all,
My two-act musical, Robin Hood: The Legendary Musical Comedy, had a
three-week run at Toronto's Hart House Theatre in January. It was quite
successful, to the point that several parties have
On 14 mars 2013, at 06:44, m...@mikesolomon.org wrote:
On 14 mars 2013, at 06:42, k-ohara5...@oco.net wrote:
issue 3242
https://codereview.appspot.com/6827072/diff/38003/lily/axis-group-interface.cc
File lily/axis-group-interface.cc (right):
https://codereview.appspot.com/6827072
On 14 mars 2013, at 08:05, k-ohara5...@oco.net wrote:
So then the convention for an extent is
'(+inf.0 . -inf.0) is empty, but for skylines in the cross direction it
is an infinite wall;
'(0 . 0) is a point, but ignored for skylines;
'(-inf.0 . +inf.0) is an infinite wall all the time.
On 13 mars 2013, at 00:02, janek.lilyp...@gmail.com wrote:
Nice hairpins!
Janek
https://codereview.appspot.com/7615043/diff/23001/input/regression/ferneyhough-hairpins.ly
File input/regression/ferneyhough-hairpins.ly (right):
On 12 mars 2013, at 23:44, janek.lilyp...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Mike,
i've read changes in code and i don't quite get what this change is for.
What makes it possible that we can now accept boxes that are narrower
than epsilon? What can we achieve with that and why?
I'm sorry for asking
Hey all,
I'm not too good at writing convert-ly rules. Is there a model I can use for
replacing a property with another? Specifically, I'd like to write a patch
changing:
TupletBracket.staff-padding
to:
TupletBracket.bracket-staff-padding
as one cannot currently use the side position
On 13 mars 2013, at 10:51, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
m...@mikesolomon.org m...@mikesolomon.org writes:
Hey all,
I'm not too good at writing convert-ly rules. Is there a model I can
use for replacing a property with another? Specifically, I'd like to
write a patch changing
On 13 mars 2013, at 11:00, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
m...@mikesolomon.org m...@mikesolomon.org writes:
Hey all,
I'm not too good at writing convert-ly rules. Is there a model I can
use for replacing a property with another? Specifically, I'd like to
write a patch changing
On 13 mars 2013, at 11:56, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
m...@mikesolomon.org m...@mikesolomon.org writes:
On 13 mars 2013, at 11:00, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
It might also be possible to let a callback check for the existing
grob interfaces in possible cases of contention
On 14 mars 2013, at 06:42, k-ohara5...@oco.net wrote:
issue 3242
https://codereview.appspot.com/6827072/diff/38003/lily/axis-group-interface.cc
File lily/axis-group-interface.cc (right):
https://codereview.appspot.com/6827072/diff/38003/lily/axis-group-interface.cc#newcode902
On 10 mars 2013, at 22:30, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Werner LEMBERG w...@gnu.org writes:
So, to resume, I agree that a freeze is important. When the freeze
kicks in, I'd rather that we say something like no new big projects
starting on date X will be part of 2.18 so that developers
On 11 mars 2013, at 16:32, Trevor Daniels t.dani...@treda.co.uk wrote:
David Kastrup wrote Sunday, March 10, 2013 5:32 PM
2.16 is growing old.
So I want to see 2.18 soon. That means we need to stabilize work that
has already been done and cut down on experiments in the master branch.
On 12 mars 2013, at 00:38, thomasmorle...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi Mike,
sorry to have some more nit-picks.
https://codereview.appspot.com/7615043/diff/15001/scm/output-lib.scm
File scm/output-lib.scm (right):
On 10 mars 2013, at 18:32, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Ok folks, it is this time of the year again: I am trying to make myself
unpopular.
There's a time of the year for that?
