Re: 5th anniversary conference? :)

nutes away... I can be there on a moment's notice, starting next week. This is exciting! On Fri, 23 Feb 2024 at 07:48, Kieren MacMillan wrote: > Hi Mike! > > > I live in Toronto, in the Annex. I'd love to help organize something > here if there's interest. I'm right > > clos

Re: 5th anniversary conference? :)

re. possible toronto conference location I live in Toronto, in the Annex. I'd love to help organize something here if there's interest. I'm right close to the University of Toronto campus. -Mike On Thu, 15 Feb 2024 at 09:19, Kieren MacMillan wrote: > Hey all, > > >> I

Re: Add Code of Conduct (issue 575620043 by janek.lilyp...@gmail.com)

On 2020/02/05 18:17:25, c_sorensen wrote: > I recognize that Mike Solomon has a different opinion. I mean no disrespect to > Mike, Janek, Han-Wen, or any other member of the LilyPond team. I highly value > the team spirit of the LilyPond team. >Well said. Here's the curren

Re: Add Code of Conduct (issue 575620043 by janek.lilyp...@gmail.com)

Mike Solomon writes: >> What does "implement" mean? > > Sorry, I wasn't clear. I meant merge the PR. > Uh, words have meanings. There would be no point of putting something into our documentation that we are not going to follow through with. By merging it, the ide

Re: Add Code of Conduct (issue 575620043 by janek.lilyp...@gmail.com)

> What does "implement" mean? Sorry, I wasn't clear. I meant merge the PR.

Re: Add Code of Conduct (issue 575620043 by janek.lilyp...@gmail.com)

of conduct with clear steps for reporting violations and consequences for repeat offenders, so I'm probably not the best person to make the final call. ~Mike

RE: Add Code of Conduct (issue 575620043 by janek.lilyp...@gmail.com)

Mike Solomon writes: > The preamble and intent is one thing; adding a corrective committee with the > authority to enact punishments based on anonymous reports is another. It > implements hierarchies and institutions exerting coercive power based on > incomplete and secret

RE: Add Code of Conduct (issue 575620043 by janek.lilyp...@gmail.com)

Janek Warchoł writes: > Hi, > > śr., 5 lut 2020, 00:34 użytkownik napisał: > >> What problem are we trying to solve here? >> > > In short, it's been found (I think Mike will be able to give you > specific > examples) that having code of conduct encourages c

Re: Stepping down and moving on

+1 many times over. Thank you for your excellent, creative, and vital work in helping LilyPond become the world’s best and most stable digital music engraver. Best of luck! ~Mike On 10 November 2016 at 13.23.24, Kieren MacMillan (kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca) wrote: Dear David

Re: GSoC 2016 - GNU website listing

Hey! Late to the party - I unfortunately cannot do mentoring this summer. However, all of the issues on the current website are still valid and I'd love to see someone work on them! All the best,~Mike Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone. Original message From: Urs Liska &l

RE: Beginning contributor needs mentor

algorithm at the heart of LilyPond's horizontal spacing engine, so that can be a place to start if you're up for it! Cheers,~Mike PS If you're not the John Gourlay of which I speak, my offer for help still stands! Sent from my Samsung device Original message From: John

Re: Beginning contributor needs mentor

I'll scour the tracker - there is a bit of low hanging fruit in the beautifying department that is nice because it will not be too sprawling and will result in immediately perceptible visual improvements. ~Mike Sent from my Samsung device Original message From: John

Re: Anybody invested in ly:make-simple-closure?

> On 24 Sep 2015, at 13:18, David Kastrup wrote: > > Han-Wen Nienhuys writes: > >> IIRC, it was introduced to compose offset callbacks, > > Oh, it's still being used for that as far as I can tell. Just not from > Scheme. I think before lambdas were widely

Re: pure/impure?!?!

require a major rewrite of a lot of things. Cheers, ~Mike ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Re: pure/impure?!?!

