Re: Issue 5788: New French Beamimg Approach (issue 557500043 by torsten.haemme...@web.de)

2021-12-16 Thread islasromero05
https://codereview.appspot.com/557500043/ este numero de telefono y el 5574447028 me robaron todas mis cuentas .cbraun811...@gmail.com,ashkar26@gmail,ashka...@gmail.com,supermanromero1...@gmail.com, https://codereview.appspot.com/557500043/

Re: Issue 5788: New French Beamimg Approach (issue 557500043 by torsten.haemme...@web.de)

2021-12-16 Thread islasromero05
https://codereview.appspot.com/557500043/

Re: Issue 5788: New French Beamimg Approach (issue 557500043 by torsten.haemme...@web.de)

2020-02-26 Thread thomasmorley65
On 2020/02/26 21:56:46, dak wrote: > On 2020/02/26 21:50:05, lemzwerg wrote: > > > How about > > > * beamed-stem-french-adjustment > > > * french-beaming-stem-adjustment > > > …? > > > > I like the second one. > > I'd be fine with it. +1 https://codereview.appspot.com/557500043/

Re: Issue 5788: New French Beamimg Approach (issue 557500043 by torsten.haemme...@web.de)

2020-02-26 Thread dak
On 2020/02/26 21:50:05, lemzwerg wrote: > > How about > > * beamed-stem-french-adjustment > > * french-beaming-stem-adjustment > > …? > > I like the second one. I'd be fine with it. https://codereview.appspot.com/557500043/

Re: Issue 5788: New French Beamimg Approach (issue 557500043 by torsten.haemme...@web.de)

2020-02-26 Thread lemzwerg--- via Discussions on LilyPond development
> How about > * beamed-stem-french-adjustment > * french-beaming-stem-adjustment > …? I like the second one. https://codereview.appspot.com/557500043/

Re: Issue 5788: New French Beamimg Approach (issue 557500043 by torsten.haemme...@web.de)

2020-02-26 Thread torsten . haemmerle
> I'll really make myself unpopular here, […] No, that's what discussions are for. I probably shouldn't have uploaded a second patch set before the property name had finally been decided upon, but I was kind of urged by the countdown starting and didn't have the time for working on it earlier.

Re: Issue 5788: New French Beamimg Approach (issue 557500043 by torsten.haemme...@web.de)

2020-02-26 Thread dak
https://codereview.appspot.com/557500043/diff/563610046/scm/define-grob-properties.scm File scm/define-grob-properties.scm (right): https://codereview.appspot.com/557500043/diff/563610046/scm/define-grob-properties.scm#newcode1374 scm/define-grob-properties.scm:1374: amount of space in case of

Re: Issue 5788: New French Beamimg Approach (issue 557500043 by torsten.haemme...@web.de)

2020-02-26 Thread hanwenn
On 2020/02/26 21:14:54, Be-3 wrote: > On 2020/02/26 21:04:59, Be-3 wrote: > > Changes applied following the reviewers' comments > > All of the recommendations applied: > > Rename stru Beam_stem_length -> Beam_stem_end (Han-Wen) > Rename property french-correction -> stem-end-shorten

Re: Issue 5788: New French Beamimg Approach (issue 557500043 by torsten.haemme...@web.de)

2020-02-26 Thread torsten . haemmerle
On 2020/02/26 21:04:59, Be-3 wrote: > Changes applied following the reviewers' comments All of the recommendations applied: Rename stru Beam_stem_length -> Beam_stem_end (Han-Wen) Rename property french-correction -> stem-end-shorten (Han-Wen) Make property stem-end-shorten

Re: Issue 5788: New French Beamimg Approach (issue 557500043 by torsten.haemme...@web.de)

2020-02-25 Thread lemzwerg--- via Discussions on LilyPond development
> It sounds like actual manipulation of that property > by the user would interfere with the implementation > of french-beaming. So maybe just mark/sort it as an > internal property and only regtest french-beaming as > such? If this is the intention, yes.

Re: Issue 5788: New French Beamimg Approach (issue 557500043 by torsten.haemme...@web.de)

2020-02-25 Thread dak
On 2020/02/25 13:33:13, lemzwerg wrote: > > > Please add one or more test cases for your 'french-correction' property. > > > > What specific French beaming examples are you missing? > > I was probably unclear. What I want is an example that shows how the > 'french-correction' *property* changes

Re: Issue 5788: New French Beamimg Approach (issue 557500043 by torsten.haemme...@web.de)

2020-02-25 Thread torsten . haemmerle
On 2020/02/25 13:33:13, lemzwerg wrote: > If you really wanted 'i.e.' without a trailing comma, it would be necessary to > write 'i.e.@:'. Otherwise makeinfo inserts two spaces in the '.info' file > because we don't use '@frenchspacing' in the English docs. Thanks for the valuable explanation.

Re: Issue 5788: New French Beamimg Approach (issue 557500043 by torsten.haemme...@web.de)

2020-02-25 Thread lemzwerg--- via Discussions on LilyPond development
> > s/i.e./i.e.,/ > > Ah, then I suppose the changes.tely language is American English... Yes, for the whole documentation we use (more or less) American spelling rules. If you really wanted 'i.e.' without a trailing comma, it would be necessary to write 'i.e.@:'. Otherwise makeinfo inserts

Re: Issue 5788: New French Beamimg Approach (issue 557500043 by torsten.haemme...@web.de)

2020-02-25 Thread dak
On 2020/02/25 13:06:31, Be-3 wrote: > On 2020/02/24 06:44:39, hanwenn wrote: > > One thing to consider: since the mechanics are now very predictable, maybe we > > can name the property in after its mechanics? ie. french-correction -> > > stem-end-shorten or something? > > After having thought

Re: Issue 5788: New French Beamimg Approach (issue 557500043 by torsten.haemme...@web.de)

2020-02-25 Thread torsten . haemmerle
Proposed changes applied to my local branch (most of them), see comments. Ta, Torsten https://codereview.appspot.com/557500043/diff/551490044/Documentation/changes.tely File Documentation/changes.tely (right):

Re: Issue 5788: New French Beamimg Approach (issue 557500043 by torsten.haemme...@web.de)

2020-02-25 Thread torsten . haemmerle
On 2020/02/24 06:44:39, hanwenn wrote: > One thing to consider: since the mechanics are now very predictable, maybe we > can name the property in after its mechanics? ie. french-correction -> > stem-end-shorten or something? After having thought about it for quite a while I'm not too happy with

Re: Issue 5788: New French Beamimg Approach (issue 557500043 by torsten.haemme...@web.de)

2020-02-23 Thread hanwenn
LGTM special thanks for your well reasoned and extensive commit message. One thing to consider: since the mechanics are now very predictable, maybe we can name the property in after its mechanics? ie. french-correction -> stem-end-shorten or something?

Re: Issue 5788: New French Beamimg Approach (issue 557500043 by torsten.haemme...@web.de)

2020-02-23 Thread lemzwerg--- via Discussions on LilyPond development
LGTM. Very nice, thanks! Some minor nits only. https://codereview.appspot.com/557500043/diff/551490044/Documentation/changes.tely File Documentation/changes.tely (right): https://codereview.appspot.com/557500043/diff/551490044/Documentation/changes.tely#newcode67

Issue 5788: New French Beamimg Approach (issue 557500043 by torsten.haemme...@web.de)

2020-02-23 Thread torsten . haemmerle
Reviewers: , Message: Deep breath---please review. Ta, Torsten Description: Issue 5788: New French Beamimg Approach Completely new approach to French beaming. This will automatically tackle all kinds of not-yet resolved positioning problems caused by the current French beaming implementation.