Re: Fix underline-markup to make multiple calls have nice output (issue 559150043 by thomasmorle...@gmail.com)

2019-10-21 Thread dak
On 2019/10/21 15:36:04, thomasmorley651 wrote: Then we would have the following properties ((thickness 1) (offset 2) (underline-shift 0) (underline-offset 2)) A user-override for underline-shift would disturb things, though. Maybe some words in the doc-string about it? Having both offset

Re: Fix underline-markup to make multiple calls have nice output (issue 559150043 by thomasmorle...@gmail.com)

2019-10-21 Thread thomasmorley65
On 2019/10/21 11:20:03, dak wrote: > > The combination > > \markup \underline \overtie huh > > would likely be madly confusing if the \underline managed to shift the \overtie > around. So maybe \underline should retain the previous meaning and setting of offset and add an _additional_

Re: Fix underline-markup to make multiple calls have nice output (issue 559150043 by thomasmorle...@gmail.com)

2019-10-21 Thread thomasmorley65
On 2019/10/21 11:24:02, thomasmorley651 wrote: On 2019/10/21 11:13:17, dak wrote: > The combination > > \markup \underline \overtie huh > > would likely be madly confusing if the \underline managed to shift the \overtie > around. One could work around with \markup \underline

Re: Fix underline-markup to make multiple calls have nice output (issue 559150043 by thomasmorle...@gmail.com)

2019-10-21 Thread thomasmorley65
On 2019/10/21 10:31:32, dak wrote: On 2019/10/21 09:52:41, thomasmorley651 wrote: > Does this one need a convert-rule? > > If so, I'd need some help. My python-skill is more or less zero. I've just taken some look. It would appear that the only other markup commands using the "offset"

Re: Fix underline-markup to make multiple calls have nice output (issue 559150043 by thomasmorle...@gmail.com)

2019-10-21 Thread dak
On 2019/10/21 11:13:17, dak wrote: On 2019/10/21 11:02:12, thomasmorley651 wrote: > On 2019/10/21 10:31:32, dak wrote: > > On 2019/10/21 09:52:41, thomasmorley651 wrote: > > > Does this one need a convert-rule? > > > > > > If so, I'd need some help. My python-skill is more or less zero. > > > >

Re: Fix underline-markup to make multiple calls have nice output (issue 559150043 by thomasmorle...@gmail.com)

2019-10-21 Thread dak
On 2019/10/21 11:02:12, thomasmorley651 wrote: On 2019/10/21 10:31:32, dak wrote: > On 2019/10/21 09:52:41, thomasmorley651 wrote: > > Does this one need a convert-rule? > > > > If so, I'd need some help. My python-skill is more or less zero. > > I've just taken some look. It would appear that

Re: Fix underline-markup to make multiple calls have nice output (issue 559150043 by thomasmorle...@gmail.com)

2019-10-21 Thread thomasmorley65
On 2019/10/21 11:13:17, dak wrote: The combination \markup \underline \overtie huh would likely be madly confusing if the \underline managed to shift the \overtie around. One could work around with \markup \underline \underline \underline \underline \underline \override

Re: Fix underline-markup to make multiple calls have nice output (issue 559150043 by thomasmorle...@gmail.com)

2019-10-21 Thread dak
On 2019/10/21 09:52:41, thomasmorley651 wrote: Does this one need a convert-rule? If so, I'd need some help. My python-skill is more or less zero. I've just taken some look. It would appear that the only other markup commands using the "offset" property are the \tie/\overtie\undertie

Fix underline-markup to make multiple calls have nice output (issue 559150043 by thomasmorle...@gmail.com)

2019-10-21 Thread thomasmorley65
Reviewers: , Message: Does this one need a convert-rule? If so, I'd need some help. My python-skill is more or less zero. Description: Fix underline-markup to make multiple calls have nice output Amend regtest markup-commands.ly with an example for it. Please review this at