On 21 May 2015, at 11:01, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote: In the CG I read For certain grobs, the @code{Y-extent} is based on the @code{stencil} property, overriding the stencil property of one of these will require an additional @code{Y-extent} override with an unpure-pure

Re: Added recorder diagram (issue 153380043 by pkx1...@gmail.com)

On Nov 2, 2014, at 10:58 PM, pkx1...@gmail.com wrote: i don't know scheme, so i was mainly pattern-matching from existing diagrams. some issues i had while trying to figure this out: - what is the purpose of the baked-in cc/lh/rh grouping? This was a feature of the original design

Re: Added recorder diagram (issue 153380043 by pkx1...@gmail.com)

On Nov 2, 2014, at 10:58 PM, pkx1...@gmail.com wrote: I'm not comfortable pushing this, there were some things on the original email http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-lilypond/2014-10/msg00024.html (after which I offered to help move a patch through the list) that I am simply not

Re: Limit looping in Grob::common_refpoint (issue 4079) (issue 134600043 by e...@ticalc.org)

On Sep 7, 2014, at 9:46 PM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote: Mike Solomon m...@mikesolomon.org writes: +1. The only other solution I see is to check when the parental relationship is being created, but this check results in a performance hit. There is no real point in checking

Re: Limit looping in Grob::common_refpoint (issue 4079) (issue 134600043 by e...@ticalc.org)

On Sep 7, 2014, at 4:15 PM, e...@ticalc.org wrote: On 2014/09/07 06:20:59, dak wrote: I don't like it. The maximum range of a variable is an arbitrary value and this loop avoidance will not do us much good on a 64-bit architecture. Thanks for pointing that out. I will make the limits

Re: Bug in Lookup::bezier_sandwich

On Sep 1, 2014, at 11:16 AM, James pkx1...@gmail.com wrote: On 31/08/14 08:22, Mike Solomon wrote: On Aug 31, 2014, at 1:42 AM, Jürgen Reuter reute...@web.de wrote: Mike, appearently, the following patch works fine for my purposes (i.e. for flexa / porrectus shapes): diff --git

Re: Bug in Lookup::bezier_sandwich

On Aug 31, 2014, at 1:42 AM, Jürgen Reuter reute...@web.de wrote: Mike, appearently, the following patch works fine for my purposes (i.e. for flexa / porrectus shapes): diff --git a/lily/lookup.cc b/lily/lookup.cc index 344d42c..306d04e 100644 --- a/lily/lookup.cc +++ b/lily

Re: get_property vs internal_get_property (was: issue 127860043)

On Aug 18, 2014, at 9:39 AM, Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, it's time to ask a n00b question and get the elephant (that was bothering me for a couple years) out of the room: why do we have - and use! - both get_property and internal_get_property? We ought to use

Re: LilyPond meeting 2014?

/listinfo/lilypond-devel I’d love to meet up but I am in gig mode as well towards the end of the summer and we have a newborn in the house. Hope you guys can work something out! I’d definitely attend as much as I could over IRC. ~Mike ___ lilypond-devel

Re: fixing German's Wikipedia entry of LilyPond

On Jan 13, 2014, at 11:04 AM, Werner LEMBERG w...@gnu.org wrote: My Windows machine won't convert this to SVG. Would someone else like to and to upload the SVG? Hmm. I tried lilypond -dbackend=svg stockhausen.ly and get the error warning: cannot find SVG font #f BTW, what

Re: how close are we to having an addAt or insertAt feature?

On Jan 14, 2014, at 1:03 AM, Kieren MacMillan kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca wrote: Hello all, What would be involved in developing a feature to add notes or tweaks at an arbitrary moment within a music expression? e.g. global = \repeat unfold 100 s1 music = \addAt (4 3/8)

Re: 3.0?

On Jan 9, 2014, at 1:07 PM, Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org wrote: Am 09.01.2014 12:03, schrieb Jan Nieuwenhuizen: Urs Liska writes: Is there _any_ notion what a LilyPond 3.0 may be? I could imagine that if LilyPond were made into an engraving library, and/or heavy rewiring to make it

Re: Building Lilypond documentation

On Jan 2, 2014, at 1:29 PM, Sven Axelsson sven.axels...@gmail.com wrote: I've decided to get at least a little active in Lilypond development, and thought I should start with getting my development environment up and running. I get some weird errors when building the different doc targets,

Re: note-spacing: stretch somewhat uniformly; issue 3304 (issue 36830045)

On Dec 16, 2013, at 10:24 AM, k-ohara5...@oco.net wrote: Reviewers: MikeSol, Message: On 2013/12/16 07:42:52, MikeSol wrote: If you understand this stuff, could you put a comment in lily/include/spring.hh as to what inverse_compress_strength and inverse_stretch_strength are? They

Re: Adds outside-staff-interface and outside-staff-axis-group-interface (issue 37950044)

On Dec 16, 2013, at 11:45 AM, d...@gnu.org wrote: The summary seems incompatible with URL:http://music.stackexchange.com/a/14160/8773 Once an interface is required for outside-staffing a grob, the set of grobs one can use in that manner is hardwired to the intended grobs. This is true.

