Not sure if it was already mentioned...
just installed 2.17.17 and it seems that the new (and nice!) angled
hairpins are not compatible with the circled tip:
\once \override Hairpin #'circled-tip = ##t %%doesn't work
\once \override Hairpin #'stencil = #flared-hairpin
g4\ ~ g4 ~ g8\f
On
On 05/09/2013 02:52 PM, zepadovani.li...@gmail.com wrote:
just installed 2.17.17 and it seems that the new (and nice!) angled
hairpins are not compatible with the circled tip
I think this should be considered a bug, as the two notations are clearly
compatible.
On 03/17/2013 06:47 PM, thomasmorle...@googlemail.com wrote:
And while above the staff dynamic brackets have the hook down.
As I said before, I'd have argued for that feature even in the absence of a
Ferneyhough example, as it makes musical/notational sense. But I think the
example settles it.
On 2013/03/13 21:38:59, thomasmorley65 wrote:
Hi Mike,
sorry to be such an inch pincher.
https://codereview.appspot.com/7615043/diff/23001/scm/output-lib.scm
File scm/output-lib.scm (right):
https://codereview.appspot.com/7615043/diff/23001/scm/output-lib.scm#newcode1061
On 2013/03/17 07:27:37, MikeSol wrote:
On 2013/03/13 21:38:59, thomasmorley65 wrote:
https://codereview.appspot.com/7615043/diff/23001/scm/output-lib.scm
File scm/output-lib.scm (right):
https://codereview.appspot.com/7615043/diff/23001/scm/output-lib.scm#newcode1061
On 17 mars 2013, at 13:36, thomasmorle...@googlemail.com wrote:
On 2013/03/17 07:27:37, MikeSol wrote:
On 2013/03/13 21:38:59, thomasmorley65 wrote:
https://codereview.appspot.com/7615043/diff/23001/scm/output-lib.scm
File scm/output-lib.scm (right):
On 2013/03/17 14:37:52, thomasmorley65 wrote:
This is doable, but I'd wait to see from someone who knows how these
things
work
if this is actually how they are printed.
I want to say that they are always printed with the line going up
irrespective
of the side of the staff, but I could be
On 03/17/2013 05:28 PM, m...@mikesolomon.org wrote:
My suggestion was flairpin, which is infinitely cheesier and thus way cooler.
I know, but ... at the end of the day, less clear in meaning than either
ferneyhough-hairpin or flared-hairpin. Sad but IMO true. :-P
On a related issue: one thing that's probably clear looking at
Ferneyhough scores is the way in which the vertical placement of hairpin
endpoints is strongly coupled with the vertical placement of dynamic
marks.
I don't think it's really appropriate to bundle all of this together
into one
On 17 mars 2013, at 17:25, joseph.wakel...@gmail.com wrote:
Final remark: while it's nice to see Ferneyhough getting namechecked
might it be worth naming this alteration as flared-hairpin rather than
ferneyhough-hairpin?
My suggestion was flairpin, which is infinitely cheesier and thus
On 17 mars 2013, at 17:46, joseph.wakel...@gmail.com wrote:
On a related issue: one thing that's probably clear looking at
Ferneyhough scores is the way in which the vertical placement of hairpin
endpoints is strongly coupled with the vertical placement of dynamic
marks.
I don't think
On 2013/03/17 12:42:02, mike7 wrote:
You'd have to have a wrapper function with a call to ly:scale-stencil
with a -1
to the Y axis based on the direction of the grob.
Sure.
Or in
(define (my-c-p-s ...
as it is done for `decresc?´
This is doable, but I'd wait to see from someone who knows
On 2013/03/17 16:25:55, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
On 2013/03/17 14:37:52, thomasmorley65 wrote:
I want to say that they are always printed with the line going up
irrespective
of the side of the staff, but I could be wrong.
There are Ferneyhough scores with dynamics above the staff
On 13 mars 2013, at 00:02, janek.lilyp...@gmail.com wrote:
Nice hairpins!
