Le 23 nov. 2009 à 01:03, David Kastrup a écrit :
The specification of category and properties makes the *-builtin-*
variants diverge syntactically from the user specified markup. Moving
those specifications into keyword arguments makes the builtin defining
macros upwards compatible with the
Le 23 nov. 2009 à 22:05, David Kastrup a écrit :
There is no clue just _how_ one should answer the questions or what they
mean.
Oh please... If you had read the git-cl README, which gives the complete
sequence, instead of writing (one more time) a lengthy useless mail,
then the patch would
Nicolas Sceaux nicolas.sce...@gmail.com writes:
I think somewhere you missed a change from
define-builtin-markup-list-command to define-markup-list-command.
I did not change any define-builtin-markup-list-command to
define-markup-list-command in this patch series.
This is precisely what I
And this year's Good Will Generator Award goes to…
I don't think that I can contribute much more to your amusement.
Wow.
I've [fortunately] never witnessed such mindless negative energy on a
mailing list to which I've been subscribed.
___
On 11/23/09 2:05 PM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Nicolas Sceaux nicolas.sce...@gmail.com writes:
Le 23 nov. 2009 à 01:03, David Kastrup a écrit :
The specification of category and properties makes the *-builtin-*
variants diverge syntactically from the user specified markup.
Kieren MacMillan kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca writes:
And this year's Good Will Generator Award goes to…
I don't think that I can contribute much more to your amusement.
Wow.
I've [fortunately] never witnessed such mindless negative energy on a
mailing list to which I've been subscribed.
I don't think that I can contribute much more to your amusement.
Wow.
I've [fortunately] never witnessed such mindless negative energy on
a mailing list to which I've been subscribed.
Guys, cool down. I think everyone of you is interested to improve
lilypond, perhaps it helps if all of
Werner LEMBERG w...@gnu.org writes:
I don't think that I can contribute much more to your amusement.
Wow.
I've [fortunately] never witnessed such mindless negative energy on
a mailing list to which I've been subscribed.
Guys, cool down. I think everyone of you is interested to improve
Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu writes:
On 11/23/09 2:05 PM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Nicolas Sceaux nicolas.sce...@gmail.com writes:
Le 23 nov. 2009 à 01:03, David Kastrup a écrit :
The specification of category and properties makes the *-builtin-*
variants diverge
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 7:45 PM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Han-Wen already posted LGTM, and the patches include patches to the
documentation of the changed macros.
I don't think that I can contribute much more to your amusement.
Nicolas wrote most of the Scheme code, and he has my
Han-Wen Nienhuys hanw...@gmail.com writes:
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 7:45 PM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Han-Wen already posted LGTM, and the patches include patches to the
documentation of the changed macros.
I don't think that I can contribute much more to your amusement.
Nicolas
On Tue, 2009-11-24 at 01:03 +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu writes:
IIUC, our policy is that *every* patch that is applied should result
in a buildable LilyPond. If not, it's a bad patch.
I don't consider this policy prudent in the particular situation API
Joe Neeman joenee...@gmail.com writes:
On Tue, 2009-11-24 at 01:03 +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu writes:
IIUC, our policy is that *every* patch that is applied should result
in a buildable LilyPond. If not, it's a bad patch.
I don't consider this policy
The specification of category and properties makes the *-builtin-*
variants diverge syntactically from the user specified markup. Moving
those specifications into keyword arguments makes the builtin defining
macros upwards compatible with the user specified ones.
---
14 matches
Mail list logo