Re: Adds outside-staff-interface and outside-staff-axis-group-interface (issue 37950044)

On Dec 16, 2013, at 11:56 AM, tdanielsmu...@googlemail.com wrote: I applaud this! Properties in an interface which were not honoured when processing certain grobs which purported to implement that interface really irritated me when trying to write documentation. Trevor

Re: Adds outside-staff-interface and outside-staff-axis-group-interface (issue 37950044)

On Dec 16, 2013, at 12:07 PM, d...@gnu.org wrote: On 2013/12/16 09:58:40, mike7 wrote: On Dec 16, 2013, at 11:45 AM, mailto:d...@gnu.org wrote: The summary seems incompatible with URL:http://music.stackexchange.com/a/14160/8773 Once an interface is required for outside-staffing a

Re: anyone notice speed of 2.17.95 on Windows ?

On Dec 15, 2013, at 10:46 AM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote: Mike Solomon m...@mikesolomon.org writes: The layout engine could use get_property_data() freely, but before it has set line-breaks the layout engine would refrain from calling any callback functions directly. Instead

Re: anyone notice speed of 2.17.95 on Windows ?

On Dec 15, 2013, at 11:22 AM, Trevor Daniels t.dani...@treda.co.uk wrote: Werner LEMBERG wrote Sunday, December 15, 2013 9:07 AM raw/final would be shorter than pure/unpure. I like that. At least for me this is easier to understand from a conceptual point of view. pencil/ink. All

Re: anyone notice speed of 2.17.95 on Windows ?

On Dec 14, 2013, at 9:21 AM, Keith OHara k-ohara5...@oco.net wrote: On Fri, 13 Dec 2013 23:05:49 -0800, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote: That does not make sense. If you want call-once behavior, you can just use a callback. At the moment, the decision on whether to preserve the callback

Re: anyone notice speed of 2.17.95 on Windows ?

On Dec 14, 2013, at 9:35 AM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote: Keith OHara k-ohara5...@oco.net writes: On Fri, 13 Dec 2013 23:05:49 -0800, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote: That does not make sense. If you want call-once behavior, you can just use a callback. At the moment, the

Re: grob-property: if callback is independent of layout, call just once (issue 42190043)

On Dec 14, 2013, at 12:00 PM, d...@gnu.org wrote: https://codereview.appspot.com/42190043/diff/1/lily/unpure-pure-container.cc File lily/unpure-pure-container.cc (right): https://codereview.appspot.com/42190043/diff/1/lily/unpure-pure-container.cc#newcode45

Re: anyone notice speed of 2.17.95 on Windows ?

On Dec 15, 2013, at 12:58 AM, Keith OHara k-ohara5...@oco.net wrote: On Sat, 14 Dec 2013 00:49:43 -0800, Mike Solomon m...@mikesolomon.org wrote: On Dec 14, 2013, at 9:35 AM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote: Most of the contortions seem focused about when or when not and how to pass

Re: anyone notice speed of 2.17.95 on Windows ?

On Dec 12, 2013, at 10:43 AM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote: Werner LEMBERG w...@gnu.org writes: One extra lookup per glyph might be enough to explain the difference. We need to look up the glyph to get a skyline, but maybe could cache its index into the font in the stencil. That does

Re: Website questions: GSoC

On Dec 12, 2013, at 3:06 PM, Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org wrote: The page GSoC 2012 is obviously outdated. What should be done with it? Immediate reaction: Put it on the attic. But: Would it be useful to write a summary of what of it actually happened? If yes: Is there something

gdb and hanging lilypond

Hey all, On my GCC-built-but-running-on-OSX lilypond, LilyPond has started to hang at the “Finding the ideal number of pages” stage. I have compiled LilyPond with debugging and without optimization, but when I gdb it and kill the process, no meaningful stack trace is given: My wild guess is

Re: anyone notice speed of 2.17.95 on Windows ?

