- Original Message -
From: Keith OHara k-ohara5...@oco.net
To: lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Sent: Saturday, January 07, 2012 6:16 AM
Subject: Re: staging is a safety net, not a trampoline
Graham Percival graham at percival-music.ca writes:
But please consider testing your patches a bit
hello,
On 7 January 2012 11:42, Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net wrote:
- Original Message - From: Keith OHara k-ohara5...@oco.net
To: lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Sent: Saturday, January 07, 2012 6:16 AM
Subject: Re: staging is a safety net, not a trampoline
Graham Percival graham at
- Original Message -
From: James pkx1...@gmail.com
To: Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net
Cc: lilypond-devel@gnu.org; Keith OHara k-ohara5...@oco.net
Sent: Saturday, January 07, 2012 11:54 AM
Subject: Re: staging is a safety net, not a trampoline
hello,
On 7 January 2012 11:42, Phil
Guys,
We've had a bunch of patches breaking staging now. This is
problematic because it holds up other patches from getting into
master. In turn, this holds up a release because I feel weird
about making a release when there's half a dozen patches waiting
to go into master. And right now, this
Graham Percival graham at percival-music.ca writes:
But please consider testing your patches a bit more before sending
them in.
Sorry that was probably me.
I thought I was safe after testing with doc-section.sh, but these scripts
do not report the warnings from lilypond snippets in the docs.
On Sat, Jan 07, 2012 at 06:16:45AM +, Keith OHara wrote:
Sorry that was probably me.
Not just you -- out of the 7 commits in staging when I began
today, 2 are now known to have problems (one of those was yours).
However, at least one of the 5 in staging-broken-jan7 *also*
breaks the doc