It also means that commits of the this really does nothing, but it
prepares the ground for $xxx, and I don't
On 9 mars 2013, at 09:51, d...@gnu.org wrote:
On 2013/03/09 07:18:50, mike7 wrote:
On 8 mars 2013, at 14:10, mailto:d...@gnu.org wrote:
https://codereview.appspot.com/7453046/diff/1/input/regression/minimum-length-end-line.ly
File input/regression/minimum-length-end-line.ly (right):
On 10 mars 2013, at 01:47, thomasmorle...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi Mike,
decrescendo doesn't work!!
Yikes! Will fix. Thanks for spotting this.
My idea about drag-hairpin seems not too hard to implement, ofcourse
there would be need to do a clean definition of the property, currently
On 9 mars 2013, at 00:15, thomasmorle...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi Mike,
one thought.
The image Trevor Bača posted
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2013-03/pngIGBdggySyh.png
shows that the left ends of a decrecsendo-hairpin are vertical aligned
even if the hairpin isn't
On 8 mars 2013, at 14:10, d...@gnu.org wrote:
https://codereview.appspot.com/7453046/diff/1/input/regression/minimum-length-end-line.ly
File input/regression/minimum-length-end-line.ly (right):
On 6 mars 2013, at 10:13, d...@gnu.org wrote:
It's a mystery to me how anybody could interpret this text in any other
manner, but there is no point in being less clear than possible, so
LGTM.
https://codereview.appspot.com/7498045/
A handler handles things, i.e. is the person who
On 1 mars 2013, at 22:33, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Phil Holmes em...@philholmes.net writes:
There's lots of improvements that could be made: parallelism, using
something other than diff, but it basically works.
Thoughts?
CMP(1) User Commands
On 2 mars 2013, at 10:16, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
James pkx1...@gmail.com writes:
From: James pkx1...@gmail.com
Subject: Cannot Merge Staging this mornining
Newsgroups: gmane.comp.gnu.lilypond.devel
To: Devel lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Date: Sat, 2 Mar 2013 09:02:37 + (4
On 2 mars 2013, at 10:28, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
m...@mikesolomon.org m...@mikesolomon.org writes:
On 2 mars 2013, at 10:16, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
James pkx1...@gmail.com writes:
From: James pkx1...@gmail.com
Subject: Cannot Merge Staging this mornining
Thanks for the review!
Cheers,
MS
Thanks for the rebase!
https://codereview.appspot.com/7437048/diff/1/lily/slur-engraver.cc
File lily/slur-engraver.cc (right):
https://codereview.appspot.com/7437048/diff/1/lily/slur-engraver.cc#newcode51
lily/slur-engraver.cc:51: event_name_ =
On 1 mars 2013, at 17:30, d...@gnu.org wrote:
On 2013/03/01 14:45:27, mike7 wrote:
doubleSlurs is not generic but rather specific. I'd use something
like
if (double_property_name_ to_boolean (get_property
(double_property_name_)))
instead, then we can, if desired, have a separate
On 1 mars 2013, at 20:15, Phil Holmes em...@philholmes.net wrote:
4 files attached. To try this out: create a new directory and place
NoTagline.ly in it. Create a subdirectory called input and put some regtest
files in there. Run MakeOldPix.sh. Make a change to lilypond. Run
On 28 févr. 2013, at 06:48, d...@gnu.org wrote:
On 2013/02/27 23:00:48, mike7 wrote:
On 27 févr. 2013, at 19:06, mailto:d...@gnu.org wrote:
https://codereview.appspot.com/7377046/diff/17001/input/regression/scheme-text-spanner.ly
File input/regression/scheme-text-spanner.ly (right):
On 28 févr. 2013, at 12:16, Werner LEMBERG w...@gnu.org wrote:
I think that at the current point of time, we should try getting
along with a flat namespace approach. That might imply renaming
properties like padding to side-padding if we can't achieve
reasonable results otherwise. Not
On 28 févr. 2013, at 12:40, Werner LEMBERG w...@gnu.org wrote:
Renaming properties which do something differently is the way to go
IMHO.