On Dec 13, 2013, at 9:07 AM, Keith OHara k-ohara5...@oco.net wrote: On Tue, 10 Dec 2013 22:44:18 -0800, Keith OHara k-ohara5...@oco.net wrote: After a brief look at the code, it looked like for each glyph being laid out there is one extra call of Open_type_font:: or

Re: branching

On Dec 11, 2013, at 11:36 AM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote: Mike Solomon m...@mikesolomon.org writes: I had coffee with a developer a year or so ago who told me that he dropped out of the project because of commutation problems with David. Last night I wrote to him to share some

Re: branching

On Dec 11, 2013, at 11:36 AM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote: Mike Solomon m...@mikesolomon.org writes: We are currently taking a look at how to create regions of LilyPond that can be worked on independently and without affecting the overall quality of LilyPond. If we manage to do

Re: branching

On Dec 11, 2013, at 2:18 PM, Trevor Daniels t.dani...@treda.co.uk wrote: Mike Solomon wrote Wednesday, December 11, 2013 10:22 AM On Dec 11, 2013, at 11:36 AM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote: As opposed to me, Graham excelled at organizing and maintaining community efforts like

Re: branching

On Dec 11, 2013, at 3:56 PM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote: Mike Solomon m...@mikesolomon.org writes: On Dec 11, 2013, at 11:36 AM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote: [...] But that’s no good - we have to find a solution. Modularity, while perhaps a good long term solution

Re: anyone notice speed of 2.17.95 on Windows ?

On Dec 10, 2013, at 10:36 AM, Keith OHara k-ohara5...@oco.net wrote: On Mon, 25 Nov 2013 00:10:08 -0800, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote: Keith OHara k-ohara5...@oco.net writes: I timed one big score, Movement 1 of http://www.mutopiaproject.org/cgibin/piece-info.cgi?id=1793

Re: anyone notice speed of 2.17.95 on Windows ?

On Dec 10, 2013, at 11:27 AM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote: Mike Solomon m...@mikesolomon.org writes: On Dec 10, 2013, at 10:36 AM, Keith OHara k-ohara5...@oco.net wrote: On Mon, 25 Nov 2013 00:10:08 -0800, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote: Keith OHara k-ohara5...@oco.net writes

Re: anyone notice speed of 2.17.95 on Windows ?

On Dec 10, 2013, at 11:47 AM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote: Mike Solomon m...@mikesolomon.org writes: On Dec 10, 2013, at 11:27 AM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote: Mike Solomon m...@mikesolomon.org writes: On Dec 10, 2013, at 10:36 AM, Keith OHara k-ohara5...@oco.net wrote: I

Re: anyone notice speed of 2.17.95 on Windows ?

On Dec 10, 2013, at 12:18 PM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote: Mike Solomon m...@mikesolomon.org writes: On Dec 10, 2013, at 11:47 AM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote: Nope. In this case, the answer is to cache frequently accessed information instead of requesting it again and again

branching

Hey all, As 2.18 draws near, I’d like to work with everyone to establish a system of branching for LilyPond development. After several rounds of discussing things with David K, this emerged as the best way to avoid arguments about integrating work into the development branch that have led

Re: branching

On Dec 10, 2013, at 2:58 PM, Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca wrote: On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 02:42:45PM +0200, Mike Solomon wrote: On the website, we would offer _all_ of these development branches, including the one built off of staging, as GUB builds. A few years ago, we were

Re: branching

On Dec 10, 2013, at 4:23 PM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote: Mike Solomon m...@mikesolomon.org writes: Hey all, As 2.18 draws near, I’d like to work with everyone to establish a system of branching for LilyPond development. After several rounds of discussing things with David K

Re: branching

On Dec 10, 2013, at 9:32 PM, Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu wrote: On 12/10/13 5:42 AM, Mike Solomon m...@mikesolomon.org wrote: Hey all, As 2.18 draws near, I¹d like to work with everyone to establish a system of branching for LilyPond development. After several rounds

