Nicolas Sceaux nicolas.sce...@gmail.com writes:
Le 12 déc. 2009 à 14:01, David Kastrup a écrit :
{ G4 g D // | /// // / // | \time 3/4 G g / | D // // | /// // // | }
Memorizing more than one chord/note (e.g. 3 chords/notes), and accessing
them using q, qq, qqq, would do it?
Sure. The
Trevor Daniels t.dani...@treda.co.uk writes:
Nicolas Sceaux wrote Saturday, December 12, 2009 3:39 PM
Le 12 déc. 2009 à 14:01, David Kastrup a écrit :
{ G4 g D // | /// // / // | \time 3/4 G g / | D // // | /// // // |
}
Memorizing more than one chord/note (e.g. 3 chords/notes), and
Le 13 déc. 2009 à 11:05, David Kastrup a écrit :
If in an existing score I later replace a q with an explicit chord all
the following q, qq and qqq will need changing too.
Yes. But q, qq, and qqq are not intended for use all across the score,
but rather in confined places. I am not sure
Hi,
I'm taking into account remarks from previous discussions regarding
chord repetition. In particular, I've get rid off the user-settable
memorization function: only chords (with angle brackets) are memorized.
This should be the more useful to users, and at the same time easy
enough for
Two options:
%% The second upper c octave is computed from the first c
%% i.e. the last explicite note.
\relative c' {
c e g8 c' q c r4 q
}
%% The second upper c octave is computed from the previous
%% repeated chord (q)
\relative c' {
c e g8 c' q c' r4 q
}
I'd favor the
Nicolas Sceaux nicolas.sce...@gmail.com writes:
I'm taking into account remarks from previous discussions regarding
chord repetition. In particular, I've get rid off the user-settable
memorization function: only chords (with angle brackets) are memorized.
This should be the more useful to
So I'd think it would be nice to write something like
{ G4 g D // | // // | \time 3/4 G g / | D // / | // // / | }
(number of slashes corresponds with how far you have to look
backwards, in this case counting slash sequences new when they
appear) or without reslash memory
Werner LEMBERG w...@gnu.org writes:
So I'd think it would be nice to write something like
{ G4 g D // | // // | \time 3/4 G g / | D // / | // // / | }
(number of slashes corresponds with how far you have to look
backwards, in this case counting slash sequences new when they
Werner LEMBERG wrote:
Hmm. I won't mind if `q' is able to repeat a single note too, for the
sake of consistency. Nicolas, would this be difficult to implement?
I don't think so - that's what Nicolas had in mind (and implemented)
first. I suppose I'm the one who made him thinking about the
Am Samstag, 12. Dezember 2009 13:29:57 schrieb Nicolas Sceaux:
In particular, I've get rid off the user-settable
memorization function: only chords (with angle brackets) are memorized.
This should be the more useful to users, and at the same time easy
enough for LilyPond-aware editors to
Le 12 déc. 2009 à 14:01, David Kastrup a écrit :
{ G4 g D // | /// // / // | \time 3/4 G g / | D // // | /// // // | }
Memorizing more than one chord/note (e.g. 3 chords/notes), and accessing
them using q, qq, qqq, would do it?
___
lilypond-devel
Nicolas Sceaux wrote Saturday, December 12, 2009 3:39 PM
Le 12 déc. 2009 à 14:01, David Kastrup a écrit :
{ G4 g D // | /// // / // | \time 3/4 G g / | D // // | /// // //
| }
Memorizing more than one chord/note (e.g. 3 chords/notes), and
accessing
them using q, qq, qqq, would do it?
12 matches
Mail list logo
