Hi bug-squad,
On 22/04/12 06:39, James wrote:
Hello,
On 22 April 2012 04:12, Mark Mathias d8val...@gmail.com wrote:
So... as far as the Bug Squad is concerned, are we still waiting
for something or does this need to get added to the tracker?
Thanks, Mark
As far as the bug squad are
So... as far as the Bug Squad is concerned, are we still waiting for
something or does this need to get added to the tracker?
Thanks,
Mark
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 1:52 AM, m...@apollinemike.com
m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
On Apr 20, 2012, at 7:40 AM, James wrote:
Hello,
On 20 April
Hello,
On 22 April 2012 04:12, Mark Mathias d8val...@gmail.com wrote:
So... as far as the Bug Squad is concerned, are we still waiting for
something or does this need to get added to the tracker?
Thanks,
Mark
As far as the bug squad are concerned - being one myself - we'd like a
James pkx1...@gmail.com writes:
Hello,
On 20 April 2012 00:40, Nick Payne nick.pa...@internode.on.net wrote:
The documentation at
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.15/Documentation/notation/creating-footnotes for
both automatic and manual footnotes says that the \footnote command must
come
Hello,
On 20 April 2012 00:40, Nick Payne nick.pa...@internode.on.net wrote:
The documentation at
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.15/Documentation/notation/creating-footnotes for
both automatic and manual footnotes says that the \footnote command must
come *before* the grob to which the footnote
On Apr 20, 2012, at 7:40 AM, James wrote:
Hello,
On 20 April 2012 00:40, Nick Payne nick.pa...@internode.on.net wrote:
The documentation at
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.15/Documentation/notation/creating-footnotes for
both automatic and manual footnotes says that the \footnote command must