Re: branching

On Dec 11, 2013, at 12:03 AM, David Nalesnik david.nales...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 2:46 PM, Carl Peterson carlopeter...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 3:21 PM, Mike Solomon m...@mikesolomon.org wrote: The only hassle for me, which I did not run up

Re: centralization of lilypond development and forking (was: branching)

On Dec 11, 2013, at 9:18 AM, Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca wrote: On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 08:39:58AM +0200, Mike Solomon wrote: See: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Allows-minimum-length-to-work-for-end-of-line-spanners-issue-7453046-td141952.html#a142870 as one

Re: Some audicious hand-engraved slurs compared to LilyPond

On Dec 3, 2013, at 4:19 PM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote: David Nalesnik david.nales...@gmail.com writes: So I wanted to share the slurs, and then LilyPond surprised me with awful tuplet numbers. I’m guessing that there are a few things stopping the number from lining up nicely, but

Re: Some audicious hand-engraved slurs compared to LilyPond

On Dec 3, 2013, at 4:51 PM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote: Mike Solomon m...@mikesolomon.org writes: On Dec 3, 2013, at 4:19 PM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote: David Nalesnik david.nales...@gmail.com writes: So I wanted to share the slurs, and then LilyPond surprised me

Communication style on the devel list

On Nov 30, 2013, at 10:58 PM, Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com wrote: 2013/11/30 Mike Solomon m...@mikesolomon.org: I would argue that the point that Janek brings up above is not a healthy sign for LilyPond development. Several developers, including myself, have lowered

v_size in lexer.cc

Hey all, Compiling LilyPond with g++ on mac os x, I get the following errors: out/lexer.cc: At global scope: out/lexer.cc:32:25: error: prototype for 'size_t yyFlexLexer::LexerInput(char*, size_t)' does not match any in class 'yyFlexLexer' #define yyFlexLexer yyFlexLexer

Re: v_size in lexer.cc

On Nov 13, 2013, at 12:11 AM, Keith OHara k-ohara5...@oco.net wrote: Mike Solomon mike at mikesolomon.org writes: out/lexer.cc:32:25: error: prototype for 'size_t yyFlexLexer::LexerInput(char*, size_t)' does not match any in class 'yyFlexLexer' out/lexer.cc:6460:8: note: in expansion

Re: Continuing towards 2.18

On Nov 5, 2013, at 9:23 AM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote: So I'm more comfortable reverting it as well. Go for it, but could someone please remind me to push it to 2.19 if I forget? Cheers, MS ___ lilypond-devel mailing list

Re: mac os x 10.9 and libguile.h

On Nov 2, 2013, at 1:46 PM, Mike Solomon m...@mikesolomon.org wrote: On Nov 2, 2013, at 1:17 PM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote: Mike Solomon m...@mikesolomon.org writes: So this definitely gives a directory with libguile.h in it. But for some reason it’s not found

Re: mac os x 10.9 and libguile.h

On Nov 3, 2013, at 9:37 AM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote: Mike Solomon m...@mikesolomon.org writes: mbp-de-mike:build mikesolomon$ ls /usr/local/Cellar/guile18/1.8.8/include guilelibguilelibguile.h I’m stumped. It is obvious that CPPFLAGS is pointing

compilation errors from Xcode's new standard library

Looks like some files in flower don't play nice with the most recent version of the standard library bundled with Xcode… snip clang: warning: argument unused during compilation: '-mno-fused-madd' clang: warning: argument unused during compilation: '-L/usr/local/lib' In file included from

Re: compilation errors from Xcode's new standard library

to fix them. Mike, can you try typing on a terminal prompt both: g++ --version clang++ —version So g++ simlinks to clang, and it is a special apple-brewed clang based on 3.3 mbp-de-mike:SCRIPTS mikesolomon$ g++ --version Configured with: --prefix=/Applications/Xcode.app/Contents

Re: compilation errors from Xcode's new standard library

On Nov 3, 2013, at 10:37 AM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote: Joseph Rushton Wakeling joseph.wakel...@webdrake.net writes: On 03/11/13 10:09, Mike Solomon wrote: Looks like some files in flower don't play nice with the most recent version of the standard library bundled with Xcode… Any

