Re: IR: Improve performer documentation (issue 6868047)

2012-12-31 Thread src
David, On 2012/12/02 11:11:54, dak wrote: https://codereview.appspot.com/6868047/diff/1/scm/document-translation.scm File scm/document-translation.scm (right): Sorry for resurrecting this a month late, I think I only quite understood yesterday what you actually meant. It is somewhat obsolete

IR: Improve performer documentation (issue 6868047)

2012-12-02 Thread dak
Improving the docs certainly is quite worthwhile. https://codereview.appspot.com/6868047/diff/1/scm/document-translation.scm File scm/document-translation.scm (right): https://codereview.appspot.com/6868047/diff/1/scm/document-translation.scm#newcode21 scm/document-translation.scm:21: ;; type

Re: IR: Improve performer documentation (issue 6868047)

2012-12-02 Thread src
Reviewers: dak, Message: On 2012/12/02 11:11:54, dak wrote: https://codereview.appspot.com/6868047/diff/1/scm/document-translation.scm#newcode21 scm/document-translation.scm:21: ;; type predicates ly:engraver? and ly:performer?. I think that this approach is not really helping as it is