Janek
https://codereview.appspot.com/7615043/diff/23001/input/regression/ferneyhough-hairpins.ly
File input/regression/ferneyhough-hairpins.ly (right):
On 03/13/2013 12:22 AM, Janek Warchoł wrote:
this reminds me of an idea i had that would probably play nicely with this:
make it possible to manipulate hairpins' ends separately.
The point would be that you could specify a vertical offset for one
end and thus easily achieve a slanted hairpin
Hi Mike,
sorry to be such an inch pincher.
https://codereview.appspot.com/7615043/diff/23001/scm/output-lib.scm
File scm/output-lib.scm (right):
https://codereview.appspot.com/7615043/diff/23001/scm/output-lib.scm#newcode1061
scm/output-lib.scm:1061: (thick (* thick (layout-line-thickness
Nice hairpins!
Janek
https://codereview.appspot.com/7615043/diff/23001/input/regression/ferneyhough-hairpins.ly
File input/regression/ferneyhough-hairpins.ly (right):
https://codereview.appspot.com/7615043/diff/23001/input/regression/ferneyhough-hairpins.ly#newcode4
hi all,
On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 12:15 AM, thomasmorle...@googlemail.com wrote:
The image Trevor Bača posted
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2013-03/pngIGBdggySyh.png
shows that the left ends of a decrecsendo-hairpin are vertical aligned
even if the hairpin isn't extended
Hi Mike,
sorry to have some more nit-picks.
https://codereview.appspot.com/7615043/diff/15001/scm/output-lib.scm
File scm/output-lib.scm (right):
https://codereview.appspot.com/7615043/diff/15001/scm/output-lib.scm#newcode1051
scm/output-lib.scm:1051: 0.1
Hard-coded thickness.
Why not
On 2013/03/11 23:38:17, thomasmorley65 wrote:
https://codereview.appspot.com/7615043/diff/15001/scm/output-lib.scm#newcode1052
scm/output-lib.scm:1052: 1.0
I'd do the scaling here.
ly:stencil-scale would be superfluous than.
Either scaling-method will change the direction of
On 12 mars 2013, at 00:38, thomasmorle...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi Mike,
sorry to have some more nit-picks.
https://codereview.appspot.com/7615043/diff/15001/scm/output-lib.scm
File scm/output-lib.scm (right):
Hi Mike,
decrescendo doesn't work!!
My idea about drag-hairpin seems not too hard to implement, ofcourse
there would be need to do a clean definition of the property, currently
LilyPond returns a unsurprisingly warning:
#(define-public ((elbowed-hairpin coords mirrored?) grob)
(define
On 10 mars 2013, at 01:47, thomasmorle...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi Mike,
decrescendo doesn't work!!
Yikes! Will fix. Thanks for spotting this.
My idea about drag-hairpin seems not too hard to implement, ofcourse
there would be need to do a clean definition of the property, currently
Hi Mike,
one thought.
The image Trevor Bača posted
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2013-03/pngIGBdggySyh.png
shows that the left ends of a decrecsendo-hairpin are vertical aligned
even if the hairpin isn't extended horizontal but ascending.
Currently the vertical alignment is
On 9 mars 2013, at 00:15, thomasmorle...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi Mike,
one thought.
The image Trevor Bača posted
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2013-03/pngIGBdggySyh.png
shows that the left ends of a decrecsendo-hairpin are vertical aligned
even if the hairpin isn't
https://codereview.appspot.com/7615043/diff/1/scm/output-lib.scm
File scm/output-lib.scm (right):
https://codereview.appspot.com/7615043/diff/1/scm/output-lib.scm#newcode929
scm/output-lib.scm:929: form. @code{x} is the portion of the width
consumed for a given line
On 2013/03/08 06:26:29,
From visual inspection, LGTM.
https://codereview.appspot.com/7615043/diff/1/scm/output-lib.scm
File scm/output-lib.scm (right):
https://codereview.appspot.com/7615043/diff/1/scm/output-lib.scm#newcode929
scm/output-lib.scm:929: form. @code{x} is the portion of the width
consumed for a given
27 matches
Mail list logo