Re: compilation errors from Xcode's new standard library

On Nov 3, 2013, at 11:15 AM, Joseph Rushton Wakeling joseph.wakel...@webdrake.net wrote: On 03/11/13 11:00, Mike Solomon wrote: That’s fine, I’ll download gcc. From what I understand from friends who've experienced the same, you'll have to manually remove/rewrite some of the symlinks

Re: compilation errors from Xcode's new standard library

On Nov 3, 2013, at 11:45 AM, Joseph Rushton Wakeling joseph.wakel...@webdrake.net wrote: On 03/11/13 11:18, Mike Solomon wrote: Yeah, the output is fine (clean bill of health, all systems go). I had to specifically set CPPFLAGS to deal w/ some homebrew issues, but otherwise nothing out

Re: compilation errors from Xcode's new standard library

On Nov 3, 2013, at 1:15 PM, Joseph Rushton Wakeling joseph.wakel...@webdrake.net wrote: On 03/11/13 12:33, Mike Solomon wrote: [ ... snip ... ] …these fonts are always a pain, but I usually figure out some way to cheat and get them in there. But that shouldn’t have anything to do

Re: compilation errors from Xcode's new standard library

On Nov 3, 2013, at 1:50 PM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote: Mike Solomon m...@mikesolomon.org writes: Apple’s home cooked clang is not free software, so there’s no reason to expect free software to compile with it. Non sequitur. There is nothing wrong with trying to bring some more

Re: compilation errors from Xcode's new standard library

On Nov 3, 2013, at 2:00 PM, Joseph Rushton Wakeling joseph.wakel...@webdrake.net wrote: On 03/11/13 13:36, Mike Solomon wrote: Doesn’t work, but all the files in flower compile fine with gcc, so I’m a happy camper. Apple’s home cooked clang is not free software, so there’s no reason

Re: compilation errors from Xcode's new standard library

On Nov 3, 2013, at 2:03 PM, Mike Solomon m...@mikesolomon.org wrote: On Nov 3, 2013, at 2:00 PM, Joseph Rushton Wakeling joseph.wakel...@webdrake.net wrote: On 03/11/13 13:36, Mike Solomon wrote: Doesn’t work, but all the files in flower compile fine with gcc, so I’m a happy camper

Re: compilation errors from Xcode's new standard library

On Nov 3, 2013, at 2:20 PM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote: Mike Solomon m...@mikesolomon.org writes: On Nov 3, 2013, at 1:50 PM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote: Shrug. At any rate, it would be important to get some feedback regarding installation of the stock LilyPond binary

mac os x 10.9 and libguile.h

Hey all, In my update to OS X 10.9, I’ve had to uninstall and reinstall lots of stuff. In the LilyPond configure script, I get snip checking for guile-config... guile-config checking guile-config version... 1.8.8 checking guile compile flags... -I/usr/local/Cellar/guile18/1.8.8/include

Re: mac os x 10.9 and libguile.h

On Nov 2, 2013, at 1:17 PM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote: Mike Solomon m...@mikesolomon.org writes: Hey all, In my update to OS X 10.9, I’ve had to uninstall and reinstall lots of stuff. In the LilyPond configure script, I get snip checking for guile-config... guile-config

Re: [Lilypond-auto] Issue 3631 in lilypond: 2.17 does a worse job with vertical spacing and/or the page layout than 2.16

On Nov 2, 2013, at 3:03 PM, lilyp...@googlecode.com wrote: Comment #45 on issue 3631 by d...@gnu.org: 2.17 does a worse job with vertical spacing and/or the page layout than 2.16 http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3631 Can do. Can you send a git-format-patch by mail, or

Re: [Lilypond-auto] Issue 3631 in lilypond: 2.17 does a worse job with vertical spacing and/or the page layout than 2.16

On Nov 2, 2013, at 3:32 PM, Joseph Rushton Wakeling joseph.wakel...@webdrake.net wrote: On 02/11/13 15:12, Mike Solomon wrote: Not sure what a git formatted patch is…I can, however, download the Rietveld patch and send it to you if you want. Git can extract text patch files from your

Re: Looks for prebroken pieces of dead items in the pure relevant function. (issue 18090043)