Then the first step is finding all properties that are defined in
multiple interfaces and changing their names.
Maybe a naïve question: Are there
On 28 févr. 2013, at 12:47, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
m...@mikesolomon.org m...@mikesolomon.org writes:
On 28 févr. 2013, at 12:40, Werner LEMBERG w...@gnu.org wrote:
Renaming properties which do something differently is the way to go
IMHO.
Then the first step is finding all
On 28 févr. 2013, at 21:30, n.putt...@gmail.com wrote:
https://codereview.appspot.com/7424049/diff/1/input/regression/repeat-slur.ly
File input/regression/repeat-slur.ly (right):
https://codereview.appspot.com/7424049/diff/1/input/regression/repeat-slur.ly#newcode14
On 28 févr. 2013, at 22:29, Neil Puttock n.putt...@gmail.com wrote:
On Feb 28, 2013 8:37 PM, m...@mikesolomon.org m...@mikesolomon.org wrote:
You're right, but I've opted for the breaking behavior in the most recent
patch-set (\breakSlurHere). Otherwise, slurs wouldn't be able to span
Hey all,
Working on eliminating the translate_axis call from axis-group-interface, I've
found a less-than-ideal situation in the naming/using of interfaces and
properties that I'd like to clean up, but it'd be a major, major change and
would take time to implement. So, before starting it as a
On 27 févr. 2013, at 07:22, k-ohara5...@oco.net wrote:
The cardinal cantle seems meldable, but first the cruft needs to be
strained.
https://codereview.appspot.com/7377046/diff/11001/scm/define-grobs.scm
File scm/define-grobs.scm (right):
On 27 févr. 2013, at 07:03, k-ohara5...@oco.net wrote:
Just needs cleanup of some leftover unneeded complications.
https://codereview.appspot.com/7310075/diff/38001/lily/skyline.cc
File lily/skyline.cc (right):
On 27 févr. 2013, at 07:06, k-ohara5...@oco.net wrote:
Also needs some decruftification.
https://codereview.appspot.com/7304068/diff/22001/lily/align-interface.cc
File lily/align-interface.cc (right):
https://codereview.appspot.com/7304068/diff/22001/lily/align-interface.cc#newcode299
On 27 févr. 2013, at 19:06, d...@gnu.org wrote:
https://codereview.appspot.com/7377046/diff/17001/input/regression/scheme-text-spanner.ly
File input/regression/scheme-text-spanner.ly (right):
On 25 févr. 2013, at 15:10, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
James pkx1...@gmail.com writes:
On 25 February 2013 12:00, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Phil Holmes em...@philholmes.net writes:
I've run my pixel comparator on 2.17.13 versus 2.17.12 (note -
the output shows this as
On 25 févr. 2013, at 16:29, d...@gnu.org wrote:
On 2013/02/24 16:20:53, mike7 wrote:
On 24 févr. 2013, at 17:18, David Kastrup mailto:d...@gnu.org wrote:
m...@mikesolomon.org mailto:m...@mikesolomon.org writes:
On 24 févr. 2013, at 16:37, mailto:d...@gnu.org wrote:
On 2013/02/24 13
On 25 févr. 2013, at 23:34, m...@mikesolomon.org wrote:
On 25 févr. 2013, at 16:29, d...@gnu.org wrote:
On 2013/02/24 16:20:53, mike7 wrote:
On 24 févr. 2013, at 17:18, David Kastrup mailto:d...@gnu.org wrote:
m...@mikesolomon.org mailto:m...@mikesolomon.org writes:
On 24 févr. 2013
On 24 févr. 2013, at 12:40, d...@gnu.org wrote:
Stupid question: could you not just check whether outside-staff-priority
has been set, and if it has, pass the buck to the right kind of callback
automatically? That way, the user does not need to meddle with
callbacks himself.
1 - 100 of 308 matches
Mail list logo