On Nov 1, 2013, at 7:49 AM, k-ohara5...@oco.net wrote: On 2013/10/30 08:09:53, mike7 wrote: On Oct 30, 2013, at 8:32 AM, mailto:k-ohara5...@oco.net wrote: I do not understand the Todo: comment; nothing should have been suicided at this stage. The original clef is suicided in the

Re: Looks for prebroken pieces of dead items in the pure relevant function. (issue 18090043)

On Nov 1, 2013, at 8:31 AM, lemzw...@googlemail.com wrote: https://codereview.appspot.com/18090043/diff/60001/lily/axis-group-interface.cc File lily/axis-group-interface.cc (right): https://codereview.appspot.com/18090043/diff/60001/lily/axis-group-interface.cc#newcode507

Re: Looks for prebroken pieces of dead items in the pure relevant function. (issue 18090043)

On Oct 30, 2013, at 8:32 AM, k-ohara5...@oco.net wrote: I do not understand the Todo: comment; nothing should have been suicided at this stage. What is the life cycle of a Clef and the copies made for line-breaking possibilities? The original clef is suicided in the

Re: Remove DynamicText from script-interface (issue 14424044)

Make sure to acknowledge dynamic text in slur-proto-engraver.cc and tuplet-engraver.cc. https://codereview.appspot.com/14424044/ ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Re: Checks to see if tuplet brackets have bounds (issue 13582046)

On 13 sept. 2013, at 08:41, d...@gnu.org wrote: https://codereview.appspot.com/13582046/diff/1/lily/tuplet-bracket.cc File lily/tuplet-bracket.cc (right): https://codereview.appspot.com/13582046/diff/1/lily/tuplet-bracket.cc#newcode99 lily/tuplet-bracket.cc:99: if (!left || !right) Too

Re: Checks to see if tuplet brackets have bounds (issue 13582046)

to _know_ the defenses to be triggered without us expecting it, we should make use of the opportunity to analyze what is going wrong here. Mike says that the change is due to more crossstaff checks happening now. I have no better guess here, but the issue description of issue 3199 does

Re: stencil-integral: use box extents specified in markup; issue 3255 (issue 9295044)

On 30 août 2013, at 07:49, Keith OHara k-ohara5...@oco.net wrote: On Thu, 29 Aug 2013 21:24:25 -0700, lemzw...@googlemail.com wrote: Conceptually, I prefer (1), but this is based on your descriptions and the previous discussion, not on understanding the code... Then look at (2) and see

Re: stencil-integral: use box extents specified in markup; issue 3255 (issue 9295044)

On 30 août 2013, at 10:11, d...@gnu.org wrote: On 2013/08/30 07:41:49, mike7 wrote: I'd still argue that (2) is the best way to go as it is a one-stop-shopping way to clear all these bugs (and perhaps more) as they arise. Since we are currently in the process of recovering from the last

Re: stencil-integral: use box extents specified in markup; issue 3255 (issue 9295044)

On 30 août 2013, at 11:39, d...@gnu.org wrote: I suggest that we refrain from embracing your somewhat optimistic estimates until after wrapping up a stable release. I don't see the relationship between the two. Which makes it a good thing that you are not pursuing a career as

Re: Allows inner-markup spacing using skylines. (issue 13341044)

, but as it is not default beahvior anywhere in the code base, it allows people to decide on the efficiency versus snugness-of-placement trade-off. For people creating complex markups, this is useful. Mike, the question is not whether or not it is useful to work with the distance of skylines. The problem

Re: Adds dimension stencil command to correct with-dimension (issue 12957047)

On 28 août 2013, at 05:28, Keith OHara k-ohara5...@oco.net wrote: On Mon, 26 Aug 2013 23:57:58 -0700, Mike Solomon m...@mikesolomon.org wrote: On 27 août 2013, at 09:01, Keith OHara k-ohara5...@oco.net wrote: On Mon, 26 Aug 2013 22:37:17 -0700, Mike Solomon m...@mikesolomon.org wrote

Re: Adds dimension stencil command to correct with-dimension (issue 12957047)

On 28 août 2013, at 09:47, Keith OHara k-ohara5...@oco.net wrote: On Tue, 27 Aug 2013 23:30:32 -0700, Mike Solomon m...@mikesolomon.org wrote: On 28 août 2013, at 05:28, Keith OHara k-ohara5...@oco.net wrote: Of course I think it would be better to allow box dimensions in the stencil

Re: Adds dimension stencil command to correct with-dimension (issue 12957047)

On 27 août 2013, at 09:01, Keith OHara k-ohara5...@oco.net wrote: On Mon, 26 Aug 2013 22:37:17 -0700, Mike Solomon m...@mikesolomon.org wrote: On 27 août 2013, at 07:18, Keith OHara k-ohara5...@oco.net wrote: (1) At the moment, the stencil expressions are assembled first, when markup

Re: Adds dimension stencil command to correct with-dimension (issue 12957047)

On 27 août 2013, at 11:09, d...@gnu.org wrote: On 2013/08/27 06:58:05, mike7 wrote: On 27 août 2013, at 09:01, Keith OHara mailto:k-ohara5...@oco.net wrote: How are skylines asked-for, and is it possible to know if they were asked for while interpreting the markup ? {c4-\markup

Re: Adds dimension stencil command to correct with-dimension (issue 12957047)

On 26 août 2013, at 08:35, d...@gnu.org wrote: On 2013/08/26 05:25:42, mike7 wrote: On 26 août 2013, at 08:20, mailto:d...@gnu.org wrote: Indeed. Instead of calling stencil-integrate on a surrogate stencil or whatever for deriving a skyline, the respective stencil operation in

Re: Adds dimension stencil command to correct with-dimension (issue 12957047)

On 26 août 2013, at 11:41, d...@gnu.org wrote: On 2013/08/26 06:42:38, mike7 wrote: On 26 août 2013, at 08:35, mailto:d...@gnu.org wrote: So why do you talk about that in the first place? Because I'd rather spend more time implementing a solid system than less time implementing a

Re: Adds dimension stencil command to correct with-dimension (issue 12957047)

On 26 août 2013, at 12:39, Werner LEMBERG w...@gnu.org wrote: To summarize: stencil expressions (expr_) currently do not contain information for how to place stencils with respect to others. They contain information passed to the backends on how to lay out stencils. If we adopt either

Re: Adds dimension stencil command to correct with-dimension (issue 12957047)

On 26 août 2013, at 13:00, d...@gnu.org wrote: That's bullshit since nobody assembles stencil expressions manually. I assemble stencil expressions manually. This is done using opaque functions like ly:stencil-translate. ly:make-stencil is all over the place in the code and is a public

Re: Adds dimension stencil command to correct with-dimension (issue 12957047)

On 26 août 2013, at 13:13, d...@gnu.org wrote: On 2013/08/26 10:05:25, mike7 wrote: On 26 août 2013, at 13:00, mailto:d...@gnu.org wrote: That's bullshit since nobody assembles stencil expressions manually. I assemble stencil expressions manually. If you meddle with internals, that's

Re: Adds dimension stencil command to correct with-dimension (issue 12957047)

On 26 août 2013, at 13:31, d...@gnu.org wrote: On 2013/08/26 10:18:04, mike7 wrote: I think Harm is right that, irrespective of documentation, users use what's available. If people meddle with internals instead of using provided API functions, they deserve whatever they get. If

Re: Adds dimension stencil command to correct with-dimension (issue 12957047)

On 27 août 2013, at 07:18, Keith OHara k-ohara5...@oco.net wrote: On Mon, 26 Aug 2013 02:11:28 -0700, Mike Solomon m...@mikesolomon.org wrote: I think that if we can devise a better system, the creation of a new stencil primitive is unnecessary. If we agree that we should implement

Re: Adds dimension stencil command to correct with-dimension (issue 12957047)

On 25 août 2013, at 09:15, k-ohara5...@oco.net wrote: On 2013/08/24 16:33:39, MikeSol wrote: On 2013/08/24 16:19:27, dak wrote: Stupid question: _iff_ you store a _whole_ replacement skyline anyway, shouldn't pad-around just shift the original left/right/up/down skylines

Re: Adds dimension stencil command to correct with-dimension (issue 12957047)

On 25 août 2013, at 16:04, d...@gnu.org wrote: On 2013/08/25 08:22:01, mike7 wrote: On 25 août 2013, at 09:15, mailto:k-ohara5...@oco.net wrote: A second stencil is not a very good data structure for reserving space. Skylines are better at this, and we can \once\override 'padding and

  1   2   3   4   >